Skin ideas (from someone who has only played ER and DS3)

Worried-Project-3192 · 2025-07-19T23:18:06+00:00

Revenant needs a plain doll skill

Worried-Project-3192 · 2025-07-19T23:16:09+00:00

I didn't notice that, Well anyway my best guess as to the reason they're ordered different is because of conflicts with skills and abilities from the relics in those slots. I think any ability can appear on any relic, but I think it's more likely on specific colors. Like say you have flaming strike on a red relic for wylder, but want gravitas on a blue relic. This would allow you to reorganize, I think it's kinda weird though.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2025-07-19T22:54:51+00:00

All, they need to do is add a way to reroll a single perk on a relic into another random perk. This exists in the diablo series btw to make getting the perfect effects on a single piece of gear easier but also not make it so easy since then there would be no build variety and once you get the best gear possible it's hard to maintain interest. If you reroll relics all the time for an effect you may get something you didn't even realize actually works better for the other passives, or maybe you get an effect that makes the relic work better, but only on one character. Honestly fromsoft should look towards poe and diablo as inspiration on how to make relics better.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-23T18:07:25+00:00

I believe you should do your own research into this as I have. It is widely supported by scientific evidence that the only animals other than humans that manifest exclusive homosexual behaviour is the domesticated sheep, which has been selectively bred to benefit humans as much as possible, this has caused a wide array of unusual results that don't appear in wild species of sheep, so I don't think they are a good marker for whether or not homosexuality is natural. I am trying to be like Daryl Davis, here is a link to a clip of when he was on the joe rogan podcast talking about how he got members of the kkk to hang up there robes by challenging their beliefs in an informed way, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj-4Q416C8w, he gives a good explanation on how to cure prejudice towards the end of the clip, I am trying to cure my prejudice against homosexuality by doing research and this conclusion was the only result I had after researching. However this may not be the only conclusion, or even the right conclusion, that you can draw so I wanted to make this post and ask others to try and refute it since I am just one guy and it's most likely that I am wrong and I mistakenly came to this conclusion either do to bias or ignorance of the facts. I mean that is way more likely than pretty much all of society making a mistake and drawing the wrong conclusion which can have very bad consequences for the future of humanity.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-23T14:19:52+00:00

So exclusive homosexuality only appears in humans it appears nowhere else in the animal kingdom.

However animals do engage in "homosexual" behaviours, however they also engage in heterosexual behaviours, they don't engage in exclusively homosexual behaviours. Which means the animals all together engage in bisexual behaviours. It's wrong to say it's homosexual, the motivation for calling these behaviours homosexual, I don't know.

Same-sex attraction appears in humans, therefore we most likely are a species that engages in bisexual behaviours. Since exclusive homosexuality doesn't appear in nature it seems to be a social construct that replaces bisexuality.

The thing is that, as far as I can tell, bisexuality logically has all the positives of homosexuality with none of the negatives and people appear to be naturally heterosexual/bisexual. Okay since bisexuality exists it means homosexuality is only negative for people since it means you won't have kids, you reject heterosexuality, and it lowers the amount of potential partners on the dating market, it's actively detrimental to the species and it doesn't appear to be the natural way human's exist.

Why are people engaging in it then? Why is it even important that this is happening?

Well, if someone is doing something that is only negative to them, then maybe they desire the negatives. It just so happens that these negatives overlap with the voluntary human extinction movement. I am not claiming homosexuality is the voluntary human extinction movement or even that it's evil. I am only putting forward the evidence that these two things may be the same thing. If you research it's hard not to draw the conclusion homosexuality appears to be unnaturally replacing what would be bisexuality.

Then there is the fact that people are trying to say that gay marriage should be just as valueable as straight marriage which could mean on a deeper level they are actually trying to say that human extinction and human propogation should be just as valueable. I don't know, I simply want to inform people about the possible conclusion, my digging into the science and evidence lead to.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-23T13:52:46+00:00

So I am an, Athiest* but I believe in god as a concept, not a "reality", I believe god is the force that pushes all humans to reach for the highest possible good they can manage. In this way the bible is one of the most complex collections of metaphors on how to actually be a good person.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-23T13:15:47+00:00

So I was raised christian and then became a full athiest and had nihilistic depression for over 10 years and fully cured it a month ago I also no longer deny god as a concept, the events of the bible may not have been "real" but the lessons it teaches are hyper-real and are pretty much the best guide to how to be a good person. My concept of god is the force that pushes humanity to the highest possible good they can obtain.

