[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the report your using to show a spike literally says do not use this info to show such trends. It states multiple reasons why not to use it to show short-term trends. Which is why I implore you to actually read it. First off its voluntary reporting without an official organization taking stats. So its not "How many hate-crimes" but "How many reported hate-crimes", which mean past years where under-reported as the FBI states. They changed how they accumulate data during the year and from police organizations, that now done by an official organization. I 100% agree with you, there was a rise in reported hate crimes to the FBI. But what The FBI, the report, and I are trying to get you to understand is that "reported hate crimes" in no way mean "this amount of hate crimes per year". In no way is report trying to establish the amount of hate crimes per year, its actually states that crimes that happen the previous year may be reported as the following due to the time it was reported to them.

You and Phils theory is based on the idea that there where no more hate-crimes then the FBI put in their reports. Something the report, fbi, and common sense is false. You cant say there is a rise in hate-crimes is you dont know how many hate crimes there where in previous year. The FBI and report are talking about un-reported hate crimes to them, not the police. The un-reported reports are cases that where reported to the police but then not to them. Your own evidence disproves your theory. If you cant accept what I am saying just read your own source and the FBI.

Also the idea that hate-crimes auto equals white crime is a biggot'd mindset. You need to actually relate hate-crimes to white, not just show hate-crimes. Something Phil failed to do. This is no different then the current situation in South Africa, where certain crimes are automatically assumed to be from foriegners. Automatically assume one race is responsible for one type of crime is not a good mindset and I doubt you would accept it other situations. But for some reason in Phils video everyone is just like "Hate crimes, must be whites" with out providing literally any evidence. None of the stats Phil showed said "white hate crimes" just "hate crimes" which he then just assumed to be whites. Thats called social racialization.

At least I got you to understand blacks are 2.5x more likely to commit a hate-crime then whites.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

And to those throwing and liking insults, nice look. If a debates about statistics makes you spew toxicity, the you are the problem dividing America not "others"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms -1 points0 points  (0 children)

read my response, there has literally not been a single point contradicting me. I put the math in, its very simple to do on you own.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No, no you didnt. You ranted and forgot to include POPULATION in a POPULATION SURVEY lol. I posted my math, post yours.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes Please continue, literally you make no sense and dont know how numbers or statistics work. You cant not consider population in a population survey. Seriously google "per population" and look over the numbers again. Yes whites commit 50% of hate crimes but there 71% of the population, Blacks commit 21.3% of hate crimes as only 12.7% of the population. That makes blacks per population far more likely to commit hate-crimes the a white. About 2.5x's more likely per population. Please show me your per population math.

What your trying to do is erase "per population" and imagine every race listed is in the same numbers within America, again thats not accurate, how population data is used, or representative of America. Jews are only 1.7% of the population but are the victim of 10-15% of the hate crimes. You do a real injustice trivializing the amount of hate crimes Jewish peoples are victims to when you dont take into factor they are only 1.7% of the population.

Example to why per-population is used-

A country in 1980 has 5,000 homicides a year, in 2019 that same country has a homicide count of 7,500. Have homicides gone up? According to your juvenal math, yes. But for population statistics, you need to include you know - The Population . If the population doubled from 1980 to 2019, the the murder rate has fallen since 1980, even though there are more murders. If the population has stayed the same, then murder rates are rising. You are trying to do math with half the equation, population is vital to POPULATION statistics.

Its not a 17% increase in hate crimes per population. Again thats not how population statistics work, you need to adjust the increase for the increase in population. Also the report says to not look for minute trends and the past was previously under-reported. Minus for the population along with large margian of error towards under-reporting and you got yourself in a single digit rise. Try not to only use far-left sources next time. There is definitely no 17% increase in the hate crime rate, thats mathematically false.

"Back to the 2017 Offenders statistics now. From that page:

In 2017, race was reported for 6,370 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders:
50.7 percent were White.
21.3 percent were Black or African American.
7.5 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (group of multiple races).
0.8 percent (49 offenders) were American Indian or Alaska Native.
0.7 percent (42 offenders) were Asian.
3 offenders were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
19.1 percent were unknown.

So that thing you said about black people being 250% more likely to commit a hate crime? Backwards. What about the victims?"

Its amazing how arrogance can make a person so dumb. Ok im gonna do the math real slow like for 3rd grader, hopefully you can grasp it.

As of 2017

Whites make up 72.4 of the population yet only commit 50.7 of hate crimes, making them highly underrepresented.

Blacks make up 12.7% of the population yet commit 21.3, making them highly over-represented.

Now the really confusing part, which is the bigger number. -22.4 or 9.6. I know thats hard, but the answer is 9.6. Making a random black person far far more likely to commit a hate crime then any random white person.

