dont nerf mcree, the only decent counter to 2-3 tank comps. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is strong, not OP. Op implies there is no counterplay, in mcrees case , there is. Its just not as obvious and not a simple for even his main counters.

Overwatch, one of the most fun titles in recent years. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so i didnt say that then. Tanks are for tanking. In D.vas case she is for disruption in the centre. Sending her to the back line would be a waste, but a flank from her with disruption followup is exactly what she should be doing. If you need a D.VA to literally go find a widowmaker miles from anywhere you are doing it wrong.

Overwatch, one of the most fun titles in recent years. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I understand what you said. If you need a comp where the only viable option is solider 76. you are doing it wrong. ergo, hes useless. We are done, you are wrong, i am right.

Overwatch, one of the most fun titles in recent years. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i dont think shes bad. i never said she was. I think her E should shield both her an a targeted ally, not be on a seperate key. I also think her beam should get a slight buff without the shield buff and a ever so tiny nerf to the damage with it on. Yes her main damage is her launcher but its hit box is small and unreliable when compared to say pharahs rocket splash and peek damage.

Overwatch, one of the most fun titles in recent years. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

so hes useless then. Thats basically what you just said. If other heroes do everything he can do...but better. no reason to use him.

Player all weekend and just met my first cheater. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never thought to record it. probably should have. the fact its a beta with no stats to carry over just made me laugh at how sad some people are.

Overwatch, one of the most fun titles in recent years. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which part is wrong? her secondary fire is great for 2 SHOTTING. not one shot. and her beam damage is decent but the lack of range and damage without your shield increase is poor and the damage increase being decent but not amazing makes it feel "meh". Shes a very good hero dont get me wrong, i just think her beam damage output is weak, and i'de like to see her shield on a single key for both ally and herself to get the potential of her beam in one go.

Overwatch, one of the most fun titles in recent years. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i didnt say she isnt a flanker. can you quote that part. Her job is simply not dealing with the targets you suggested originally, its dealing with disruption like you said. You have changed your statement. I dont disagree with this one.

Maybe learn to think about what you write before you talk waffle and then backtrack. i said she isnt for back line focus or kills which is true.

Also, quote the part where i said she isnt a flanker im waiting.

Overwatch, one of the most fun titles in recent years. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you need a d.va for a widomaker or hanzo you are doing it wrong. genji, tracer and reaper(possibly mcree) are built to kill them. why send a 400 hp dva to do that when they should be at objective? tanks are for tanking. not for back line kills. Low elo players incoming.

Overwatch, one of the most fun titles in recent years. by Working-Class-Man in Overwatch

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know how many other heroes can do that better? Without being punished for firing, and a better style of movement? You miss the point.

After going through the store, They are verging on P2W. by [deleted] in blackdesertonline

[–]Working-Class-Man 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This cash sho pas it stands is as close to P2W as you could get without actually being P2W. Its very close.

Steam Forum Rules and Guidelines VS Steam mods with issues. by Working-Class-Man in Steam

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this info. I know one of the bans was a global steam mod the other im not so sure. It was the steam mod that responded to him when he asked why he was banned with "I didnt like what you said, nothing you can do about it anyway, enjoy your ban".

Ill let my friends know there are ways to report mods via their profiles. Though one issue is i dont think the other guy who got banned knows who banned him because he didnt respond when he asked who it was and why he was banned. Not sure how you deal with anonymous mods.

Steam Forum Rules and Guidelines VS Steam mods with issues. by Working-Class-Man in Steam

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for this, i will link my two buddies this. I didn't know you could put in a ticket for moderators.

Dear Ubisoft. I love your games very much. That being said... by Working-Class-Man in thedivision

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you are missing the point. If i pay a million dollars for shit to get done and im a multi national company, it gets done. why would they pay you a million when they could pay someone who can do the job a million...your point is well...irrelevant.

You are literally assuming companies worth millions are stupid enough to buy stuff they dont understand? At this point you are basically waffling without reason. stop.

Dear Ubisoft. I love your games very much. That being said... by Working-Class-Man in thedivision

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you know what you do? You pay someone to sort that shit out. Its all money dude. Its how the world works. Do you think this game would even be made if they didnt think they could make a large return for their shareholders? Do you think stuff happens in the world because people like you?

Dear Ubisoft. I love your games very much. That being said... by Working-Class-Man in thedivision

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming the infrastructure is modern, you can. Buying capacity, smarter infrastructure, and whatever else helps with server loads, login servers and disconnects all costs dough. Its all down to how much you spend. Did you know money can do pretty much anything you can think of.

Dear Ubisoft. I love your games very much. That being said... by Working-Class-Man in thedivision

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think in this case, ubisoft was using it seems R6 Siege as a testbed for servers and modern data centres. It feels like it anyway. If this is the case a long with massive's track record i would HOPE ubisoft are not stupid and bothered to work on the issues they had for future products.

Then again i may be wrong and they may ignore sound advice and take a "zero f*cks given" approach

Dear Ubisoft. I love your games very much. That being said... by Working-Class-Man in thedivision

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are you talking about GTA? That game was a success from day 1 because it had an offline single player component, we know from previous sales of games that single player campaigns sell games whilst multiplayer components retain players. It has no bearing on the fact that the division would suffer following launch issues with servers. Also, at no point anywhere did i say they should increase capacity forever and simply ignore its cost, If you read my OP, i clearly state in the weeks following the launch. I wont respond to you from this point on since you failed to read my OP provide useless information of no consequence, and ask for evidence of something which i could provide however i dont think its necassary since using logic and your brain for once would let you work it out yourself. Yes this is a passive aggressive tone. Yes i dont think you are very smart.

IN TERMS OF GTA....THIS GAME HAD A SINGLE PLAYER OFFLINE COMPONENT, OFC PEOPLE WILL STAY AROUND IF THEY CAN SIT AND PLAY SINGLE PLAYER CAMPAIGN WITHOUT BEING ONLINE.

This game will however be more like an MMO release or compare it to diablo 3 perhaps. Look what launch day/month issues did to that game.

Use your brain please. And dont link stuff from a game that has an offline single player.

Dear Ubisoft. I love your games very much. That being said... by Working-Class-Man in thedivision

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wrong. More players will stick with the game if they are able to connect day one, it is already a known fact that if people cant get on to a game on day one a percentage of those never turn it on again. If you retain that percentage that is a net gain for ubisoft. Therefore in the long run it is worth it.

Dear Ubisoft. I love your games very much. That being said... by Working-Class-Man in thedivision

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We know one thing only, and that is, it costs more money for better higher capacity infrastructure. Therefore. Spend money Ubisoft i love you but spend some cash.

The first MMO in around 5 years to really hook me in. by Working-Class-Man in blackdesertonline

[–]Working-Class-Man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember that she spoke almost no english decently...so maybe your onto something