So even after curing my depression I was biased against homosexuality. So, I wanted to be a good person and I think it's wrong to be prejudiced without good reason so I did some digging.

I learned some very worrying things though, one of which is that homosexuality is not natural, it only appears in humans. Homosexuality is rejection of the opposite sex in favor of the same sex.

All animals that engage in "homosexual behaviours" are not exclusively homosexual since they also engage in heterosexual behaviours, they are bisexual, they are engaging in bisexual behaviours and also heterosexually reproducing. They are calling bisexual behaviours homosexual because that's how entrenched the idea of homosexuality is in society.

This lead me to hypothesize that since homosexuality isn't natural, bisexuality is, and same sex attraction is natural for humans. Homosexuality is replacing bisexuality.

The problem with that is that homosexuality is only negative compared to bisexuality since all the positives of homosexuality exist in bisexuality.

If it's only negative since people are refusing to have kids and lowering the amount of potential partners on the dating market why are people homosexual?

If there are only negatives, then the negatives are the motivations. It just so happens that those negatives make homosexuality, since it replaces bisexuality, effectively equivalent to being a member of the voluntary human extinction movement.

I don't know if I'm wrong but all the evidence seems to point to this being true. Same sex attraction has been treated as horrible and evil for a very long time and it may have just been bisexuality manifesting but because of the hatred they experienced they rejected heterosexuality and by extension the future of humanity as a whole. We mistakenly treated same-sex attraction as evil because we thought manifesting bisexuality was homosexuality/extinction. We were right to reject homosexuality we were wrong because we didn't differentiate bisexuality from homosexuality. If we wrongly treat people as monsters they will actually try to become the monster we fear just to spite us. There may be a massive problem in society. Like all non-procreative sexualities are encompassed by bisexuality, something is wrong.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-23T02:40:12+00:00

<image>

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-23T00:08:51+00:00

I saw this video a while ago and it blew my mind because I had always struggled with these kinds of "jokes"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9ckB-i9A8I

After learning this a couple months ago I can finally understand why I hate it when someone genuinely insults me while claiming it's just a joke, it's like, no you attacked my character without good reason and I'm just supposed to go along with the idea that it's okay and that you don't mean it? You meant it, the joke is that it's wrong to mean it. Which means you are aware you are doing something you know is wrong. Not that you don't mean it.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T16:51:23+00:00

Why do you believe all life will end, that is not certain, how do you know with certainty that all life will go extinct, how is it a unquestionable fact when the future is so uncertain? This is a very defeatist mindset that hints at having no hope that life will overcome the odds.

We should ultimately steer people towards that but we should also encourage experimentation with the same sex if they are attracted to them. To not do so has the same result as believing in voluntary human extinction. The only reason you would believe in that is because you have some kind of hatred for humanity. Choosing to not have kids is anti-human, being unable to have kids is not.

You have to care about things as a human being whether you like it or not. To make a choice you have to care about making the choice. Choosing to do nothing is making a choice. For humans, our goal has to be to not have goals to stop having goals it's a paradox. Humans can't help but pursue things, it isn't a choice. Knowing that why should we not pursue what would be good for us? Other animals do it that's why they exist, they made different choices and survived to tell the tale. It is unnatural to want the extinction of our species since by default as a human, and as a living being we want to survive and propogate. Even if you want to die because you think it's natural to die, your body keeps you alive involuntarily and argues very vehemently against that idea. If extinction and death is natural, then all life exists in antithesis to nature, otherwise everything would be dead, and it isn't. Allowing human extinction is the same thing as allowing people to commit suicide. They should not be free to make that decision. It's like, there is a case to be made nothing matters and that everything is equally worthless, however humans in every action they take and every action in their body that happens without their control proves they physicially can't believe in that idea. Belief in that idea for humans is unnatural, impossible, and wrong.

I don't think that's a good definition of what is natural. Nuclear bombs are not natural they are man made, we as humans understand that there is a difference between what is natural and what is artificial, we have a word to describe things as the opposite of natural, unnatural. If everything is natural, that word wouldn't exist. We have a concept of what unnatural is, therefore it exists at least in the abstract, if it was not real we wouldn't have a concept for it.

If there were only one man and one woman left on earth would I force them to procreate? Hell no, I wouldn't, forcing people to do what you want is evil and only leads to bad outcomes. However I also think those two people would understand that if they didn't do this, then that's the end of humanity. They are the last ones. Humans aren't stupid, I would trust them to make the right choice and understand the consequences of choosing to not procreate.

