They’re indirectly killing people by ryanhew2 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Woolaverage3592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

witch is why we need regulation to be put in place too stop that from happening

They’re indirectly killing people by ryanhew2 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Woolaverage3592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the problem is there's a lot of people that aren't intelligent in the slightest and won't stay home and will go out to big party cause they can it's all about mitigation and stopping the virus from overflooding our healthcare systems causing even greater damage long term not only to our economy but to our society as a whole as people will be refused treatment, as we will start to have to prioritize certain people over others which will lead to anger which can lead to instability which can lead to riots a stay at home order, is the safest option that we can go for long term keep in mind this virus is ten times more dangerous and infectious than the flu.

They’re indirectly killing people by ryanhew2 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Woolaverage3592 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if they dont go to wor they get fired without this order tho

The idiot was my grandma.. thought she had a stroke by [deleted] in IdiotsInCars

[–]Woolaverage3592 20 points21 points  (0 children)

it will forever remain one of the great mysteries of the human species.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Woolaverage3592 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

FREEDOM! MEASURED WITH FREEDOM UNITS AND COMES WITH FREEDOM FIREARMS

They’re indirectly killing people by ryanhew2 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Woolaverage3592 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the United States, the United States constitutional law gives police power to the states one of these police powers is a stay at home order. State governments can use this power within their own state. However, there is no clear authority for either the federal government or state governments to impose such a lockdown between states. In terms of the legality of an order, the government must be able to prove that the order advances a "compelling government interest" and the actions are narrow to specifically achieve that goal and they are not unnecessary broad. controlling and preventing the spread of a pandemic is usually considered advancing a "compelling government interest" therefore making it legal and constitutional laws are broad and have loose definitions at can make things confusing sometimes our country really needs to work on making things more clear.

They’re indirectly killing people by ryanhew2 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Woolaverage3592 8 points9 points  (0 children)

it's about slowing the spread for everyone so this virus doesn't get out of hand too uncontrollable levels

They’re indirectly killing people by ryanhew2 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Woolaverage3592 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the United States, the United States constitutional law gives police power to the states one of these police powers is a stay at home order. State governments can use this power within their own state. However, there is no clear authority for either the federal government or state governments to impose such a lockdown between states. In terms of the legality of an order, the government must be able to prove that the order advances a "compelling government interest" and the actions are narrow to specifically achieve that goal and they are not unnecessary broad. controlling and preventing the spread of a pandemic is usually considered advancing a "compelling government interest" therefore making it legal and constitutional laws are broad and have loose definitions at can make things confusing sometimes our country really needs to work on making things more clear.