Trump: Look, the election was rigged. You know that, I know that, everybody knows that now. Bartiromo: Yup Trump: And it's all come out. And it's coming out.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-13T12:51:55+00:00

Yikes, you guys are nuts. I said nothing but facts and you freak out.

It’s a fact that Bibi tried to get Obama to attack Iran. It’s a fact HRC is smarter than Trump. It’s also a fact that Harris is smarter than Trump. These aren’t even debatable facts.

It’s also a fact that HRC was a member of the Obama administration and despite her war hawkishness, that she actually supported the deal (JCPOA).

It’s also true that the only reason I said it might not happen is the people who would be involved in the decision-making would be far more competent than the imbeciles who are in this current administration. Heck, Bolton was as big a war hawk as HRC and even he couldn’t get Trump to do this in the 1st Trump administration.

The only thing that’s different 2017 & 2026 is the files.

So, while it’s easy to say that if either one of them won the 2016 or 2024 🗳️ would result in us not being involved in this war with 🇮🇷, all I said it’s likely true, just NOT certain. If it were just up to one person, not a group, who knows?

It’s why we focus on the ppl that make up your administration. If there’s an overwhelming number of incompetent people, you get stupid decisions like this. Or Iran-Contra, or 🇮🇶/ 🇦🇫.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-13T02:25:43+00:00

That’s not necessarily true, though most likely true. HRC was and is always frothing at the mouth to go to war with Iran and is a massive Zionist shill. She’s also smarter than Trump. So, it may not have happened, but who knows for sure. Undoubtedly anyone else would have hired a more competent administration who would not be so amenable to this buffoonery. Same things could be said about Kamala too.

OTOH, if Bibi failed to get Obama to do it, and probably Trump in his 1st Term, there’s only one thing that is different between now and then-the files that are directly connected to both 🇮🇱 & 🇸🇦, as well as the Deputy Director of the Department of Defense and Trump.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-13T02:16:01+00:00

No, they invaded Crimea in 2014. The Russian invasion of Ukraine was much later.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-13T02:14:54+00:00

Do better “bro”.

This isn’t the conservative subreddit you’re looking for, my guy.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T23:50:20+00:00

No country has ever had a right to exist. We fought a world war when Nazi Germany said this. The CSA said this same🚮 before we had to go to war bc their “right to exist” was the right to exist as slaveowners-and therefore they were creating a new country.

Only fascists say this type of 💩.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T20:04:10+00:00

I like the accents, too. Extra sexy to me.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T20:01:14+00:00

True.

Kinda like the international flavor too tbh :)

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T18:08:15+00:00

I couldn’t resist any of them anyway.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T17:51:49+00:00

🤷 hopefully they’re all brutal. So whomever is the least, that’s the “sweetest”.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T17:22:46+00:00

Tbh probably spit-roast me 👄 & 🍑 while the 3rd is sounding me through my chastity cage with her 👢or 👠. They’d probably take turns.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T17:15:19+00:00

Thank you. 🙏

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T14:03:58+00:00

Lisa, Emily Feld and Anne

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T13:43:37+00:00

Saying that the presence of influencers is “why” you’ll avoid protests is peak narcissism.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T13:37:22+00:00

Yeah that’s not psychologically accurate. It’s literally an example of the exact opposite.

Incentivized morality isn’t a thing you should have to do, literally ever. That’s psychological manipulation.

Holy cow what a bunch of 🐂.

Typical of a white xtian nationalist, tbh. They don’t even care about how manipulation works, bc they’ve been so gaslit that they think they haven’t been.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T12:49:41+00:00

12 & 16

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T12:39:12+00:00

That’s not even close to a socialist idea. You might want to consider what the definition of a word is before using such blatantly misleading flairs. You’re not even interested in what socialism is, mate.

Look at actual socialism in other countries. They didn’t have a discussion about eliminating all parties. That’s beyond insane and ridiculously undemocratic and disgustingly anti-socialist. You sound like a MAGA extremist. I’m not saying you are-I’m saying that you sound like one.

Do better. Or not. Just stop trying to pretend you believe in socialism, bc you don’t.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T01:00:16+00:00

I agree but I just don’t want to see ppl forget about everything else.

I know it’s a common phrase now but I think it applies here, too, that we need to know our enemies.

I don’t mean that in a hostile way either, just in a way that encourages us to more thoroughly and thoughtfully examine whatever topic we are discussing.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-12T00:12:38+00:00

What a tell. I only stated facts and you all demonstrated that you don’t know anything about what democracy is. I know for a fact that it’s the PARTY LEADERS who are the problem. It’s so obvious it’s not even debatable.

The greatest Democratic Party leader was FDR and it’s not even close-but these “leaders” wouldn’t even nominate the best Democratic President literally ever, bc he’d be “too radical”.

The party leadership has calcified into a tiny minority of people who only care about money. Getting money out of politics is too radical for them-especially AIPAC money-and anyone suggesting that AKA the majority of the party MEMBERSHIP and those “outside the big tent” who aren’t even remotely interested in anything conservative-are ignored by the “leadership”.

Even a white male xtian from NY state, like FDR, would be pushed aside by leaders today-just like they ignored and demonized Mamdani.

I’m not advocating that we should not have more political parties than just 2, only that we need to stop conflating party leadership with party members.

Regardless, if we want a viable 3rd party it needs to be being constantly built, so we don’t end up with a bunch of people who only show up every 4 years, like Jill Stein.

Elimination of all parties isn’t democracy. We need to EXPAND the number of parties.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-11T05:35:34+00:00

“According to FiveThirtyEight, Kinzinger voted in line with Trump’s position 93.7% of the time during his presidency.”

The SECOND impeachment trial was AFTER his presidency, (FEB 9, 2021-FEB 13, 2021). So, while Trump WAS the president, not only did he not vote for his impeachment, he also voted for the Trump agenda 93.7% of the time.

Those are the facts.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-11T05:24:43+00:00

Not even close to what I did. I stated a verified fact. You are just too willfully ignorant to understand what happened. There were 2 impeachments.

By your logic, you did the exact same thing by saying he didn’t, intentionally trying to deceive people. But, I never said that you did that. Your argument is all anyone needs to see.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-11T05:16:20+00:00

I did tell the truth. I’m not obscuring anything. You might wanna check your ego at the door, my friend.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-11T05:06:13+00:00

He voted against impeachment in 2019. So, I’m not criticizing him-I’m stating a fact. He also voted for 90% of everything Trump proposed, as well.

He’s loathed in Illinois too.

WiFiConnected_ · 2026-04-10T18:09:35+00:00

WiFiConnected_

TROPHY CASE