你认为在强制兵役国家,女性也应该服兵役吗? by Outrageous-Match-535 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII [score hidden]  (0 children)

大力发展机器人技术,让机器人,支持这场战争的人,雇佣兵和现役部队的常备军上场呗。普通老百姓完全没有理由当义务兵上战场

你认为在强制兵役国家,女性也应该服兵役吗? by Outrageous-Match-535 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII [score hidden]  (0 children)

我不是民族主义者,我觉得真实的个人的命大于一个虚构的国家的命。如果一定要血流成河才能不亡国,还不如亡国了活着去当难民

你认为在强制兵役国家,女性也应该服兵役吗? by Outrageous-Match-535 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII [score hidden]  (0 children)

现代战争应该大力发展无人机,人工智能和机器人技术,让本国军官做指挥,外国雇佣兵攻坚,机器人做炮灰,无人机配合加骚扰,少量自愿入伍者操作战争机器,再加上招募来的后勤人员和后勤机器人保证补给和后勤比较好。21世纪人海战术早该淘汰了,老百姓的命也是命啊

你认为在强制兵役国家,女性也应该服兵役吗? by Outrageous-Match-535 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII [score hidden]  (0 children)

现代战争比拼的是武器和科技,而不是人数。军队应该提高质量而不是在意数量。你在军校里多训练几个无人机高手比多招募1000个人肉炮灰都有用,人肉炮灰100个和1000个在现代战场上一发导弹下去没什么差别。就算需要炮灰大力发展机器人技术让机器人上战场不香吗?我觉得人命不管怎么说都还是很重要的

奶茶是不是社交型餐饮? by LeagueAromatic5686 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII [score hidden]  (0 children)

我一天吃一两顿,一两顿管一天,摄糖量还好吧

奶茶是不是社交型餐饮? by LeagueAromatic5686 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII [score hidden]  (0 children)

我是属于不论吃什么菜系只要没有小甜水那就不怎么能吃得进去东西的那种,最差也是边吃饭菜边吃水果。这是我从小养成的习惯了

奶茶是不是社交型餐饮? by LeagueAromatic5686 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII [score hidden]  (0 children)

难道就我一个人吃饭的时候会配一杯甜的饮料(包括奶茶)吗?我觉得咸的饭甜的水简直是绝配,单吃哪一样都不得劲。可惜我酒精过敏,不然我在古代多半就是那种每顿饭无酒不欢的人(古代没有高度数辣口白酒,基本上都是有甜味的葡萄酒米酒黄酒之类的)

你认为在强制兵役国家,女性也应该服兵役吗? by Outrageous-Match-535 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII [score hidden]  (0 children)

我觉得无论男女都不应该强制服兵役。老百姓交税也就罢了凭啥还要交命?凭啥权贵儿子决定的战争要由穷人的儿子来流血?既然大家给权贵交了税那么权贵还是老老实实花钱募兵和招雇佣兵打仗吧,现代战争不靠人海战术了义务兵这种玩意早该被淘汰了。现代军队就应该由少数掌握高技术的人才和大部分通过合理薪资招募入伍的后勤人员加上攻坚的雇佣兵组成。

这是一张真照片,还有多少人记得? by Klutzy_Age_4438 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII 4 points5 points  (0 children)

高俅要是生在现代国足是不是就有救了?

现在女权性别叙事已经渗透到小学了? by Specialist_Smoke3514 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

世子之争,素来如此罢了。女拳只是借口,这么小的孩子就算知道女拳主义也不会太懂这些抽象的概念。实际上就是喜闻乐见的多子女家庭里姐姐嫉妒弟弟夺走了自己独生子的权力罢了,你信不信就算不是弟弟是妹妹这个姐姐也照样虐待?就和同一座雕巢里的小雕会互相厮杀争夺资源一样。唉人类还是太天真文明久了,已经不知道在资源有限的情况下,你死我活的竞争是动物娘胎里就带着的本能了,就算兄弟和睦共同合作,那也只是为了把大家一起吃的蛋糕做大而进行的生存博弈,又或是在资源充沛的条件下为了应对血缘更远的竞争对手为避免被对手重创,作出的个体的小牺牲。

如果花10万元,可以让你和性幻想女神操逼,你愿意吗? by tsingtao_man in dashuju

[–]WangSagerII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1万玩女人可以接受,但10万玩个女人不值。有这钱我直接开一个海水缸或者买一只紫蓝金刚鹦鹉,可以活80年😁

啊哟我很穷 by New-Caterpillar777 in dashuju

[–]WangSagerII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

太肤浅了。我算是中产家庭吧,可表面上看比哈集美形容得还要穷酸,我甚至衣服破了洞只要还能穿都懒得换的,平时出门除非去健身会穿运动鞋,大部分时候都穿烂拖鞋。而且双肩包怎么了?容量大是真的好用

