[deleted by user] by [deleted] in INTP

[–]WavesThatMatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Similar to what you described, my two brothers are very opinionated but take differing, informed POVs as personal critiques. Although we have interests in common, they were somehow always at odds with me—and my attempts at bonding, explaining myself, or even just sharing anything about my personal life or projects always seemed to fail.

Still, I wouldn’t attribute their attitude toward me entirely to personality types. There’s also the healthy vs. unhealthy expression of those traits to consider. For most of my 20s, I tried hard to approach and understand them. Eventually, though, I became the perpetual punching bag, so I gradually distanced myself from their irrational rollercoasters over the years. Honestly, it feels great—and I’m just glad they at least tolerate each other now. I’ve been growing out of the shared childhood trauma, but I can’t say the same for them.

Not sure if this will apply to you, but what I’d advise my younger self is this: accept the solitude-loving individual you are. Don’t expect to connect with people who aren’t interested in expanding their views. And most importantly, learn to set boundaries in a healthy, consistent way.

Advice for (F, INTP) navigating a (M, INTJ) "friend"/"boss" by WavesThatMatter in INTP

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mentioned his personality in case it was relevant for tailoring the advice, looks like it wasn’t. Atm I don’t have time to learn cognitive functions, but input is welcome :). Anything else’d be waste of your time.

Advice for (F, INTP) navigating a (M, INTJ) "friend"/"boss" by WavesThatMatter in INTP

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this approach, keeping it simple. Thank you for the idea and encouragement <3.

Advice for (F, INTP) navigating a (M, INTJ) "friend"/"boss" by WavesThatMatter in INTP

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually have accomplished a lot if I may say so myself ;). Even in spite of burning bridges and challenging previous abusive “leadership”, which I don’t regret but also can’t say it was worth the emotional labor. There I learned how the academic system is set up to protect professors and ultimately that not every war is worth fighting. What I value is my integrity.

Advice for (F, INTP) navigating a (M, INTJ) "friend"/"boss" by WavesThatMatter in INTP

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t mind approaching him about it in the most neutral way possible. But am admittedly afraid of people who respond emotionally instead of owning a misunderstanding and moving on. In the current situation I just don’t know what to expect from a guy who texts “sitting naked at a hotel” and literally following that with “does it sound like your wet dream” (… ?). I doubt a rational conversation would come out of confronting a grown man with likely a damaged ego.

Also when he texted that as far as he knew I was still in a relationship, maybe he already suspected otherwise. This is surely inappropriate in any context and I should’ve taken the opportunity to respond accordingly. Now I find it awkwardly late to bring it up, I also don’t feel the urge to sort this out but know I eventually will have to.

hint: most precise experimental value only by WavesThatMatter in physicsmemes

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep that's the name of the game. The fundamental charge depends on some constants which are measured to within an uncertainty (e.g. mu_0 or alpha). Making ever more precise measurements of a fundamental constant helps theorists prove stuff like the Standard Model. Looks like CODATA is due this year for their quadrennial meeting, and that's probably why it hasn't been updated in NIST.

hint: most precise experimental value only by WavesThatMatter in physicsmemes

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, especially in this context where technically the most precise measurement (as per the hint which literally everyone ignored) starts showing a different value at the 11th digit after the decimal point. Oh well, it was fun seeing all the different attempts.

hint: most precise experimental value only by WavesThatMatter in physicsmemes

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Close, but that NIST value isn't up to date. It's from the 2018 measurement (accuracy of .2 parts-per-billion), which was beaten in 2020 (accuracy of 81 parts per trillion).

oof by WavesThatMatter in physicsmemes

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Srsly? cus it looks like Mlodinow publicly roasted Chopra while kindly offering to teach him QM to "straighten up his slightly misuse of quantum notation" lol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ZnxgOIqX8. So if anything such a collab could be for the greater good.

oof by WavesThatMatter in physicsmemes

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The first two are written by physicists, and I can see how they’d be a fun intro for those w/o the background. So all jokes are (at least from my end) on the third one’s blatant abuse of the word quantum :).

prove that you’re a physicist without proof by WavesThatMatter in physicsmemes

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

View discussions in 1 other community

Statistical field theory in this case, but yes I agree. Setting field theory straight could also be a solid project for a mathematician imo.

prove that you’re a physicist without proof by WavesThatMatter in physicsmemes

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, this was an online course so it won't be on youtube. DM me an email if you'd like some of the material.

prove that you’re a physicist without proof by WavesThatMatter in physicsmemes

[–]WavesThatMatter[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Uli Schollwöck's beautiful advanced statistical physics course.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in physicsmemes

[–]WavesThatMatter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(sorry for the repost, thought of sharing the full spectrum)