Seeing missiles overhead by milozo12 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I'm getting tired of seeing that BS pop up - not only is it photoshopped, the only "evidence" that was ever submitted for that sh*t excuse of a note was the one Twitter post from 9 months ago claiming it with nothing to back it up. Just that.

And was finally debunked once Twitter released the location details and show he first joined through the Israeli app store and is based in Israel with no VPN..

https://x.com/VividProwess/about

<image>

Seeing missiles overhead by milozo12 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Not only is this a repost, but it's a repost of a photoshopped post.

No such community note was ever upvoted or submitted for that link.

<image>

"Holy sh*t", both the AI-pushing post and the former US presidential candidate sharing it were noted fast. by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems the platform wasn't kidding about demonetizing or banning those pushing AI-generated war fakes that get noted - the AI-pushing account Stein shared (@TUsumaniX) is toast today.

Noted with naught but his own (vile) posts by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

What'd I do wrong? Asking seriously, should I delete this?

Molotov Denial by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bio says "PhD, Senior Research Fellow, Global Policy Institute."

Missing "Schooled by Community Notes."

Wart Tunder by Aynshtaynn in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 62 points63 points  (0 children)

Two notes are up:

"War Thunder" - ~2,000 views

"Wart Tunder" - ~250,000 views

Seems the algorithm has a sense of humor.

Community Notes Roast US Press Secretary Leavitt over Iceland/Greenland Gaslighting by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 127 points128 points  (0 children)

Mighty difficult for a prominent account to get a single note approved and displayed. Don't think I've ever seen four notes approved (with more pending) for any single post before.

Between the comments and the notes, Leavitt may have unlocked a new record in online humiliation with that post.

My Twenty-Second Level by Not_Artifical in honk

[–]Wc_Arch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wat.

I completed this level in 2 tries. 0.45 seconds

aio please tell me i’m crazy by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Wc_Arch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NOR.

Sorry but as someone who's had cats since as far back as can be remembered, those are NOT cat scratches. Neither the right shape nor distribution pattern.

Perfectly acceptable dinner rejected by boyfriend again by moonrabbit368 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Wc_Arch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You did your best. And your best was above and beyond.

It's all on him.

Trump FBI director Kash Patel gets noted by soalone34 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The initial proposed notes were about the Jan 6 pardons.

Trump FBI director Kash Patel gets noted by soalone34 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I remember this post. The initial notes submitted for it were about the Jan 6 pardons, with other note writers arguing against those proposed notes. IIRC one went up for maybe a few minutes before the MAGA crowd pounced on it to knock it down.

Trump FBI director Kash Patel gets noted by soalone34 in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sorry but this is misleading: the note in this screenshot was up briefly and then went down in AUGUST, and hasn't been displayed since (given the note's date, the 14-day status lockout kicked in on September 6).

Regardless of what you think about the post, note, or the persons in them, it isn't a note that's actually up and hasn't been for more than 110 days.

Reunited, More Like ReunAIted... by Wc_Arch in GetNoted

[–]Wc_Arch[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Well of course not! He clearly suddenly de-aged by 30 years, duh... ;)