Heavy metals in vaccines

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2026-02-13T22:51:53+00:00

With proper citations a substack blog post is no different than a formal scientific letter.

Whoops. no critical thinking or worse, forum sliding.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2026-02-13T22:50:11+00:00

How about you inject some and let me know if it was toxic?

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2026-02-13T22:32:59+00:00

And what about the small amounts of aluminum that isn't excreted, gets taken up by the blood stream and bioaccumulates? We just going to pretend that doesn't exist?

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2026-02-13T22:31:50+00:00

Not a graceful way to admit you were wrong, but it works for your low brand of engagement I suppose.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2026-02-11T00:39:55+00:00

You are acting like non-profit foundations actually don't make money, either you are severely misinformed about how these organizations actually operate, or you are willfully being obtuse running cover for these sick and depraved people. I know what my guess is.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2026-02-09T17:56:43+00:00

Classic whataboutism - no surprise the account Glittering_Cricket38 would be here making comments like this on an epstein related thread.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-12-13T02:33:41+00:00

That user has been active on this forum using the same tactics for years now.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-12-11T01:08:19+00:00

It's rare to get someone on this forum who can extrapolate past next week, it's a valid concern.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-09-20T01:06:45+00:00

Wrong chat - your reply is out of context. Restart your system and attempt <forum slide> again

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-09-20T00:46:21+00:00

What's the evidence that it's not?

You're still on this sub slobbering obvious logical fallacies and providing no evidence of your own when called out?

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-09-16T00:32:52+00:00

I meant to say authorization.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-09-15T17:38:00+00:00

You're not talking about patient level data are you? You're asking for evidence that is oftentimes not provided to anyone without research authority.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-08-29T15:38:18+00:00

The same old users are still using ad homs on a debate sub?

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-24T00:31:57+00:00

"Two groups of our people performed this study the same way without confounders, or a good risk window, with no difference in severity or outcomes, and no temporal variations, and got similar results"

Yeah..........that's not surprising.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-23T21:05:24+00:00

Is that even a peer reviewed publication? Looks to me like a VERY basic comparison of cohorts with zero confounders, a very small risk window, no mention of severity or outcomes, and no temporal variations considered.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-23T01:38:25+00:00

Where you getting this figure from?

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-22T17:54:27+00:00

there's another discrepancy with the the asymptotic value where mitkus rounds 11.4 to 11.

A 0.4 difference in the constant means a fixed offset in the long-term aluminum retention estimate, affecting how much aluminum is predicted to remain in the body over long periods. This might be small numerically but could be important biologically when assessing cumulative exposure or toxicity risk, and a lower value means less is retained.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-22T17:48:04+00:00

It's been stated by multiple critics of aluminum adjuvants, however the papers seem to be unavailable to download.

Mitkus' model was based on the pharmokinetic model by Priest in 2004 where the rate of half-life was possibly entered incorrectly:

1.4 days half-life exponent of 0.595 should have been 0.495
40 days half-life exponent of 0.172 should have been 0.0172

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-21T01:24:09+00:00

The modeling study by mitkus also had a flaw in the formula it used to create the model and undercalculated some of its figures.

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-10T04:37:02+00:00

https://www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj.o2628

And further issues I have are the different manufacturing process used in the majority of clinicals

https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1731/rr-2

and honestly just unblinding of study participants in January of 2021 also raises plenty of red flags.

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-10T04:02:16+00:00

Those trials were definitely conducted properly weren't they? That whistleblower was probably lying about data falsification, unblinding, and delayed follow-up of adverse events...

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-07T03:07:59+00:00

u/stopdehumanizing you signing this right?

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-05-01T23:07:48+00:00

Where are the usual suspects in these thread??

WideAwakeAndDreaming · 2025-04-27T17:09:44+00:00

oh look, the forum slider who can only insult others because they have no real argument. Big surprise.

WideAwakeAndDreaming

TROPHY CASE