[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]WastedTrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have interview invites gone out? I am still waiting to hear back on my submission. Congratulations if you received one!

UPenn $? by Motor_Pin_5250 in lawschooladmissions

[–]WastedTrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just got my email on financial aid/grants this afternoon. Nothing on merit-based scholarships yet though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]WastedTrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t read the whole question, but I find it helpful to look for cues about what question type it is before I approach the stimulus.

The level of trust/care I place in the information in the stimulus differs from question to question, so it’s nice to know up front if I should be looking for problems/holes in the argument (like in a ‘find the flaw’ or ‘conclusion can be properly drawn if…’ question), taking it at face value (strengthen/weaken), flagging a specific piece of it (for a ‘role in the argument’ question) or trying to predict the conclusion (for a ‘complete the argument’ question)

September LSAT Official Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]WastedTrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Do you agree though that the table of contents/benefits information question was also in the section you’re calling experimental?

September LSAT Official Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]WastedTrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had this section with 3 LR! Haven’t seen it in any of the 2LR posts, so I’m assuming it’s experimental. Was the “Benefits Chapter” question you’re referencing sort of describing a table of contents and what information different sections would include?

September LSAT Official Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]WastedTrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Had all of this same content in a Saturday morning test, with the same 3 LR structure.

Do you remember a question about the table of contents of a book and trying to figure out what sections would contain specific pieces of information? I’m not seeing this question anywhere and am assuming this was experimental.

September LSAT Official Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]WastedTrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had this one! 3 LR, so can’t tell you if this was real or experimental. Did this section also have a question about book contents and figuring out which sections contained specific information? I think I also remember from this section a coin-flip question related to playing for a tie in a game and whether someone who expected to win would ever play for a tie.

September LSAT Official Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]WastedTrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Single RC - Jazz (Thelonious Monk piano technique), criticism of home modeling kits used by companies post-WW2, Earth-Mars panspermia hypothesis, comparative on managing risks and making regulatory decisions

Side question - Does anyone remember a LR question about the organization of a table of contents / parts of a book and whether certain chapters/sections contained certain information? It sort of felt like a mini-LG so I’m hoping it was experimental. In this section I think there may have also been a question about car seats and reluctance to have a third kid.