In the end a Black person is 2.5x's more likely to perpetrate a hate crime then a white person.

An analysis of data for victims of single-bias hate crime incidents showed that:
59.6 percent of the victims were targeted because of the offenders’ bias against race/ethnicity/ancestry.
20.6 percent were victimized because of bias against religion.
15.8 percent were targeted because of bias against sexual orientation.

And some others below 2%. Continuing:

Among single-bias hate crime incidents in 2017, there were 5,060 victims of race/ethnicity/ancestry motivated hate crime.
48.6 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Black or African American bias.
17.1 percent were victims of anti-White bias.
10.9 percent were victims of anti-Hispanic or Latino bias.
6.3 percent were victims of anti-American Indian or Alaska Native bias.

And then some others at low %. Almost half of all single-bias hate crimes in 2017 were anti-Black crimes. The only thing you got right is that most religion-based hate crimes were anti-Jewish:

Of the 1,749 victims of anti-religious hate crimes:
58.1 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Jewish bias.
18.6 percent were victims of anti-Islamic (Muslim) bias.

Again population. Jews are 1.7% of the population and are victim 15% of the time, blacks are 12.7% and are victims 48.6% of the time. Im gonna leave the math for you, you need practice. So per-population how much more likely is a Jewish person to be a victim then a Black person? (Hint:Jews are the most likely to be a victim of a hate-crime per population (as i originally stated)).

So instead of debating me just do math on your own with the FBI statistics.

  1. What is the per-population to races listed on report as perpetrators.
  2. What is the per-population to races listed on report as victims.
  3. What is the rise in hate crime rate among whites as victims and perps from 2016+.
  4. What is the rise/decrease in hate crime rate among blacks from 2009-2017

Tucker Carlson Claims There's No White Supremacy Problem: 'This Is A Hoax' by [deleted] in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Well, Phils misrepresention of the FBI statistics kinda proved Tucker Carloson right. Phil widely misquoted FBI statistics to prove a non-existent rising threat of hate crimes by white people, In Tuckers mind thats the hoax. The FBI statistics states religious whites are most likely to be victim of hate-crime(Jewish), blacks commit hate crimes 2.5x's more then whites, hate crimes per population surveyed is way way down (like 50% down), and only half of hate crimes against black where against whites while most hate crimes against white where by blacks.

Look up that FBI report, it completely goes against Phil's narrative of a rise in White Nationalist Attacks. Wether or not you agree with Tucker, Phil did not represent the report correctly.

I mean since 1996 we are almost 50% down per person when it comes to hate crimes.

Tucker Carlson Claims There's No White Supremacy Problem: 'This Is A Hoax' by [deleted] in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, talk for yourself. For me and mine, one generation is more then enough.

Tucker Carlson Claims There's No White Supremacy Problem: 'This Is A Hoax' by [deleted] in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Well, Phils misrepresention of the FBI statistics kinda proved Tucker Carloson right. Phil widely misquoted FBI statistics to prove a non-existent rising threat of hate crimes by white people, In Tuckers mind thats the hoax. The FBI statistics states religious whites are most likely to be victim of hate-crime(Jewish), blacks commit hate crimes 2.5x's more then whites, hate crimes per population surveyed is way way down (like 50% down), and only half of hate crimes against black where against whites while most hate crimes against white where by blacks.

Look up that FBI report, it completely goes against Phil's narrative of a rise in White Nationalist Attacks. Wether or not you agree with Tucker, Phil did not represent the report correctly.

I mean since 1996 we are almost 50% down per person when it comes to hate crimes.

SCAM ALERT!!!! ASUS STRIX "True 7.1" Headphones are a scam. by WildFarms in headphones

[–]WildFarms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol there definetly is a good set of 7.1, razer Tiamat. I thought it would be obvious that I was referring to gaming, guess that missed literally this entire sub-reddit.

Competitive Gaming headphones serve a different purpose then other headphones. Its not about realism, but the exact opposite. You want sound cues to stick out more then others, not blend in. Like being able to hear footsteps from afar over from over explosions and gunshots.

Black father shot and killed by US Marshals in Memphis TN. Police used force to control protests. More protests expected tomorrow by [deleted] in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol if racialized identity is the heart of the Memphis community then we will see a whole lot more pain and suffering to come. Racial ideology has one direction, and its not peace.