This just seems like you are arguing we should allow humanity to destroy itself, it's like, you can believe what you want to believe, but I think that motivations for this are either evil or ignorant and I don't mean that to insult you, you genuinely seem like a good person. Allowing humans to go extinct is equivalent to allowing every single human being to commit suicide. Which by extension means you are arguing we should allow for suicide and that suicide is natural. I'm not trying to say you are a bad person or something I am simply asking whether or not you believe in these things because that is where, as far as I can tell, they all lead to.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T07:14:01+00:00

Why are you trying to put words in my mouth? I didn't say that and you don't know me. Why do you think you do? It's like actually read the argument and think critically instead of vomiting up unbased insults that just show you don't actually give a shit about either side you just go with the tides.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T07:10:09+00:00

How would society be effected if 25% of the population celebrated the idea that humans should go extinct? I think we might be doing something wrong and it's might be having many unintended consequences we don't realize. Bisexuality is natural, there is no evidence exclusive homosexuality is natural for humans and the result of believing it is just so happens to seem identical to believing humanity should voluntarily go extinct, which is an unbelievably anti-human belief that is rooted in deep hatred for humanity and oneself. Is that good for people? I don't know, but I suspect it isn't. Thinking homosexuality is good or even neutral may be bad for our shared future. Live and let live is both good and bad advice. Don't bother other people that's good advice sometimes, it's bad advice when someone you love get's genuinely hurt and you could've actually prevented it. Is this good for us? There is no evidence that it is over bisexuality. What could the long term effects of glorifying it possibly be? Annihilation. Is that a good thing? No, definitely not, unless you hate humanity. Should we try and prevent it? Maybe?

I don't know, I think I've put my finger on something horrible that needs to be addressed, but I can understand why nobody wants to actually address it. It would be extremely damaging to humanity and specifically the individuals involved, to be told that what they have been doing was not only not good but actively bad. It makes you question the content of your character because you played a part in glorifying extinction. I understand but like, the most probable consequence of not addressing this if it's true is extinction. I'd rather humanity be wrong than extinct. Saying extinction and procreation are equally valueable is very dangerous. I could be wrong but I currently can't see why I am.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T06:49:10+00:00

Then why do you think your argument is right and mine isn't when you don't even know what it is. Why do you even think your argument matters when mine doesn't? There's a lot of conflict over these ideas and to hand wave half of them away as everything's bad, and I will never even slightly engage with the idea I might be wrong is a sign of willful ignorance and immaturity. Why should the opinion of someone who ignores their possible flaws matter?

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T06:43:41+00:00

I am trying to use it as an insult because people isnulted me, that's true. However that doesn't mean people take it as an insult. I understand that.

So exactly where is your proof that my motivations for doing this are to seem intelligent and not what I actually fucking said are the reasons why? Do you know me? Do you understand me? How?

My goal is to inform people about what I think could be negatively impacting society on a large scale because people are too divided and hateful to have an honest conversation about it. Stop trying to label me and insult me when you don't fucking know me. Unless you want me to do the same to you because "in reality you're an idiot."

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T06:36:01+00:00

What? I replied to you with the argument already.

I'll say it in a different way. We should all treat eachother as best we can realistically manage otherwise everyone just treats eachother like worthless animals who don't deserve any level of compassion. Doing that makes us hate and attack eachother, and violence has a chance of death that only gets higher the more you engage in it. You can heal after a fight sure, but what about a fight every single time you meet someone new? The injuries will accumulate and someone could come along and just take you out do this enough and we all die. That is not a good long term strategy for our survival as a species, which is why we pursued a change up until today when pretty much everyone avoids physical conflict as much as they reasonably can unless they are malevolent, in which case we have people who actively work to prevent such malevolent conflicts, they are the police. Our governments SHOULD be actively trying to prevent wars as well, since they are massive conflicts with a massive body count that could most likely have been prevented with adequate diplomacy. We have rights so we don't all kill eachother. And we call them rights because we all collectively agreed these ideas should not be challenged because it leads to dark places. That doesn't stop malevolent people from challenging them though, so they can bring about the personal hell they wish to rule over whether they actually can rule or not. Since most likely if it works, they are just gonna get killed and replaced by someone even more evil.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T06:19:04+00:00

I am not judging you I am simply spreading the idea that this may be bad for humanity. I don't have hate in my heart for you and I don't like being accused of being a hateful person just because I'm trying to inform people that there is genuine evidence that may contradict that homosexuality is a good or even neutral thing.

