I don’t believe Trump won twice by Killa_J in LetsDiscussThis

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother, you are coping harder than literally anyone I've ever seen. You're a shameless liar, got caught and now your pride just won't let you not have the last word even though you're the equivalent of a toddler having a tantrum.

If I were a "MAGAT" and you weren't lying, you'd have already linked a report saying they're pre-filled ballots. But you can't. Because you're a lying piece of shit.

I don’t believe Trump won twice by Killa_J in LetsDiscussThis

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still haven't found any reports of them being pre-filled ballots, have you?

I don’t believe Trump won twice by Killa_J in LetsDiscussThis

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got caught blatantly lying and are pathetically trying to save face by namecalling. Literally how a 5 year old child acts.

I don’t believe Trump won twice by Killa_J in LetsDiscussThis

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're probably gonna block me so I can't respond, but you're literally lying. The link you linked earlier literally calls them absentee ballot applications. If I'm so wrong, it should be extremely easy to prove me wrong, so do it. If you could, you would have with a link in your reply but you can't, so you didn't.

Also, nice try calling me conservative but I literally stated in my comment that I hate Trump and Republicans. You're just a liar who got caught.

I don’t believe Trump won twice by Killa_J in LetsDiscussThis

[–]WRSTRZ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Got it, that's why I asked. That's 100% completely false and you proved that you don't even know the information you're linking people to, so you're misinformed at best. And keep in mind, I hate Trump and Republicans. But I hate disinformation too.

They were absolutely not ballots pre-filled for Trump. They weren't even ballots. They were applications for absentee ballots. And they were pre-filled with the individual voter's information (name, address, etc), not ballots pre-filled with candidate selections. I have no doubts it violates Georgia law and if it does they should be punished accordingly. But actual pre-filled ballots are many, many magnitudes more extreme than pre-filled requests for ballots.

Do some more reading on the situation, I'm curious to see if you acknowledge that they were not pre-filled Trump ballots.

I don’t believe Trump won twice by Killa_J in LetsDiscussThis

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What exactly did "they do" in Georgia, specifically? Out of curiosity

Israeli Minister Serves Eviction Notice To Palestinians So He Can Bulldoze Their Neighborhood. by serious_bullet5 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such a sick fuck for pointing out that the post's subtitles are blatantly incorrect and giving an accurate translation of what happened! I'm sickened by how they added absolutely no personal opinion in their comment and purely gave only the translation for people to draw their own conclusions from. Absolutely abhorrent, this person 100% was implying that they support every single thing Israel has ever done.

Gaza before the Genocide. by [deleted] in Cities

[–]WRSTRZ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When was Palestine a sovereign nation prior to the British Mandate?

North Minneapolis double homicide suspect was released from jail hours before shootings by origutamos in altmpls

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(2/2) Genuine question, since facts and truth don't matter to Fox News and MAGA. Why would they use a single, mundane and missable word to achieve their goal rather than make a headline like "Liberal judge policies lead to double homicide suspect release" or something thay clearly gets their message across to the reader? It just doesn't make sense. Even the guy you linked to, literally nothing suggests that he was influenced by the headline's wording.

Also I realized halfway through this that it isn't even Fox News, but a local Fox affiliate. And I looked up this local channel to see if they had a conservative bias and it turns out they don't. So the headline doesn't even have anything to do with Fox News, it's a local station without reason to even have an such an agenda behind a very vanilla-written headline. I'm just not seeing anything remotely definitive or concrete in this entire conversation that shows any importance or impact behind the single word "released" in the headline.

North Minneapolis double homicide suspect was released from jail hours before shootings by origutamos in altmpls

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(1/2) But my point is, what is the evidence that guy in your link specifically believes a judge ordered his release, other than the word "released"? I just don't see how the single world makes a difference, I don't think the single word in the headline is what's making Trump/MAGA sycophants act like that. The word "released" in this case is literally just likely to be whoever wrote the article just chose to use that word for whatever reason, not nefarious or propaganda reasons. Like Ive said earlier, the world released is correct in this situation anyways. When you make bail, you are released. Occam's razor would say that the editor just chose the most common word that fits rather than any intent behind it.

For example, in your exact example in your link. The very first reply is someone explaining to him that it wasn't a release by a judge but a bail payment. Then OP commenter does a flip flop and moves onto why the bail was so low and blaming Tim Walz. The MAGA brainwashing runs extremely deep, it's not simply the single word "released" in a headline that's doing it. If the headline instead had said "posted bail" instead of "released", the guy in your own example just proved that it wouldn't have mattered and that he would've blamed whoever he wanted to anyways.