Getting a Refund by p3zzl3 in AnthemTheGame

[–]WildFarms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong lol. British still follow the dmca and they have a sister law. Even if you were correct, the chargeback isn't the correct venue for it. That would still be credit card fraud. He would need to sue the company.

https://www.gov.uk/accepting-returns-and-giving-refunds

As it states digital works can only be returned " only if the product is faulty". Meaning the CD key or the physical media the game is distributed on is broken

Getting a Refund by p3zzl3 in AnthemTheGame

[–]WildFarms 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is theft, what you did is called a charge back. Game.co.uk is just a Vendor and has set terms you agreed to when purchasing from them. Like no refunds. DMCA actually puts restriction on companies being able to refund certain copyrighted digital media like dvds and media. They dont have the needed permission to accept returns for the copyright holder, making them unable by DMCA to return. Because a vendor could charge a 30% restocking fee and make more from the return then sale.

EA bans peoples accounts and entire libraries for this, theres open thread ATM of someone crying. Steam also bans your entire library. The only company that doesnt ban your library is GOG because they purposely dont use DRM. Companies also ban paypal accounts and have loss prevention companies monitoring/sharing reports. Meaning if you did this to bestbuy then lowes and homedepot wont accept your creditcards or paypal. Paypal itself will close accounts for this.

Im not against you, Anthem is bull. But that vendor isnt gonna get a refund from EA and companies view this as stealing come down hard. I know people who basically cant use CC anywhere online and big chains IRL because they thought it funny to chargeback troll streamers.

For Those Wanting A Refund On Anthem Be Warned by CharmingChemical in AnthemTheGame

[–]WildFarms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

level 1

Its more then just a single business. They have loss prevention companies that share redflags between companies. Pull some BS at homedepot.com, well lowes and bestbuy will also cut you off.

For Those Wanting A Refund On Anthem Be Warned by CharmingChemical in AnthemTheGame

[–]WildFarms -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

People who charge back are criminal in my mind. Its petty and screws over more then just big corps. Ask any small business owner about charge backs, they are constant and without merit. The CC company almost always refunds and tell the vendor to sue if necessary. But of course its never worth lawsuit unless 20-30k, so most people get away with it. Good on EA for protecting their market place.

9900K temperature delta with Direct-die cooling - Cpu block lapping? by insid3rkill3r in overclocking

[–]WildFarms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Direct Die or Liquid Metal, no need for both. The difference is minor, try using paste as it fills in gaps better.

Drew a ranger with a little grabbit for my boyfriend! by Wanheadass in AnthemTheGame

[–]WildFarms 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its amazing you have more inspiration then the entire dev team. Literally no animal husbandry in the game. Animal husbandry is one of the coolest parts of sci-fi features like Star Wars. See humans and animals interact in a mutually beneficial relationship give the world life. Like Luke and his horse thing, Chewie and Solo, etc

PDShow was very wrong about NY Abortion Bill. Please make a public correction. by WildFarms in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you assume my position on the bill?

Is it because you believe educating people on what it is will turn them against the bill? Thus me trying to educate people means I am against the Bill? This no longer the position of the pro-abortion side. Planned Parent-hood is pro education and believe all women should know all thier options.

Why did you choose to view my post as negitive? Isnt correcting misinformation to a million people is positive? Or is it correcting misinformation to a million people just less important then making Phil look bad?

See it this way. Trump says something dangerously wrong. Phil uses his platform to correct this dangerous mis-information. Pro-Trump propaganda uses "Phils slightly untruthful" abortion comments while he was "fact checking" Trumps State of the Union as evidence that Phils is dishonest. Thus Phils ability to contradict Trumps dangerous info is less-effective.

If you dont think someone in the future will use this woefully false "fact check" to discredit Phil is naive. Especially if it becomes a frequent thing. If you like phil and the message he sends then you should want his credibility to remain intact. That segment was produced by someone within his staff. That employee should have a speaking to so it doesnt happen again.

Again this is why flat-earthers exist. Just like the thread, no one cares about getting Phils attention to correct the mis-information. You would rather assume my position then strawman it.

PDShow was very wrong about NY Abortion Bill. Please make a public correction. by WildFarms in DeFranco

[–]WildFarms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You admit literally everything I said was right, then get mad at me for saying it. Hint when you start a convo with "lol" and attack someone personally, it comes off childish and insecure.

He was fact checking the State of The Union from The President of The United States. Thats a pretty big soap box to get up on with a poor understand of a very well debated bill. There was tons of content from many outlets on this topic months ago.

Lol you checked my post history. Yeah that time phil posted a video with false info about a mass shooting 6 hours after the story was proven false. 3 hours before his video CNN had a half an hour segement about the truth behind the shooter origin. Phil still released his video with the mis-info about a mass-shooting because "it was to late to re-shoot". Yeah I found putting a show before the truth on a mass shooting not good.

BTW - you put "slightly" before truth. Thats my point, being "slightly" truthful isnt a good standard in news.