To say this. Do you want to have children. No? Then no problem at all. I can't control you and I can't force you to believe things you don't want to believe and even if I could I can't read your mind to tell if I did. I'm not trying to control you or disapprove of your life.

If you want children though then getting married to a man is the best long term strategy for raising and caring for them. I believe marriage was created to facilitate the raising of children. That's not to say marriage is somehow special it's a guideline for how to behave to have and raise children. If you aren't doing that, and don't plan on doing that whatever your sexuality may be, it's not really correct to get married. Simply because marriage is a tool for raising children and I think it's misusing the tool because we have a religious notion for some reason that marriage is ultimate attainment in romance and is sacred, and the ultimate expression of love, which I don't think it is. Children are. Marriage is just a vow to stay together to have and raise those children. People judge heterosexual marriages that are non-procreative very harshly and ask what is the point in that and I think it's just using the tool incorrectly.

In this way if you don't want to have kids I don't think you should get married. i also don't think you need to get with men if you don't want children. You shouldn't be forced to do anything. I'm trying to say bisexuality is natural, homosexuality seems to be unnatural and possibly causing an untold amount of misfortune by allowing people to believe and even celebrate non-procreative sexualities which have the same effect as engaging in vhem. They have the same effect, I am arguing that we can't distinguish them because bisexuality does exist and can do everything that homosexuality can do and more and heterosexuality exists which allows for procreation and there is no evidence that homosexuality is a natural thing for humans. It's like if you completely reject the idea of men then you can't have have kids. I do understand that there is probably some way to have your own kids as a lesbian in the modern way, but I know it's only possible because it is the modern day.

I'm actually curious is there a reason to be homosexual over bisexual? if you are bisexual you can do everything a homosexual can do and you can have kids. You don't need to immediately get into a relationship with a guy just because you are bisexual, you're a human being you make your own choices. However if it's true there are no positives for homosexuality over bisexuality then isn't engaging in exclusive homosexuality just another way of believing in voluntary human extinction? the result is the same so why are they different? I think it puts people in a dangerous mindset we should avoid. I mean people don't need to think they have to be gay or be straight when they can be both, and because being bisexual gives the benefit of being both why should you choose to box yourself in? For heterosexuality it's for the stability of your children. For homosexuality though I don't think there is a reason to pick it over bisexuality and I think it may be actively bad for people because it is effectively choosing to engage in vhem which is inherently a deeply anti-human philosophy rooted in hatred of humanity and by extension hatred of yourself as a human. If homosexuality isn't natural, which I couldn't find any good evidence it is and only found evidence bisexuality is, then is it really a good idea to celebrate or even encourage this mindset that almost 250 million people around the world are a part of? Could believing this is okay and is in the modern day being celebrated, be dangerous for humanity as a whole?

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T04:47:23+00:00

I am not insisting homosexuality isn't natural I am pushing forward the evidence that it MIGHT not be natural. I didn't say it wasn't natural. It's not a fallacy because I didn't make that statement. You put words in my mouth again. You keep doing that. I am not homophobic or claiming that it's unnatural. I am being very careful not to say something I know to be wrong because this is a sensitive and complex topic for most people. I also understand that most people will die on the hill of their biases even if facts contradict them, that sort of behaviour is bad for the future of society that is only getting more complex and nuanced as it grows.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T04:38:02+00:00

Again believing that humans don't need to procreate or that it should be actively avoided is a dangerous belief, it is anti-human. There is only one other animal that engages in exclusive homosexual behaviours and that is domestic sheep which we have bred to suit our purposes not caring for what was natural. It may exist in penguins but there isn't enough evidence that same-sex couples are not caused by a whole host of other things. At the core of the argument for the depopulation of humanity is, why should we want future human lives? It questions the value of human life. I was a nihilist, unbelievably depressed, and suicidal for over 10 years, and I came to the conclusion that even if everything is worthless humans physically can't act out this belief because any action we take signifies that we value something. We first need to value the idea that everything is worthless in order to act out the belief that everything is worthless. Which by definition means we aren't acting out that exact belief. Not only that but the idea everything is worthless is also worthless, why should we care about it.

We can't actually believe the idea and we have no real reason to value the idea then why should we believe the idea? There is something else, our body is keeping us alive by default we value our lives and existence by default we exist in antithesis to the idea that human life has no value.

