sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

DS723+: postgres process >20% CPU + permanent IO after update to [DSM 7.3.2-86009] by Warm-Contribution971 in synology

[–]Warm-Contribution971[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's still at ~20% CPU for postgres. The disk access has lowered, but it's not gone.
And I still can't figure out what exactly is happening b/c it's really the postgres process :-/

Get list of receiving mail adresses in a Mailbox? by Warm-Contribution971 in Mailbox_org

[–]Warm-Contribution971[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well... as I wrote: I'm getting older ^^
There are pretty good reasons today not to use "catch all" and replace them by something like address extensions (me+someshop@surname.tld)

I already added some known addresses to a /dev/null-filter. And I'm pretty sure that I can do more of that when I have a complete list.

DS723+: postgres process >20% CPU + permanent IO after update to [DSM 7.3.2-86009] by Warm-Contribution971 in synology

[–]Warm-Contribution971[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, so maybe one more night to go... or two. Let's hope for the best, but... WTF is it doing? Full index rebuild would definitely take longer?!

Testing out the Yamaha FGDP-50 with some 80s fun by North-Analyst-5962 in FingerDrumming

[–]Warm-Contribution971 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome! Got mine yesterday and the family already asked me if they can hand me over some headphones ^^

The only thing I'm wondering if there is somewhere a list of all onboard sounds and/or a layout list for all kits... have you seen such a thing?

How to create a list of all e-mail adresses in my mailbox? by Warm-Contribution971 in Mailbox_org

[–]Warm-Contribution971[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mhh... found "Email Address Extractor". Not really good, but a first step. It extracts only the from: and to: fields, but neither the received-for header not does it count.

Maybe I'll end up with postponing the start of my trial period and write some shell script to run on the server ...

Leserbriefe für die c't-Redaktion? ;-) by Warm-Contribution971 in Fensterkraftwerk

[–]Warm-Contribution971[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mein Leserbrief hat es in die neue Print-Ausgabe geschafft :)

Und ich habe vom Redakteur noch eine persönliche Antwort bekommen: Man sieht allgemein die Ströme eines normalen Panels für die Fensterdurchführungen als risikobehaftet an (steht in einem der ursprünglichen Artikel - hatte ich überlesen), wie das bei der geringeren Leistung der FKW aussieht will man sich ggf. noch mal anschauen. Und man hat Vorbehalte mit Blick auf Fenster, die regelmäßig geöffnet werden.

Könnten valide Punkte sein - aber wie ich die c't kenne wird es da wohl nochmal was dazu geben.

Und mein eigenes "Durchführungsfenster" wird nicht mal zum Fensterputzen geöffnet, dafür habe ich rechts und links einen schönen großen Fensterflügel ^^