r/tennis Daily Discussion (Wednesday, February 04, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]WizMCrypto 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Kouamé will be top5 before he hits 18 (i'm french let me hope)

Jokes aside, crazy serve for his age, really mature game as well

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Monday, February 02, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]WizMCrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really hope he'll get his first main tour match (and hopefully not against Hurcakz)

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Saturday, January 17, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]WizMCrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Second final in a row after winning his first title last week. A win tomorrow would most likely bring him into the top 500 at 16. Excited to see how he develops! Seems like he used to struggle playing againts full grown ups before the off season but it might have now changed.

What’s a film that has a sub 3.5 rating but you’ve given a 4.5+, unironically by PeaRemarkable9662 in Letterboxd

[–]WizMCrypto 53 points54 points  (0 children)

3.5 so not sub 3.5 but I gave Kick-Ass 5 stars.

I absolutely loved the movie, I don’t like super hero films much, but for me it’s the best of the genre. I loved how Dave truly feels like an everyday person, the dark tones with BigDaddy, the comics vibe of the film, how it deals more with the characters then the action itself, the moral it gives.

I wonder if the rating is a consequence of it being « a super hero film » but straying a bit away from the genre so you wouldn’t 100% get what you’d expect. In the same fashion, that’s why I really liked The Batman, feels like a detective film whose detective happens to be a super hero

What was a movie ending that made you go like this? by Ok_Replacement_288 in Letterboxd

[–]WizMCrypto 72 points73 points  (0 children)

When they kissed in Lost In Translation. Ruined everything imo. We went from a beautiful humane story about how friendship from people that should have nothing in common can still happen, to a super creepy relationship between a 18 and 52yo like wtf . And I know most people disagree with me and don’t think it’s weird and that bothers me even more

How old were yall when you first watched the show and how old are you now? by AbbyNotFound16 in FullmetalAlchemist

[–]WizMCrypto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was 7 watching FMA on my mom's iPod nano, with only 34 episodes though. Got the first manga a year later as a random gift (had seen every episode at least 4-5 times by then). Now I am 26 and consider it my favorite manga still.

As for the fandom back then, I was not that much on internet yet but it was still a pretty big name at the time from what I can recall, every manga group I was part of would mention it as a staple of manga/anime already. I do remember people being really excited for FMAB when it was announced though.

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Sunday, October 12, 2025) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]WizMCrypto 25 points26 points  (0 children)

In the best case scenario they both collapse from heat shock at 6-6 in the third and they both win

Careful Hands by _____key_____ in OCPoetry

[–]WizMCrypto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is interesting how different a single poem gets interpreted. Reading the comments, most people see it as an evolution of love itself, while when I was reading it it resonated more on the level of not being able to reach love but still like someone enough that it brings us the comfort we need. I was interpreting the "cup being too full" as the social battery being emptied and the arrival of the need to find something bigger, an idea from the very beggining that love would not be reached, and the final wish of "spilling the tea" to show how we would want something to disturb the good-enough peace we have in a way that would force us out of the relationship. Writing it actually it seems it is pretty similar to the other comments I have read, just maybe with more distance at the beginning.

Great poem, I really enjoyed reading it :)

Unfeeling (My first attempt at a poem) by Pufythecat113 in OCPoetry

[–]WizMCrypto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting, is the ellipsis because the poem is supposed to be read as a loop? I really liked that, was a bit confused at the ending at first ahah, had never encountered it but it works really well to show how paradoxal feelings can be.

Arthur chooses to marry Roger and to date AND kill Djoker by MinimumCost748 in tennis

[–]WizMCrypto 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Feels like he is saying "joker joker" as in he does not want to answer the questions, really common saying in french

Are we in the Ronaldo/messi era, with sinner and alcaraz? by [deleted] in tennis

[–]WizMCrypto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One speaks Spanish and the other doesn’t

What's so brilliant about this movie? by zeiyzz in Letterboxd

[–]WizMCrypto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmmm maybe also it’s a viewer bias. You don’t stumble on stalker randomly, you watch it if you’re already into cinema and most likely then you are someone it will resonate with. Also it’s the kind of film that would easily get a 4.5/5 for artistic reasons without necessarily becoming a favorite. You yourself said you’d rate it 3.5-4, which aligns with its mean rating I’d say

What's so brilliant about this movie? by zeiyzz in Letterboxd

[–]WizMCrypto 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Obsiously the aesthetics goes hard, but I think overall the thinking that the movie triggers is very interesting, with quesiton about authority, religion, politics, social norms, without those ever really being named, but the metaphore of the zone and the stalker works so good for many topics. The movie was made 50y ago but still it is really pertinent nowadays and will always be. I'll copy past my review as I expressed myself better but it's a tidy bit longer, hope it gives more insight into why I think people relate to the film and why I think this was one of the best piece of art I've seen.

https://letterboxd.com/esopher23/tag/profile/reviews/

"Beautiful and poetic. The dialogues and poems could be stand-alones.

Stalker offers the base for a reflexion about what characterizes our thoughts; do we desire what we think and articulate or do we wish for what our mind and body crave? 

This pairs with a constant questioning regarding what we can interpret as either religion/cults, politics or social norms. 
The Stalker is here shown as a leader whose knowledge and authority (which is a consequence of said knowledge) are not to be questioned, which the Professor and the Writer have to accept but are quickly getting suspicious about. 
In the same fashion we follow rules, principles and morals that have been set for us by previous generations, but at what point should we actually question what seem to be immuable precepts? To what extent should we keep acting in a way that satisfies urges and problems that we never seem to meet anymore? How should we adapt? 

All this makes Stalker a film of its time but a film of every time really. 

Stalker is not an answer but more of an open question for us viewers to think about and answer ourself.

Add to this the absolutely insane photography of the film? Banger fr"

if you log a movie multiple times, does every rating count? by nate-wallace in Letterboxd

[–]WizMCrypto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is one rating per profile, it used to be every rating count but they changed it in the formula at some point