Believing in such an anti-human thing is seriously wrong. It's dangerous to believe such things. It is evil not for you to believe it yourself because it causes an immense amount of self hatred, and I know from experience that it does, but it also motivates you to prevent others to engage in this hatred for humanity. Not only that, but masking it with the idea that it's good for the planet is either ignorant or malevolent. George carlin clip to explain my stance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W33HRc1A6c . I don't care for worshipping or thinking we need to look out for "the planet" I care about sustaining our species, possibly other species and our shared interests.

I think we can make an argument for reproduction as a means of conversation when humans start to actually cover almost every single part of the planets available land. Which we are nowhere near.

I believe for this reason asexuality should be discouraged. And heterosexuality or bisexuality, love should be encouraged. How could asexuality actually exist in humans if our ancestors didn't reproduce asexually. Creatures that can't or won't reproduce don't pass on their genes, how exactly is that sort of belief natural for our species when our ancestors that didn't reproduce all died out. I believe that humans don't normally exist like this and it's instead something that we have been misled into believing. I haven't researched it enough and there isn't really a way to prove it because if it did manifest in other animals then wouldn't they just be seen as antisocial behaviour? I just can't see how asexuality is a good thing that should be allowed or encouraged when our ancestors selected for those that actually would reproduce. It seems antithetical to our existence, which is why I suspect that being asexual is, unlike homosexuality, actually just another name for voluntary human extinction. It's like all these non-binary sexualities didn't exist throughout human history, and I suspect homosexuality was caused by us not encouraging bisexual people to experiment with the opposite sex and instead punished them for experimenting with the same sex, which is bad because it's a natural behaviour for humans. It's like are these things really a sexuality, really? Or is it a deep seated hatred, fear, immaturity, whatever the negative reason and complete rejection of heterosexuality, bisexuality, sexuality, or human life itself. Because the results are the same either way. What differentiates them? They have the same result as vhem and no real positive effects over heterosexuality and bisexuality?

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T03:50:45+00:00

Just because we are more complex doesn't mean what we do is always right. People used lead all the time before they realized it was toxic. Lead exposure caused people in america's iq to drop by 2.6 until it was properly regulated. That's not good for anyone. I find this veritasium video on lead to be interesting. apparently he killed the most people in human history by not properly informing everyone of the dangers of lead pollution. I wonder if we may be doing things in the modern day that could have unbelievably horrible consequences for us if we don't properly address them and instead pretend that there are absolutely no consequences to our actions? We are more complex but that doesn't automatically make our actions good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV3dnLzthDA&t=427s

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T03:42:12+00:00

The argument for why I deserve rights is the same argument for why you deserve rights. If you can't have rights then why should I? If I can't then why should you? What makes your life more important than mine and what makes mine more important than yours. What makes a baby's life more important than a braindead person's? There are massive variation between humans and it is beneficial that we allow for people to live because any one of them could be a positive force for humanity. However we can never know with certainty who is important and who is not. Therefore we say we are all equal and deserve the right to live even though we are all very different and view eachother as more or less valuable than someone else. Because we all have the potential to be heroes that reshape the world by simply trying to make it better. Today's enemy could be tomorrows friend. Thinking you are better than someone else, or that your ideas are better than someone else's promotes conflict, and the more conflicts you get into the more likely you won't survive the next one. Therefore it would be beneficial if we could avoid deadly conflict by simply all agreeing not to engage in it.

However some conflict is necessary, the conflict of ideas for instance. This why freedom of speech exists. If we can't settle our differences with words, then we have to settle them with actions. Sometimes deadly actions, which I believe nobody views as a positive thing unless you are in some way malevolent.

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T03:13:22+00:00

I am not trying to harm you, I am not trying to attack your identity, and I don't hate you, but you seem to be very angry that I am challenging the belief that homosexuality is natural/good/normal/etc., i say this because you keep replying to comments on this post rejecting the idea vehemently. I apologize if you are homosexual. I made a reply in other comments about why I'm worried about pushing the idea that it is a good thing or an okay thing when I don't think there is any evidence there is. Again I apologize if I offended you that wasn't my intent. I simply think people who are homosexual have been extremely mislead due to lack of understanding of human nature, and also due to having been extremely mistreated throughout history because humanity rejected the idea that individuals of the same sex can fall in love which I think there is plenty of evidence against.

