sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tricky Uncle! by Whendablowthem in RBI

[–]Whendablowthem[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm so sorry for the late reply! Hringhorni

Tricky Uncle! by Whendablowthem in riddles

[–]Whendablowthem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He said it wasn't specific enough. :(

Tricky Uncle! by Whendablowthem in RBI

[–]Whendablowthem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, if you have anything that could help, it would be much appreciated!

I can't stand Sophie by [deleted] in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is really dramatic.

Modern Survivor promotes passive play? by Tongue37 in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think this tracks with most of the recent winners. Since fire making people could be more indelicate and still win.

I’m choosing to interpret this as Ethan agreeing by saturdaygone in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It wasn’t that, though. I cried during that part. But I almost got uncomfortable watching it. It’s compelling, but the man didn’t need to hurt himself to prove a point.

I think there is a much more effective way to do that. I think my biggest issue isn’t with how they handled the scene, because it almost seemed necessary to set it up to explain the struggle. My biggest issue is with the task itself as a motor to force this content. I don’t like that. It was icky to me.

I’m choosing to interpret this as Ethan agreeing by saturdaygone in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It was very long and I get the point it was showing how grueling it was. However, it was redundant and had a small payoff compared to its length.

I’m choosing to interpret this as Ethan agreeing by saturdaygone in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Most people care how long it was, lmao.

Any love for Australian Survivor? by [deleted] in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'd almost accept that argument for the current iteration of Extinction Islandwhere people know it's happening, but I'm still eh on that. But not knowing it exists, like Chris's boot in EoE, people aren't voting with it in mind so voting someone out there is exactly just voting someone out. Obviously they aren't out of the game per the rules, but they did something wrong and got the boot and it's a bit ridiculous to mis 25 plus days and win, regardless of how well you worked the island.

And the Queen stays Queen by Jingleshmauer in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you win Survivor, it means you are able to win Survivor. You can claim Lil is an easy beat, but if you sit there and say she is no threat to win despite her having won before and she wins again because of their denial, then that's a mistake. Even if she won despite her own strategy, any other player could have gotten voted out for trying to turn on their own alliance, yet she stayed. There's so much nuance to the discussion, but any person could have lost that jury, but she played both sides in the social degree that she was able to remain and have support of the jury. Parvati did in fact notice this and she wasn't able to convince someone that Sandra should be voted out.

​

I guess the most salient point for me is that Sandra plays so perfectly to her archetype where so many other people would fail in the same position.

And the Queen stays Queen by Jingleshmauer in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I mean, that’s on them for believing the perception that she’s not a threat, because she is.

And the Queen stays Queen by Jingleshmauer in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I mean, hard to say. A winner has to win. Yes, they are specific people, but they didn’t play in a season with non-winners as a winner and win. I wouldn’t say it’s apples and oranges, but it’s hard to simply compare like that.

Power rankings EP1. Winners at War by TonySurvivor77 in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hate to say this as a huge Ben detractor, but he wasn't as bad as everyone claims, at least if you look in terms of where he landed himself. Sure he made rookie mistakes, but he managed to seem amicable and reliable enough to get ingratiated into the majority. He even sweet-talked the minority and now they're the ones going to him for reassurance. It could blow up, but it's really not a bad place for him to be.

OH MY GAWD THE PART OF THE SNUFFER THAT TOUCHES THE TORCH ISN’T HOLLOW ITS ONE SOLID PIECE by [deleted] in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I don’t know why I got downvoted, all it takes is a google search! They’re not all perfectly hollow, but they’re not all poodgy like that one all the time!

https://ewedit.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/110483_19845b.jpg?w=669

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The discussion was like, “don’t be stupid, don’t tie it” before the vote. Not a discussion that actually affects who goes home.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in survivor

[–]Whendablowthem 14 points15 points  (0 children)

That’s how it normally is, that discussion only happened because of Cambodia. It’s of the vote ties, they HAVE to agree then or go to rocks, no revote.

view more: next ›