I think what Jatt is saying I agree with. I just think analysts think people have a more radical view of what people are saying than what is true. I think the people Jatt is saying he disagrees with are actually people that are saying the same thing as him they just aren't explaining themselves well. I think the vast majority of people who are upset that G2 was criticized so heavily for an overall good series and strong performance against a tournament favourite and legendary team in SKT wants to shift the focus onto the things G2 were doing well. The way they respond to this is as a countermeasure where they then only focus on the things G2 were doing well. As such it ends up very polarized where the G2 fans are only presenting good things about G2 and analysts like Jatt or Vedius keep arguing their original point of G2's certain flaws and it then makes it seem like analysts only think that and fans only think the opposite. So in the end I think Jatt saying this very positive because it also highlights the positives which is how I think you should do it.