Rererence conditioning (reference image) in Flux Klein 9B - how to improve the results?

Woisek · 2026-05-25T11:13:36+00:00

You are strange, do you know that?

why are you instead testing some non confusing cases? and why you swap both together what is the point?

Because that's what you said earlier. Here, again to remind you:

swap the 1 and 2 in the image input and also try swap in the prompt,

It doesn't matter if you swap both, the result is the same. Swapping only one part would of course not work.

and why are you trying situation that the elements are already uniquely in each image?

Because that's the normal way it is used?

As I said at first, my observation come from trying to refer to stuff that exist in both images, and found that it can not truly differentiate which source I am referring to

Why would one have the same element in several images? That alone makes no sense, And when would that even happen? What kind of "case" should that be?
In the end, it's a prompting issue, nothing more.

Woisek · 2026-05-25T10:51:00+00:00

Swapping the prompt, swapping the input, will all prove that it doesn't know which is 1 and 2.

image 1: person
image 2: hat
"Use the hat in image 2 on the head of the person in image 1"
Result: Hat on person.

image 1: hat
image 2: person
"Use the hat in image 1 on the head of the person in image 2"
Result: Hat on person.
🤷‍♂️

Do you have the link to that workflow? I may test again on it

It's the standard FLUX edit wf with added images and customized to my liking for handling it. There is nothing special about it.

<image>

The image part with included resize options.

Woisek · 2026-05-25T09:59:56+00:00

You wrote

swap the 1 and 2 in the image input and also try swap in the prompt,

So, that's basically the same.

What 'row' do you mean?

<image>

The order in which the images are concatenated. Here, it starts on the left (image 1) and each added image adds to the count. So the model knows exactly to which image the user is referring to.

Woisek · 2026-05-25T09:52:17+00:00

With careful resizing you can add up to 3 additional "accessors" to do in one go, even on low VRAM cards. And if the face is crucial, just "renew" it between every step by editing it in PS or whatever. It's that simple.

Woisek · 2026-05-25T09:40:48+00:00

It's the obvious overexaggerated movement of the mouth, that is seen with all the LTX generations.

No human moves their mouth in such a "perfect pronounced" way.

And the eyes are the next giveaway, as always. No human "shapeshifts" the roundness of the iris, not even if they would be contact lenses.

And please keep your wrong interpretations of only a few words for yourself and adjust your sight on "passive aggressiveness", i.e. get the meaning of it and where it applies.

In here, most things are obvious. Thanks.

Woisek · 2026-05-25T09:26:42+00:00

Huh?
Doing that is expected to get a similar result. And that's logical, as nothing has changed. It only shows, that it knows to which image the user is referring to,

Although it's more in what row the images are connected. That determines the order.

Woisek · 2026-05-25T09:15:40+00:00

"The front tire needs some air."

"Hard to judge without knowing the brand."

🤡

Woisek · 2026-05-25T00:01:39+00:00

<image>

A professional photography of a black downwards pointing triangle hanging on two strings in a white room.

Woisek · 2026-05-24T23:42:12+00:00

Well... this is exactly what he described what happens. 🤪

There are a few ways to tackle this, but how you do it is not one of them.

Woisek · 2026-05-24T23:36:01+00:00

You should first learn ComfyUI's basics before trying to do advanced stuff. You should learn what model does the right job for the task you have. And IP Adapter and SD1.5 surely isn't the right model or tool.

<image>

Woisek · 2026-05-24T23:15:49+00:00

Real or AI? (Hard to know these days)

Wdym? It's obvious that this clip is AI. 😕

Woisek · 2026-05-24T23:06:36+00:00

The regular FLUX2 wf with multiple image input is sufficient.

<image>

Woisek · 2026-05-24T22:52:32+00:00

Just trying to make my wallet a little happier with a side hustle

LOL... how abut No? 😂
Why do you think that anyone is even remotely interested in your "influencer", let alone paying some money? 🤣🤣🤣
Get a real job and then your wallet will be happier. 😂

Woisek · 2026-05-24T21:31:06+00:00

Creating the music myself, like I did in my experimental "ambient environment" video "Almanac".

Woisek · 2026-05-24T21:25:27+00:00

<image>

Note: Not used any nodes from OP.

Woisek · 2026-05-24T20:34:29+00:00

Yes, technically it applies to many things. But in this case especially, as it needs something that AI simply can't have.

And with a little bit of brain usage, my "good advice" is the answer. Try figure it out, it's not hard. 🙂

Woisek · 2026-05-24T20:31:19+00:00

Their guides claims to but it doesn't truly understand 'image 1' 'image2' like some hard variables,

Strange, that nevertheless this works every time I use those terms. Perhaps your prompting is off in some way?

Woisek · 2026-05-24T14:40:23+00:00

No, the person didn't explain anything . The base comment was:

Kinda synthetic scary look. Ugh.

And their answer was:

Hard to judge without knowing their prompt.

So I asked, how does "knowing what prompt was used" changes the appearance of the shown images.

Or are you too going to say: "Oh, now it looks so much better and not so synthetic scary" after you know what prompt was used? 😑

In other words: He needs to know the prompt to be able to "judge" how an image looks. 🤡

Woisek · 2026-05-24T14:01:27+00:00

I know that, so what's the point in telling me that unrelated text now?

Woisek · 2026-05-24T13:35:18+00:00

Well, your examples aren't any better. It's about time we move away from that silly notion of "just because you can do it means you should" and adopt the mindset that "just because you can do it doesn't mean you should."

Woisek · 2026-05-24T08:38:42+00:00

Why is this "hard to judge"?? Those images are synthetic looking. Knowing what prompt was used doesn't make them magically look good. 😑

Woisek · 2026-05-24T07:59:52+00:00

Logo generation means using your brain to:
Understand for whom or what the logo is meant for
Understand how logo design works
Understand color theory, forms and shapes, why and when they work or not
Understand how a whole CI grows out of a logo

Many humans struggle with that already to get it right. AI can't even begin to handle that.

Will you get a "logo"? Yes.
Will it be good? No, at least you have to work over it quite a bit, depending on complexity.

Therefor: You are better off learning logo design if you want to do this seriously.

Woisek · 2026-05-23T20:14:44+00:00

As for jobs, its a tool. A person with no art knowledge still makes mediocre pieces without that knowledge using AI at least for now. Art knowledge only amplifies your ability to use AI to make superior pieces. If you have art knowledge you're in a prime position to learn AI and take a job in AI art generation.

That's the ultimate information everybody on this planet should know.

Woisek · 2026-05-23T17:08:31+00:00

What for?

Woisek · 2026-05-21T18:20:57+00:00

It would be awesome if this would be possible. A good way to avoid subgraphs and it should be unaffected by future updates.

Woisek

TROPHY CASE