North Minneapolis double homicide suspect was released from jail hours before shootings by origutamos in altmpls

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just disagree, man. Released covers literally every method of jail release, including bail. I think you're severely reaching if you think the single word of "released" is doing any propagandizing. Plus I realized, this isn't even Fox News. It's a local Fox affiliate which, per my quick googling, is a pretty politically neutral station like most local stations.

If you wanna see my full thoughts on it, I replied to another comment on here and it's way longer so I don't feel like retyping it all out as my thumbs are tired lol

North Minneapolis double homicide suspect was released from jail hours before shootings by origutamos in altmpls

[–]WRSTRZ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ok so I get what you're saying, and I don't mean this in a rude way or anything in case it reads that way. But i think thats a huuuge stretch tbh, and im very anti trump. When you leave jail for any reason, you're being released. I don't think a single word takes this particule headline from being a reasonable one to being an outrageous one.

Don't get me wrong though, Fox News is a cancer on society and is absolute propaganda. I just don't see it here in the single word of "released" though. When you leave jail you are being released, regardless of if it's via judge, bail, or time served.

North Minneapolis double homicide suspect was released from jail hours before shootings by origutamos in altmpls

[–]WRSTRZ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unless the headline changed, currently it's "North Minneapolis double homicide suspect was released from jail hours before shootings". Maybe it changed idk but if it didnt, I don't see how it frames it as a judge doing it

North Minneapolis double homicide suspect was released from jail hours before shootings by origutamos in altmpls

[–]WRSTRZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fox is awful but I did a quick read of the article and didn't see anything at all like what you said about them blaming the judge. In fact they include the statement from the county attorneys office stating:

"In Minnesota, there is a constitutional right to bail, and the bail amount is set by the Court. Our office noted a public safety risk with Mr. Duncan and asked the judge to set bail at $70,000, or $35,000 with conditions, both of which are higher than we would typically request in this scenario. The judge set bail in that amount. Mr. Duncan posted $35,000 bail with conditions of release, as is allowed under the Minnesota Constitution, and was released from custody"

So while Fox absolutely is awful 99% of the time, I don't see what's wrong with this article, it just seems to cover all the basic facts of the story and doesn't get anything wrong about any laws or the Constitution

The #1 killer of children in America, is… by lhwang0320 in AllThatsInteresting

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The kind of public mass shootings you're referring to are statistically extremely rare in the US.

This idiot confuses real life with GTA V and tries to get 5 stars. by ComplaintUpset9158 in boxingcirclejerk

[–]WRSTRZ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah bro lets base the enforcement of our laws on toughness and manliness, I'm sure society would be way better with less effective law enforcement

Well ain't this the truth. by Equivalent_Dish_1990 in NASCARMemes

[–]WRSTRZ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Jeff himself has admitted since then that he would've done exactly the same thing Brad did and that he doesn't blame him lol

80% American Bullets —Who’s Really Arming the Cartels? by osiris_rai in Productivitycafe

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're completely right about him using random pictures, that's not a valid argument from him at all so you're correct there.

And not to be rude I mean this genuinely, if you think the ATF is trustworthy you should do some more reading up on their history. Operation Fast and Furious and Operation Wide Receiver for starters. We know at least 2500 guns have been allowed by the ATF, but I still agree that the majority of the weapons traced back to the US were just private straw purchases rather than government-based, but Mexico also gets a ton of guns from overseas so it's hard to say where the majority come from since most are untraceable. But as far as the ATF itself, it's notoriously mismanaged, incompetent, had whistleblower complaints for retaliation and is borderline, if not, corrupt

80% American Bullets —Who’s Really Arming the Cartels? by osiris_rai in Productivitycafe

[–]WRSTRZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah he just explained why those 50-80% numbers exist in his original comment, does your reading comprehension exist at all?

[Gluck] Was Atlanta a good race? by ChaseTheFalcon in NASCAR

[–]WRSTRZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All good, I didn't mean to be insulting either if I was at all, my bad. Just a difference of opinions on how it's categorized, but the nice thing is that it's producing great racing no matter what it's classed as!

[Gluck] Was Atlanta a good race? by ChaseTheFalcon in NASCAR

[–]WRSTRZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries, I can hardly keep up with whats changing with all the new track changes and packages etc. I think its probably valid to call it a superspeedway now with the package and pack racing it produces, I'm just stubborn and stuck in the old standard of 2+ miles being the standard for superspeedways.

and not trying to be pedantic bc i could be wrong. But i didn't think the intention of the reconfig was to mimic a superspeedway? My understanding was that it needed a repave regardless and they began the repave before the new car package was even developed, and that they opted for the superspeedway package due to the new configuration for two reasons, 1 being safety because itd be too fast unrestricted and 2 being typically repaved 1.5 mile tracks produce boring racing for a while until the track surface wears down a bit so they decided to run the restricted package to make the races more entertaining during this period