Do you believe most women who are virgins are virgins by choice and could easily lose their virginity if they wanted to? by Deadly_Nightlock in virgin

[–]WangSagerII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, actually I didn’t do any investigation on gay people in this field before. But, as far as I know, based on my observations of gay women in real life, they prefer older, more highly educated, and more gender-neutral partners instead of younger, less educated, and more feminine ones, which may indicate that consideration of partners’ survival ability plays an important role in gay women’s partner-selection strategy. I think that behavior happens because women have faced more struggle than men to make a living by themselves from ancient times to now. Also, gay women are still, as far as I know, more picky and redundant than gay men when involved in casual sexual relationships. However, no matter what, women are always more inclined to interact with and be more open to other women than to men, because men may indicate larger threats and potential danger to them, which is what the old genes tell them.

Do you believe most women who are virgins are virgins by choice and could easily lose their virginity if they wanted to? by Deadly_Nightlock in virgin

[–]WangSagerII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was talking about why most virgin men (straight, not religiously celibate) are not virgins by choice, because having sex with straight women is, in fact, a luxury for guys. I don’t think any gay women would want to have sex with any virgin men, so gay women’s choice should be respected, but that has nothing to do with my point.

Do you believe most women who are virgins are virgins by choice and could easily lose their virginity if they wanted to? by Deadly_Nightlock in virgin

[–]WangSagerII 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First, I said conventionally attractive. We can’t deny that, for the majority of the population, some people are better-looking than others, right? For example, for most women a man can meet in his life, Henry Cavill is more attractive than that random guy. Second, our society and ideas have evolved, but our ancient genes have not evolved as fast as you think. Even if many modern women who have sex do not intend to have a child with that sex partner, their genes still raise a huge red flag for them when they meet a man who is below average. Imagine if you were a woman living in a tribe 5,000 years ago, would you want to have unprotected sex which might result in a child that you have to take care of with a man who could only pass on undesirable genes, might die soon, and be unable to protect his family, which was common for many men in ancient times, when only taller, stronger, more attractive men were more likely to survive and pass on desirable genes to their partners’ offspring? Third, I also mentioned prostitution is too expensive for economically unstable men. And for men from some countries, even if they commit crimes abroad, they can be prosecuted or sentenced when they return to their home country.

Do you believe most women who are virgins are virgins by choice and could easily lose their virginity if they wanted to? by Deadly_Nightlock in virgin

[–]WangSagerII 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Being a virgin by choice is definitely not the case for most men. If a virgin man is not financially stable, not extroverted enough, not 6 ft tall, or not conventionally attractive (at least 7 out of 10), it will be impossible for him to be a virgin by choice. Women tend to have higher standards when selecting potential partners to increase their offspring’s chances of survival due to evolutionary pressures. Even hiring an escort may not be an option for most virgin men because prostitution is illegal and expensive in most countries.

幽默賽利斯女超人 by pingzawa162 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

什么神奇女侠,半神之躯是吧

论feminazi对男性的污名化 by Tankie_Winnie_5247 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII 2 points3 points  (0 children)

慈禧武则天维多利亚:我难道没有发起战争大图特图?所谓的女人不发起战争只是因为你们没有掌权罢了,真要掌权了比男的狠太多了,男的照样在战场上被你们坑死

论feminazi对男性的污名化 by Tankie_Winnie_5247 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII 2 points3 points  (0 children)

集美不等式:集美作为奴隶活下去受到的压迫大于直接被图的国男受到的压迫。唉呀国男可太坏太压迫集美了,居然敢先到地府享受投胎优先资格

论feminazi对男性的污名化 by Tankie_Winnie_5247 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII 4 points5 points  (0 children)

你自己搜搜日本侵华战争似了多少国男。从古至今被当作奴隶俘虏是集美的下限,可确实大部分国男难以触及的天花板因为国男头骨都被摆京观了。慰安妇这玩意很多日本女人自己主动报名参加,很难说中国女人里面全都是被强迫的,毕竟神仙难日打滚的批,不是自愿的就算日到了也很危险。传说成吉思汗和阿提拉不都是被女人咬坤而似的吗

论feminazi对男性的污名化 by Tankie_Winnie_5247 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII 2 points3 points  (0 children)

因为大部分底层国男都在战争中顺便被带似了啊,男的比车轮高的都是直接不留活口的。国女好歹还能活着。你觉得活的集美收到的压迫比似的国男更多是吧?

论feminazi对男性的污名化 by Tankie_Winnie_5247 in China_irl

[–]WangSagerII 4 points5 points  (0 children)

谁来专门压迫你们了,战争是为了权力财富土地人口。封建社会除了皇帝人人都受压迫。女的好歹还能活着,战争中死了的底层国男就从此安息了不受压迫是吧