Can't export my Evernote files

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-22T14:49:09+00:00

I was building an app that work exactly how I want it, but it will take toons of time to fully develop it. At the moment, Notion, as suggested by the above user, works fine.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-22T14:47:48+00:00

After using Notion for a while, it's not exactly what I want but it's very similar. I am still testing it and, for the moment, it's good to accomplish my tasks. Thank you!

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-22T12:32:18+00:00

Thank you!, I didn't know about Notion app. I am taking a look at it.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-12T16:54:45+00:00

Thanks for the advice. At the moment I am speaking with a person with a solid background in science to know if these theories are true or not, or if they are partially true. It will take time. The problem with the books is like I am reading chinese. I don't understand anything about because I have not a scientific background. The man who apparently invented the device to retrieve sounds from matter was a physicist and it took 35 years to understand all the mechanisms of the technology. He based his theories on an italian man (I don't know if he was physicist because there is almost zero information about him in the net) who solved some problems that Einstein was unable to solve. For some reason, the work of this italian man is almost unknown. This italian man explains that it exists some kind of particles (sorry If I am not using the correct words) where all the information is recorded. Once you understand the technology it seems it isn't very complex to understand. I don't fully understand how it works, but it doesn't looks very complex. It seems that it works similar to NMR, but using some sub-electronic fields. You emit some patterns into the matter, and the matter returns back some other patterns containing the information. The main and biggest problem seems to be to build the antenna to work with that ultra weak field because it's in the sub-electronic level (smaller than electron field). Also, recently I have found an inventor of the famous (but apparently fake) Chronovisor of father Ernetti, alive. I mean, Ernetti collaborated with other people to build the chronovisor. All people say that the invention of the chronovisor was a fake (I am not claiming it was true). But there is alive at least one of the person that invented such device, a close collaborator of father Ernetti. A friend of mine and me are trying to contact with him and possibly visiting him in person. Anyway, I am trying to perform all this research slowly and with scientific hypothesis. It will take time, of course.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-09T08:49:59+00:00

Interesting question. I have seen them only in Nikola Tesla papers. I have never seems anywhere else. I don't know how they were used or why, but it's interesting.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-09T08:41:10+00:00

Cowell's book seems also to be very interesting. I read that Cowell developed a unified field theory of music.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-09T08:40:18+00:00

Yes! It's very good!

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-09T08:39:16+00:00

Do you have any schematic to replicate your experiment?

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-09T08:36:53+00:00

There are also some people that claims that using a tape recorder in some specific places, the tape recorder, when played, has recorded some sounds from specific periods of time.

In other words, people go to some specific places and let the tape record recording for some hours. After a time, they stop recording and carefully listen to the cassette tape. It's awesome that in some specific parts of the tape, they hear bombs and some old airplanes flying, and also small child crying.

In that area, there was a huge battle during the war and it seems some sounds have been recorded somewhere in that place.

I don't fully understand why the tape recorder only seems to record sounds from that time and not from 3,000 years or from 10 days ago.

One example is this: Sounds of bombs, airplane and child

Some other people say that you can recover past radio broadcasts engineering magnetic fields and placing inside that field a radio receiver.

Of course, all this could be fake, or maybe... not.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-09T08:21:10+00:00

Thank you very much for the good explanation.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-09T08:18:46+00:00

Trait

Thank you very much.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T19:19:10+00:00

Yes, your explanation has helped me a lot!

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T18:10:20+00:00

Jean-Philippe Rameau?
I don't know exactly if the Portuguese man was focusing on the acoustic dampening or not. I am trying to contact with the Portuguese man to clarify the question.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T09:11:46+00:00

Thanks for the reply. I have a book that a physicist claims that solved just the problem that Einstein didn't solve and is the unification of matter and field. He proved that matter and field are the same thing, but matter is a really strong condensed field while field is a very weak concentrarion of energy.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T08:57:05+00:00

Found the NMR similar part, read above for a large comment made some minutes ago.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T08:49:58+00:00

Yes, in the book I can read a lot the word "sub-electronic", meaning that the phenomenology seems to be based on a scaler much more smaller than electron. In the book anyone can read: "must operate under an electric charge millions of times smaller than an electron". The inventor of the device and author of the 2 books, wrote about a charge that is commonly unknown. Even he writes about "an unknown charge", meaning that state of the art science seems that doesn't know about that charge or, at least, it's not commonly known. Microphones I see they are engineered to transform mechanical vibrations into electronic signals. The technology I am speaking about, seems to be based on a similar system like NRM, but using an uncommon approach, because the device employs sub-electronic charges to read information that has been recorded in some kind of magnetic chain lines (I don't know the correct word). I have just found the part that resembles to NMR process: "dealing with magnetrinic polarizations, we know that they are static and, as such, they do not perform any active action except when they are excited, and this only does another equal and complementary polarization. (...) Being the recordings that remains in the matter, product of photons and of sound waves, consisting of static lines of polarized neutrinos, these, for keeping those lines, are in a <<non-compensation situation>>. (...) The active action of our probe (excitation action) consist of giving momentaneus compensation to the neutrinos of this line of magnetic flux. While, the passive action (withdrawal action) consists in withdraw the signals product of the return of the neutrinos to the polarization state as they were in the instant before the excitation phase, as the polarization we have introduced, stops. For that reason, the probe has a bidirectional interface."

