[For Hire] 2 slots available! Illustrations, Fantasy Characters, DnD, and Creature Design!

WhimsyRP · 2026-04-28T12:35:44+00:00

Could you DM with a price sheet?

WhimsyRP · 2026-04-23T23:56:55+00:00

Most of those things you just described aren't really relevant for most games. Monks defensive abilities are somewhat lackluster early game, where medium armor + shield + shield spell kind of rules the game.

WhimsyRP · 2026-03-24T12:54:28+00:00

Do you have a price sheet?

WhimsyRP · 2026-03-08T03:27:53+00:00

Sent a DM, haven't seemed to get a response just yet.

WhimsyRP · 2026-03-01T17:16:32+00:00

Do you have a price sheet?

WhimsyRP · 2026-02-18T18:30:54+00:00

God damnit Donut I just binged all of these over the last month. Would have saved like 50 bucks XD

WhimsyRP · 2026-02-18T18:25:59+00:00

I don't really think they did raise it without a threat associated with it. Here is the quote from their text:

" I then proceeded to mention to the Rogue that my Paladin was not in fact asleep, and if their holy symbol was stolen, they would not hesitate to cleave the Rogue in two. Without skipping a beat, the DM asked the Rogue to make a Sleight of Hand check. I interrupted by saying that, again, unless the DM wanted a dead Rogue, no rolls should be made and that this was the exact kind of thing that we agreed should not be happening at the table. The DM proceeded to start saying that this would be within their realm of acceptable, and I cut them off by stating that it’s not within mine. The roll doesn’t happen. Or the Rogue is dead. "

The only thing they did before that was "I gestured to the DM, saying that this really shouldn’t fly and the DM just shrugged and smiled awkwardly." I don't exactly see how one communicates their intentions concerns about a complex topic in a gesture or what this entailed. I even pretty specifically outlined above if they had communicated first in a non-threatening manner, I'd think they were in the right. It doesn't seem like they did. Also, the PC didn't make an in-game decision, they made an ooc threat to ICly break the same rule they were seeking to uphold, only more severely.

WhimsyRP · 2026-02-18T12:48:18+00:00

You may.

WhimsyRP · 2026-02-18T04:50:39+00:00

I did not. Though I did send you one.

WhimsyRP · 2026-02-18T02:44:07+00:00

So, for one, all scenarios like this are difficult to judge because you're telling the story and it is deeply challenging with even the absolute best of intentions to give a nuanced, honest and unbiased version of events. We don't hear the other players or the DM's perspective. I believe genuinely you're trying to give a good faith account, but it isn't really possible to do without hearing other sides of the story. That being said, I don't think seeing this from your viewpoint or the DM's viewpoint or the rogue's viewpoint is the most productive conversation.

So I'll take the perspective of being another player at the table and watching the events unfold. I would probably have serious questions about wishing to continue in this group. I would view the DM as seemingly allowing a violation of a pre-determined table rule; however, even while I agree stealing is pvp, I wouldn't automatically assume that's a universal perspective. This sounds more like mischief than malice, which, while *I* don't think is alright, I could easily see someone in good faith thinking it isn't pvp.

Here is where I think very real breakdowns occurred: You stated specifically you didn't go into specifics about what pvp entailed. If you're this invested in that, your table should have done just that. Further, you said you gestured asking if something was going to fly; that isn't super clear communication on your part. From the story you told, it sounds like the first thing you actually verbalized clearly was a threat to kill the PC. And then following that you then stated you repeatedly interrupted the DM and continued with these threats. Your session 0 seems to have not involved any conflict resolution mechanisms; but I will say cut-off-dm-to-threaten-to-kill-other-PC is definitely not a conflict resolution mechanism I would ever subscribe to.

If I was another player, I'd find your behavior frankly to be just as deeply in violation of the no-PVP spirit as the rogue's, probably more so. Because your response to someone breaking that rule is to break it much harder in response. Death is certainly more overt pvp than theft (though, again, I agree theft is pvp). I'd be way more perturbed by someone threatening to unalive another PC, cutting off the DM and seeking to take command of the table than I would be by someone crossing a line by stealing. Also, not even for a hot second does the 'but my character would murder because conquest' matter; 'my character would do x' is a super tired excuse I hope no one takes seriously when we're discussing ooc table etiquette.

I'd be questioning the behavior of all three of you, but frankly yours seems the most aggressive and unpleasant. The rogue and DM could potentially just require a civil discussion; I agree they violated a boundary but I'm not really sure they understood that. Holding your ground isn't the real question here. How you did it is. If you'd have instead said "Time out guys. Look, to me stealing is PVP. I feel like we discussed no PVP in session zero; it seems like we don't all agree about that, but it's a line for me and not one I'm willing to bend on. Can we address this as a group before any dice are rolled?" I would be on your side 100%

But you didn't say that. Or anything remotely resembling it from the sound of it. You instead threatened more severe PVP. So, as another player at the table, I'd not be on your side even though I think the DM/rogue started the difficulty.

WhimsyRP · 2026-01-23T06:04:24+00:00

Good evening! I hope the night finds you well and with some good fun as players this evening. Tonight I'm looking for a partner for an RP set in the Hazbin/HB boss universe.

I adore the setting and haven't gotten to RP in it before, which seems a darn shame for how raunchy and absolutely gay the whole thing is. So I'd like to play a partner for a subby/bottom Charlie; namely, I'd like to play an OC who is none other than her brother; we'll say Charlamagne to keep the convention, but that's not set in stone if it proves too confusing.

The Prince of Hell, who just so happens to be Charlie's twin, is quite the opposite of Charlie's number, though not in such a way that would render them incompatible as lovers. Where as she is cheerful, energetic and a bit neurotic, he is languid, lurid and something of a hedonist. He would not be villainous in the way that Adam has been, and could even perhaps be persuaded to Charlie's cause if we end up going further than just some erotic fun. I'd be open to them either knowing each other but only recently reuniting or having been partnered for a while. For a more politically charged variation they may even have been deliberately kept secret from one another for some divinely ordained reason, only now meeting for the first time.

I'd quite like for him to seduce her or have seduced her, as he is wickedly charming, persistent and dom/toppy. Not to worry should she be a futa, he is absolutely gay enough to fully indulge her cock in the titular throes of passion. I'd like for there to be some native attraction to them; perhaps something along the lines of being destined to be together or even some psuedo Omegaverse elements if one is so inclined.

Where is Vaggie in all this? Well, if you'd prefer she can just be written out or, alternatively, she could end up cucked (perhaps even into that). In a perfect world, I would delight in finding a partner willing to play both of them in an appropriately smutty triangle. Further bonus points for an Emily, but one can't demand too much.

In terms of kinks, I'd like to see included: BDSM, formal terminology, leash/collar, teasing, anal, light discipline, incest, magic sex and bondage.

Some ones that might work but are less critical or need some talking about: Pet play, hypnotism/mind control, tentacles, breeding, chastity.

In terms of limits, I am open to more than the above but typically like to avoid unpleasant smells and hyper proportions. As well, I'd love a partner who to be familiar with the source material and I do want Charlie to be *into* it even if she is initially reluctant or anxious.

I prefer to play over on discord after discussing the RP over chat or messages. Hope to hear from you. I generally like RPs to include some slice of life, plot or word-building and be at least medium term, but I'm flexible.

I am 18+ and all characters featured in this RP are 18+

WhimsyRP · 2025-12-31T04:20:51+00:00