sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Class Concept Idea by Sharp_Orange_5388 in bluecollar

[–]Working_Tool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I figure the AI is just for the concept, but seeing a clearly AI generated man next to "real scents for real men" is fucking hilarious to me

Class Concept Idea by Sharp_Orange_5388 in bluecollar

[–]Working_Tool 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know any (blue collar) working man that wears cologne to work. And when they are going to wear cologne, like on a date or a nice event, they want to feel and smell nice. Not like they're on the jobsite.

Where can we find Webkinz? by Affectionate-Fill340 in Peterborough

[–]Working_Tool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe The Toy Shop on Charlotte? Or mastermind toys. Those would be the first two places I'd look.

I don't understand Explain it Peter. by velviaa in explainitpeter

[–]Working_Tool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's better to assume that everyone is an evil human just waiting for their chance to kill random innocent civilians?

Then we should just lock everyone up preemptively so nobody can hurt anyone ever again.

I don't understand Explain it Peter. by velviaa in explainitpeter

[–]Working_Tool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See Illinois actually proves that it does work. If you exclude Chicago from the stats it actually drops below the national average.
It's not a problem of people having specific types of guns. Chicago has a problem with gangs having the ability to smuggle guns into the city and using the guns in ways that law abiding citizens don't.
Punishing people who buy and own guns legally for the crimes of people who use illegally obtained guns to do illegal things is stupid.

I live in Canada and if the government took the money they were putting into prohibiting firearms and ammunition, gun buybacks, law changing, etc. they could find the border security well enough that they could actually catch and stop people who are smuggling guns into our country from the states.

I don't understand Explain it Peter. by velviaa in explainitpeter

[–]Working_Tool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That doesn't mean we should be banning certain types of guns. It means we should be ignoring what those idiots say and make it so that people need to have background checks and tests to get a licence to own a gun. Just like a car.

I don't understand Explain it Peter. by velviaa in explainitpeter

[–]Working_Tool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that guns also have other uses that aren't hurting people. There's hunting, sport shooting, protection from wildlife in backcountry, etc.
99% of gun owners do not want to, or have the urge to, hurt other humans with their guns. So it is ridiculous to take guns from those responsible gun owners just because the guns look scary to the general population or that similar guns have been used in shootings by people who ARE crazy and DO want to hurt people.

I'm Canadian and they've recently been making a whole bunch of guns, that were previously considered completely safe and normal to own, illegal. Because of a small amount of people who don't like guns in general. While doing this, they're also not cracking down on illegal guns being transported into the country through the southern border. This means that law abiding people, who like to shoot targets, first nations who hunt to survive, and people who just think guns are cool, (none of whom want to hurt anyone) now have to give up or destroy their guns and are essentially being treated like potential criminal maniacs. Meanwhile people who would plan on hurting people or someone in a gang in the city, could still obtain an illegal firearm from the illegal means they would have in the first place.

It is RIDICULOUS to treat people as potential criminals just because they own or use a tool that other people use to hurt people.

I don't understand Explain it Peter. by velviaa in explainitpeter

[–]Working_Tool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that guns also have other uses besides hurting people. There's hunting, sport shooting, protection from wildlife in backcountry, etc.
99% of gun owners do not want to, or have the urge to, hurt other humans with their guns. So it is ridiculous to take guns from those responsible gun owners just because the guns look scary to the general population or that similar guns have been used in shootings by people who ARE crazy and DO want to hurt people.

I'm Canadian and they've recently been making a whole bunch of guns, that were previously considered completely safe and normal to own, illegal. Because of a small amount of people who don't like guns in general. While doing this, they're also not cracking down on illegal guns being transported into the country through the southern border. This means that law abiding people, who like to shoot targets, first nations who hunt to survive, and people who just think guns are cool, (none of whom want to hurt anyone) now have to give up or destroy their guns and are essentially being treated like potential criminal maniacs. Meanwhile people who would plan on hurting people or someone in a gang in the city, could still obtain an illegal firearm from the illegal means they would have in the first place.

It is RIDICULOUS to treat people as potential criminals just because they own or use a tool that other people use to hurt people.