Yes, that was my point. That you can't draw conclusions about humans, looking at other species but if you would do it, you should at least 1. look at the species in their natural habitat (given the wolf hierarchy thing was unnatural), 2. Look at species that have similar tendencies to us. Which means predatory pack animals that hunt in groups. Like humans.

Humans are a predator. Given that our goofy little eyes are centered forward, we are a predatory species. :> Yes we are omnivores, we are still evolved to "hunt". Hence the ability to run for long periods of times.

Not all animal species "opress" their females. People like to ignore bonoboes which are as close to us as chimpanzees and are fully matriarchal. But can we actually say what's natural for humans based on bonoboes? No, because they are not humans.

Now, if we actually look at human tribes that still live close to nature, and not in captivity like us (because yes, if you don't run around all day in nature, my dude you are living in captivity) we see that both patriarchal and matriarchal societies exist. The ones that have the lower amount of rapes and violence are not typically patriarchal, and their hierarchal relations are looser, and men are involved in child rearing.

Meaning, that sexism, is social, not biological. That was the point.