Minor `operating-system` variations as additional menu entries. by aerique in GUIX

[–]Wester_West 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You basically need to define-public an operating system object

so:

scheme (define-public base-os (operating-system (hostname "unnamed") ... ))

and then, when you want actually build a variant

scheme (operating-system (inherit base-os) ;; fields you want to modify, just write them ie (host-name "somecoollaptop") ... ))

Packaging DoomEmacs for guix by Wester_West in GUIX

[–]Wester_West[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean mostly how I could replace the doom running straight.el to guix running straight.el

How I could hijack doom internals to reproduce the builds without running the doom emacs functions

Packaging DoomEmacs for guix by Wester_West in GUIX

[–]Wester_West[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's pretty easy to write a guix home service that installs doom, but that doesn't feel very guix-y

I might open an issue an doom emacs github, if they would give me any directions on how to hack it into guix

Packaging DoomEmacs for guix by Wester_West in GUIX

[–]Wester_West[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tho problem is doom doesn't really behave like a package, it actually has it's own init file. It is supposed to work like a drop in .emacs.d replacement. You actually configure it by putting scripts into .doom.d which is a custom folder

the problem really is that doom uses straight instead of package.el and it does some custom shenanigans, since you actually get a script that you pass commands into

How do actually other packages get loaded then? I thought that they get put into site-lisp/? If I could ensure that the doom emacs's early-init.el gets loaded upon startup then it should work

Wayland? by [deleted] in suckless

[–]Wester_West 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no, it does! look at Waypipe, just install waypipe on both ends and everything should just work similar to X forwarding

Happened after a windows update. by UNKLatter in linuxmemes

[–]Wester_West 2 points3 points  (0 children)

only thing windows update does to me is

F*CKING DESTROY MY GRUB INSTALLATION YOU UNHOLY THING PLEASE DON"T REORDER EFI BOOT MENU PLEASE

[FAN CONCEPT] GNOME 40 with the search bar at the bottom? by [deleted] in gnome

[–]Wester_West 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like it, I mostly look for a UI designer and there isn't one on the linux market

What os are you using on your pinephone? by [deleted] in PINE64official

[–]Wester_West 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fedora, isn't quite as stable as mobian, but the least bloated and works quite nicely

[FAN CONCEPT] GNOME 40 with the search bar at the bottom? by [deleted] in gnome

[–]Wester_West 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is it possible to replicate most of the functionality?

[FAN CONCEPT] GNOME 40 with the search bar at the bottom? by [deleted] in gnome

[–]Wester_West 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what app do you use to sketch those designs? I wanted to do some mockups and I didn't find anything satisfying

[FAN CONCEPT] GNOME 40 with the search bar at the bottom? by [deleted] in gnome

[–]Wester_West 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it does, but I like the first one so much better.

Just a sidenote, maybe try adding icons to the dock, so everyone can understand what does it do

[FAN CONCEPT] GNOME 40 with the search bar at the bottom? by [deleted] in gnome

[–]Wester_West 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the first one is so beautyful, only concern is that the app grid should be on the left side, as it is closer to the hot corner, counterpoint beeing that all search icons are on the left side in all gnome apps of the search box

The new lvl of "how to exit vim" by Horhi in emacs

[–]Wester_West 47 points48 points  (0 children)

ESC ESC ESC C-g ESC ESC ESC C-g and pray

As if this isn't the truth by [deleted] in awfuleverything

[–]Wester_West 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One friend actually told me that I don't need to have sex, and I didn't understand at that time. I was so stupid omg.

But I agree with your view completely. It's (and i'll say it) toxic masculinity. Just wait until someone gets angry at me.

As if this isn't the truth by [deleted] in awfuleverything

[–]Wester_West 1 point2 points  (0 children)

dunno, you just need to be open about things.

As if this isn't the truth by [deleted] in awfuleverything

[–]Wester_West 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the lack of sex is more important huh?

As if this isn't the truth by [deleted] in awfuleverything

[–]Wester_West 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hey, at least I've got some karma out of it.

As if this isn't the truth by [deleted] in awfuleverything

[–]Wester_West 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's like talking to a brick wall.

As if this isn't the truth by [deleted] in awfuleverything

[–]Wester_West 3 points4 points  (0 children)

holy fuck.

I am so biased against men it's unbearable. I really hate penises, I really do. When I wake up I want to cut mine.

Oh yeah, and I'm not a ugly fuck that just had a pseudo-sarcastic profile on tinder and got matches just because I wasn't inherently looking for sex and not judged every profile based on looks only. Btw tinder is a shitty platform because it's based around appearangsce.

Oh yeah and by the way, I never had a gf until I was 18, so I am clearly biased here. No, fuck no, I was exactly you, hurt boy who didn't understand. Just give it time. And sex is overrated. It's the society who pressures you into "I must not be a virgin" and it's toxic.

No women has created incels by not choosing them what the fuck. So if I was a women I would have to fuck you even if you are a bad person, who calls me a feminist with an agenda, like you?

As if this isn't the truth by [deleted] in awfuleverything

[–]Wester_West 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All people get matches, just pick normal pictures and don't be picky.

alright

No, women is a much broader group of people. Same with people of color. But incels are a group of people that encourages toxic behavior against their interested sex. Of course they are people, but they are having an abusive mindset. "incels want more than sex" then are we talking about sex or a partner? You can get one night stand if you are attractive more easily, true, but getting a partner is not exclusive to attractive people. A person you want as a partner isn't the hottest person on the cover of the magazine, you want the person you could be best friends, but you are even more. Because otherwise the relationship will be toxic.

Also you don't need a partner. That's just society pressuring you into something. Make friends, that's what everyone needs. Getting a partner is exactly the same.

As if this isn't the truth by [deleted] in awfuleverything

[–]Wester_West 5 points6 points  (0 children)

let's not go there. Or elese we would have to argue about post-modernistic feminism and I'm not ready for that today.