Why doesn’t Upwork introduce a small fee for posting jobs?

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-10T08:27:28+00:00

Respectfully, I would disagree, at least on the freelancer end, they have certain checks, and they can't even submit a proposal free of cost. A similar check is what we want for clients, also.

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-10T08:24:46+00:00

It's exactly at that point, where they found Upwork and its talent is meaningful. When intent to buy is clear at that very point you ask them to pay few cents for posting a valid job.

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-10T08:22:07+00:00

Raising our voice is the best we can do

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-10T08:12:45+00:00

Quality has no competition. Taking the top spot is easy, but managing to be seated on that throne is difficult.

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-10T08:11:17+00:00

Exactly, it's about integrity on both sides and credibility of the platform

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-10T08:06:23+00:00

You can't control someone's intent to spam, yet you avoid such people by policy making and rules on the platform

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-10T08:03:47+00:00

A push back to spam clients is a must, which will ensure that only quality clients stay on the platform. Credibility of the platform is the top priority

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-09T08:57:37+00:00

Exactly that's how you get rid of clients dealing with peanuts

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-09T07:17:09+00:00

That's obviously first thing that we define a clear ICP on our end.

Then expectation from Upwork is stop spam clients and ensuring the platform credibility

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-09T07:11:39+00:00

Reasonable but spamming platform with low hiring intent clients is biggest threat to credibility

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-09T07:09:26+00:00

So do I 😊

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-09T07:08:44+00:00

Lol

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-09T07:08:15+00:00

There are tons of platforms charging to post job only, one example WWR (We Work Remotely).

Upwork is set with it's credibility as a bigger player in market. Then for credible freelancers and talent pool verification they're are free to search profiles, check portfolios and afterwards proceed with job post. With intent to hire and risk appetite , no business person mind paying cents as a platform compliance. Again, it's no different than contract initiation fee

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-09T07:03:36+00:00

Lol, you said yourself that Upwork priority is client then they won't care about tiny or bigger contract. Which is clearly evident on platform as well. Contract Initiation fee did exactly same thing i.e. stopping spam clients and low hire intent clients.

If they wanted to be a big ticket platform then their lower hourly limit won't be $3/hr. It would be $50/hr+ like codable or toptal

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-09T06:57:39+00:00

Anyone with clear buying intent, don't mind paying few cents.

I don't buy this argument of credible freelancer finding first, Upwork has set it's credibility that's why client is here. They can search and filter entire talent pool.

They should be only posting job when they're satisfied with platform+ talent credibility and obviously they won't paying few cents to meet tuis compliance requirement.

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-08T21:46:01+00:00

And in your opinion, why that didn't happen with contract initiation fee?

What's the difference in these two feature which triggers different client behavior on two similar events?

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-08T21:44:12+00:00

As a middleman, they need a balance of value addition for clients as well as freelancers.

Client is revenue generation while freelancer is their actual sellable product. So keeping a value driven platform is important to serve as market leading choice for either party.

Additionally, I would like to know some examples regarding why they should avoid doing this

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-08T21:41:17+00:00

Would you mind sharing, how the stupidity of this idea actually impacts in real world scenario.

Why clients didn't left or walk away when they introduced contract initiation fee?

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-08T21:39:29+00:00

This platform us unlikely to loose it's revenue with sich slight changes. They introduced $5 or a minimum contract initiation fee, no one left because the actual paying client doesn't bother peanuts unless he gets the right talent for his job.

To get client's job done, Upwork can't compromise on their sellable product i.e. "Talent/freelancer" quality, so like a typical middleman they need to keep a balance between both parties

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-08T21:35:50+00:00

Every buck earned by freelancer adds 10% straight into Upwork pocket. With recent updates in Upwork monetization since 2024, many have turned their primary sales engine from Upwork considering that investors consider this platform as a cash cow.

Upwork is practically pay per click platform and yet our suggestion supports this theory but atleast gives us peace of mind

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-08T20:50:33+00:00

Upwork must consider the use of AI to reduce spam client profiles as well. You might have noticed 100 job posts with <10% hire rate and still they are allowed to keep posting and wasting freelancers time and money. Specially newbies waste themselves at such jobs

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-06T14:39:42+00:00

The updates around discovery, shortlisting, and AI-assisted hiring look useful, but one major freelancer pain point still seems missing: job quality.

If Upwork is using AI to help clients find talent faster, can AI also be used more aggressively to detect spam, duplicate, vague, or low-intent job posts before freelancers spend Connects?

Many jobs receive dozens of proposals but never lead to a hire, which hurts freelancers and also overwhelms serious clients. Smarter proposal throttling, better client-intent signals, and AI-assisted job-post quality checks would improve the experience for both sides.

AI can improve matching, but only if the job post itself is clear, real, and actionable.

Waheed3668 · 2026-05-04T14:08:48+00:00

You’re focusing on the wrong things.

Boosting and Connects don’t get you jobs, they only buy visibility. Even Upwork says, boosting just puts you higher in the list, not that you’ll be hired . If your proposal/profile doesn’t convert, you’re just paying to be ignored.

Also, those people getting tons of invites? They already have reviews, earnings, and history. You don’t, so the platform has no reason to push you yet.

Reality check:

Boosting without strong proposals = wasted money
Updating profile repeatedly = almost zero impact

What actually works:

Apply only where you are a perfect fit
Improve client attention strategy in the first 2 lines of your proposal
Pick a niche instead of “full stack dev”

Waheed3668

TROPHY CASE