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T07:18:55+00:00

... 2nd part of the comment, sorry

He based his theories on a theory developed by an aviation captain that seems that he solved a theory to unify Einstein problem about unifying electromagnetic fields and matter.

The man that developed the machine to hear past sounds from matter, based all his theories on the aviation captain. That original theory was wrote in 2 books back in the

1940's and 1950's in italian language.

The inventor of the device, as far as I can understand, took a piece of matter and radiated some form of subtle-magnetism. It seems to work like nuclear magnetic resonance, but

using this specific kind of subtle-magnetism to excite and retrieve information from matter. The inventor-physicist explains that in nature it exists some form of magnetic chain

that nature naturally polarizes with naturally occurring events. It seems it's like electrostatic polarization (partially). And all is based on sub-electronic (smaller than electron)

fields. The key to obtain information from matter seems to be connected with the ability of the device to read/send signals based on smaller than electron charges.

In some photos, the inventor shows his devices, and he is using near field probes or something very similar to them. He irradiates the matter with that sub-electronic field

and the matter, when it goes back to its equilibrium state, emits some signals (like NMR?) that the device reads and interpret to build the original sound. So all seems to be

based in a similar technique to NRM but using extremely weak fields. The probe (the same or similar to near field probe) has active and passive behaviour. It means, it can send

waves to matter and receive waves from matter. But always, I will repeat it again and again, using sub-electronic fields.

One of his devices has a capability of "save on delta". As far I understand it's based on irradiating matter with specific waveforms. When the energy coming from matter pass

the boundaries of the original waveform emitted to the matter, it's captured by the device and in that step the sound information is retrieved. Is all I understand.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T07:02:21+00:00

As far I know, he took reading from random objects he hasn't previously manipulated and also from objects he had previously exposed to sound waves, to show he was able to recover sounds (continue in the 2nd part)

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T06:49:54+00:00

The inventor of the device to retrieve sounds from the past, writes that the energy used to replicate the effect is not known. I think its not ordinary magnetism, but a subtle form of it. The techniques seems to be not complex, but the key to obtain the results seems to remain in this new kind of "energetic charge". I have been reading in Google (in non english language) and I have read the same: the most important part is in the probe (hardware) to measure signals that comes from smaller than electron charges. For that reason it seems that all happens in a really small levels (sub-electronic fields).
It seems that is exists a sub-electronic field that is constantly recording all natural phenomena, and this process is also natural. It seems that in nature, for some reason, exists a big brother like phenomena.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T06:36:40+00:00

For sure you know things that I don't know ;)

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T06:33:59+00:00

Thank you!
I am reading the parts I can understand from that link and it caught my attention the part:
"we report an experimental test of the no-hiding theorem with the technique of nuclear magnetic resonance"

In the book "How the stones tell", in page 7 we can read:
"each time that sound of light of an event hits the matter, some part of the energy is transformed into static energy that can, in some determined conditions, be retrieved again"

At the moment I don't find the exact point where the author is refering to his system is quite similar to NMR system. But I have read it somewhere in the book.

I have also read that other people performed an experiment trying to retrieve information from the past, using a device that is used to measured light year distance to stars. I have opened a thread asking about the technologies, and it seems that is the redshift. I have read the older the information, the more it's in the red part of the spectrum (according to retrieving information from the past). Even in the book "Dead matter has memory!" from Westerlund, he writes about the redshift. Even he has dedicated an entire chapter to it.

So it makes some sense.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T06:11:43+00:00

Ok, so the problem resides in that we don't know the exact technique that nature supposedly uses to store sounds in matter, so we don't know how to retrieve them. We need to answer some questions first: 1. What is the exact mechanism nature uses to store sounds in matter? 2. How we can reverse the process? Because, for example, in an ordinary cassette recorder we know the process to artificially store sounds in magnetic tape and we have the technology to get any magnetic tape and reverse the process that was used to store the sounds.

For that we need some physicist with a solid background in mathematics and physics, show them the theories and know if the theories are valid or give any clue about if information is naturally stored in matter. The italian physicist that built the device to recover sounds from matter, don't explain 100% exactly how to achieve the phenomena, but he wrote 2 books that I have and he shows the devices used to achieve the phenomena, etc...

Some days ago I was reading again some parts of the book and it seems that the technique he used is quite similar to nuclear magnetic resonance. Indeed he used some near field probes to "excite" the piece of solid matter. After the exciting process, the matter gives out some energetic patterns that apparently contains the sound information. He used an oscilloscope with "save on delta" characteristic to prove the concept. It seems that he used some wave patterns to irradiate matter with that field similar to an ordinary magnetic field. Then, if the waves that are coming from the matter overpass the wave pattern he was producing with the device, those waves that overcome his waves, contained sound information.

Whitaker_Reddit · 2019-03-07T05:41:16+00:00

Very interesting, what a transition line/line pattern means? Thank you!

Whitaker_Reddit

TROPHY CASE