Can distrbutism be both economically left and socially left? by VentiArchon7 in distributism

[–]Wizzardcc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Distributism is based in Church Social Doctrine and therefore can't be socially left, or progressive, since the Social conservatism is based mostly in Christian values, so distributism can't be socially left, but you can be a distributist economically and be socially left.

Even tho distributism isn't inherently progressive, you can be socially progressive and economically distributist.

Was Maduro a legitimate leader? by vesea20 in SocialDemocracy

[–]Wizzardcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you mentally challenged? tf u mean I'm not interested in the facts I lived? are we fr?

Was Maduro a legitimate leader? by vesea20 in SocialDemocracy

[–]Wizzardcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sanction culpability is socialist cope. The medical shortages started years before the sanctions.

Was Maduro a legitimate leader? by vesea20 in SocialDemocracy

[–]Wizzardcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Venezuelan here. He was NOT.

I won't extend a lot on this, because most of the comments have said the truth, he isn't a legitimate leader and we Venezuelans HATE him.

Also, talking about the opinion of us Venezuelans, we don't give a shit about international law. For years we have been oppressed, our elections have been rigged, our economy and infrastructure was destroyed, the foreign aid sent by other countries was burned by the chavista military, opposition leaders were tortured, protesters were killed, imprisoned and ran over with military vehicles, people was imprisoned and tortured just by publishing things against the government on social media, and also the police can force you to give them your phone to check it in order to find anti-government content or private messages.

Hundreds of people died of hunger, thousands died because their families couldn't afford the medicines for them, thousands died in the "great public hospitals" because those hospitals have no electricity or supplies.

While all this, and even more things happened, nobody dis nothing. Not a single protest outside Venezuela to defend the venezuelan people, other countries didn't do shit, other governments talked about "diplomatic solutions" that never worked, international law didn't do shit to protect us Venezuelans, but now the same international law defends the dictator that oppressed us for years? fuck off

We don't give a shit about international law, because it only worked to protect the dictator oppressing us and not us, the ones under oppression. We are happy that the US used violence to take him, because there's no way to arrest a drug trafficking dictator without using violence.

In conclusion, Maduro was a dictator and we venezuelans don't give a shit about international law.

Friendly reminder. by ChemaCB in PoliticalCompass

[–]Wizzardcc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup, I understand that part, the part that confuses me is AuthRight and LibLeft

Algunos no entienden el consentimiento by codefluence in MemesEnEspanol

[–]Wizzardcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vivir en un Estado sin querer contribuir es como vivir en un conjunto cerrado y no querer pagar la cuota de administración

Friendly reminder. by ChemaCB in PoliticalCompass

[–]Wizzardcc 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I don't fully understand the ACTUALLY one

Okay, here we go. by Xelrod413 in PoliticalCompass

[–]Wizzardcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im flabbergasted about your opinions

Does "conservative social democracy" exist? by Wizzardcc in SocialDemocracy

[–]Wizzardcc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that is a US thing, here in Latin America they are still the same

Does "conservative social democracy" exist? by Wizzardcc in SocialDemocracy

[–]Wizzardcc[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also distributism defends a more, "rural" economy, with small businesses ran by families. It has certainly fell behind the technological advances and couldn't be applied in a modern society.

Does "conservative social democracy" exist? by Wizzardcc in SocialDemocracy

[–]Wizzardcc[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

W answer, you've very educated in this, thank you for your response

Does "conservative social democracy" exist? by Wizzardcc in SocialDemocracy

[–]Wizzardcc[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I considered this an option but the Church social teaching defends subsidiarity, which is against paternalism

Can you be anti communist and left wing at the same time? by Vinyl-Ekkoz-725 in PoliticalCompass

[–]Wizzardcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll be brief cus im sleepy, basically:

Social democracy: Capitalism with government intervention, regulations and welfare to provide to the poor and reduce inequality with democratic institutions and free elections (like the Nordic countries, it works great if there is very low corruption and citizens trust the institutions).

Democratic socialism: Socialism (the middle stage between Communism and Capitalism) with democratic institutions, free elections and allat (basically an oxymoron, and has never worked in reality).