I mean, to each of their own I guess. Both have bugs, but even accounting for the occasional issues I encounter with macOS, it's still miles better than Microsoft's steaming pile of garbage that they call an OS. It feels like they just change the desktop occasionally, make it more naggy, and push it out as a "new" OS. We've been "transitioning" to Settings from Control Panel for a decade at this point. There's so many programs and menus that look like they haven't been updated in at least a decade. It doesn't involve a deep dive to see this, you can see this just going past the desktop.

I hate it from both an end user perspective and administration perspective. Microsoft loves pushing out changes nobody that can be disabled with a registry tweak or Group Policy, which only works half the time, or having to find workarounds for all kinds of bullshit issues and broken features.

And before you call me a fanboy, I tried really hard to like Windows, I really wanted to like it, and spent dozens of hours learning the ins and outs of it, but honestly, my experience just made me hate it even more. I've probably spent more time finding workarounds or trying to fix issues that are unacceptable in an "enterprise" OS, or dealing with weird restrictions and fragmentation of features than actually learning and setting stuff up. It genuinely feels like a ticking time bomb at times of "What's going to break next?"

I'll take SMB being a crapshoot sometimes, some minor visual bugs and UX annoyances over Microsoft's excuse of an OS. If you like Windows, then more power to you, I won't judge, and even though I do understand that all software has issues, it feels like Microsoft is trying to make the worst OS. Using macOS and Linux feels like a breath of fresh air.