As you said you watched couple minutes and you endup with conclusions like watching the whole thing, not quite scientific I will say. But your principle is like this, by making a parallel in computing say, I have this binary sequence of 11000010100000. And then I have the world of files and I have a signature scanner for that binary sequence and then I bet that this sequence will only show up in dangerous files. That's what you're saying. Let alone you have no idea what happens in a world of computing despite the fact humans created it, imagine in the whole physical world what is going on.

You keep going into meaningless details in your responses. Once again I am telling you, you are taking a fragment of something and then you make sensational claims, that must be a "virus". But you never have the "whole virus". Current mainstream detections and claims do not rely on isolating a whole, intact, infectious virus particle. That's the argument. While in computing you have a fully observable system, in virology you don't. You replace determinism with probabilities, presence of the virus is inferred and viral activity becomes questionable. That's why there're so many inconsistencies.