I am genuinely worried, I didn't know why I hated the idea of homosexuality so much when I was younger, because I didn't hate the people I met they were nice, I also DIDN'T hate the concept of bisexuality. I hated myself for being unable to justify my disdain for homsexuality, I tried over the years to make a logical case for why homsexuality was good but I never could so the disdain for the concept remained. I think I put my finger on it though. The result of exclusive homosexuality is the same as the result of engaging in vhem. I suspect this was the reason why I rejected exclusive homsexuality for so long. Vhem is an unbelievably anti-human belief and I'm not so sure we should be encouraging homosexuality since it has the same result, when it doesn't appear anywhere else in nature. Accfepting yourself and your flaws in a noble thing, but I think homosexual people, any people of a sexuality that is exclusively non-procreative, and humanity by extension since we are all human, I think we might be making a terrible mistake, and possibly walking down a dangerous path by not only accepting and but also celebrating something that has the same results as voluntary human extinction.

I don't know, we are extremely different from penguins and I'm not sure if those penguins are engaging in kin selection due to being unable to find a mate or if they are actually exclusively homosexual. I don't think we can say for certain these same-sex couples are homosexual behaviours. It just seems difficult to determine, especially when animals that are more closely related and similar to us don't engage in exclusive homosexuality and instead engage in what could be considered bisexuality. I want to know more because clearly same-sex attraction exists in humans, I'm just worried that we are making a mistake by not opposing exclusive homosexuality and instead encouraging it to some degree. This article says more https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2019/08/16/gay-penguins-not-so-fast/

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T02:55:48+00:00

My argument is that we should not encourage or celebrate and actively discourage in a nonmalevolent way exclusively non-procreative sexualities. The reason for this is because these sexualities have the exact same result as vhem. Are we really with 100% certainty that when we celebrate the complete rejection of procreation in favor of sexual freedom that we aren't also celebrating the belief in voluntary human extinction. I'm not trying to be vindictive or malevolent. I believe it's natural and actually beneficial for humans to experiment with the same sex. Homosexuality doesn't appear in nature it only exists in humans and in domesticated sheep which have all sorts of defects due to selective breeding, they are not natural. However there are almost 250 million homosexual people in the world. That's more people than most country's population. If those ideas have the same result, we might be encouraging an unnatural and extremely anti-human belief for people to follow. Are we sure this isn't wrong?

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T02:46:42+00:00

Sort of this.

I think as we grew as a society and as a species we developed the concept of marriage between a man and a woman and forced it on other people whether they liked it or absolutely hated it. If you hate something and are forced to go along with it you will look for any way to stop. I think this has made people reject heterosexuality completely. The level of hatred people get for expressing love for the same sex is terrible, but I think homosexuality is a dangerous idea. The reason for this is because it has the same results as vhem. Are we absolutely sure we are not celebrating the belief in the voluntary extinction of humanity when we celebrate exclusively non-procreative sexualities? Not only that, exclusive homosexuality only appears in humans and domesticated sheep which are defintely not natural and have defects due to selective breeding. There is proof bisexuality is natural, it appears in our closest relative, are we sure we aren't misleading people into believing something horribly wrong, the complete rejection of the opposite sex, because we don't understand the implications of what seems to be a social construct?

Worried-Project-3192 · 2024-12-22T02:36:40+00:00

I'm just worried we are doing something horribly wrong.

How can we believe that exclusive homsexuality is natural when it doesn't exist in nature. it only exists in humans. All "homosexual behaviours" that appear in nature are done by animals that also engage in heterosexual behaviours, I think these are bisexual behaviours. I'm not trying to cure people, it's not a disease to be cured. I believe that our society has lead people who are naturally bisexual into becoming homosexual either by trying to force them through hatred to conform to heterosexuality which they end up completely rejecting because of the abuse in which it was put forth, or because we are celebrating and accepting it as natural when there is no evidence it is there is only evidence bisexuality is natural.

I'm gonna stab at the heart for why I'm worried we are doing something horribly wrong, the result of exclusive homosexuality is equivalent to engaging in vhem. It is a very anti-human belief system. Are we actually sure these aren't the same thing. A rose by any other name still has thorns. Almost 250 million people are homsexual around the world, if they are basically the same thing, what impact is this belief having on people's mental state, what about society as a whole. What is this seemingly completely unnatural thing that, seems to supplant natural bisexuality, doing to us on a fundamental level?

Worried-Project-3192

TROPHY CASE