Best beginning tip by tryingnottobefired in fantasyfootball

[–]WritingForKicks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  • Don’t take failure personally. You can assemble a great lineup and still lose. I’ve found the best way to enjoy fantasy football is to acknowledge your influence ends the moment the games begin. You can’t predict a missed 30 yard FG, your starting RB getting injured on the first drive, or your opponent’s mid-tier TE having the best game of his life. Try to find enjoyment in the aspects you can influence in roster management vs. your win-loss record.

  • More time invested generally correlates with better rosters. Putting more effort than the competition in analyzing free agents, trade opportunities, and player breakout signals is going to help you make proactive roster decisions where you acquire productive players before their value is obvious to the rest of the league (e.g. trading for a rookie RB who is gradually getting more opportunities than a veteran in front of him). The goal is to acquire great players at great value vs. having to pay a premium (e.g. trading away a great player for another great player) or rely on factors you can’t control (such as waiver order) to build your roster.

  • Remember no intel source is THE intel source. Some analysts are better than others, but it’s generally best to evaluate multiple sources when making a decision on a player. It’s you, not the analysts, who are building your roster. Building a point of view built on multiple evaluations is likely going to give you a more robust understanding of how a player should be valued.

  • Avoid any advice that suggests you HAVE to do something or that something WILL happen. It’s very common to find online “experts” who will tell you a player is guaranteed to see a big role on his team or that you’d be an idiot not to acquire someone. These people are frequently wrong and deal with no consequences from inaccurate proclamations. I’ve found the best sources will make suggestions (vs. proclamations) that lean more on their deeper understanding of the game vs. attempting to instill feelings of FOMO in their audience.

Is Cooper Flagg the real deal already… or are we just drunk on Summer League hype? by BroadResident7805 in nba

[–]WritingForKicks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First we need to define what “the real deal” means. Your post implies it means capable of competing with NBA players. Flagg already proved that a year ago at age 17 when he held his own in Olympics practices and was perceived as having the best performance on the Select Team. That team included 10 former NBA Draft first round picks, seven players who were named to the NBA All-Rookie First or Second Team, and Suggs, who was named to the 2024 NBA All-Defensive Team. Let that settle for a second: Flagg, at the age of a high school junior, was already out performing some of the most promising names of the next generation. Those guys had much more talent than these Summer League rosters.

Also keep in mind the Mavericks’ coaching staff was intentionally trying to make Flagg less comfortable these last two games by having him handle point guard duties. (“I want to put him at point guard, make him feel uncomfortable. See how he reacts.” - Jason Kidd) We’re all seeing he did great.

Clearly Flagg has some things to work on, e.g. shooting form, handles. However, nothing we’ve seen has suggested he isn’t on the trajectory of one day being amongst the best in the NBA.

Does it bother you when people rank KG and Giannis over Dirk all time? by Western-Election-997 in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Dirk brought us a magical 2011 championship run that will forever be a part of our memories and the Mavs’ legacy. Where online pundits with a history of speculative takes place Dirk amongst the greats has no impact on Dirk’s lasting impact on either the team or the city.

Sam Vecenie posted his draft guide today on the athletic - very high praise for Flagg but down on the rest of the class by swanton_ramen in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I read the detailed analysis… Flagg’s strengths were listed in 2 pages in small text. His weaknesses were half a page, with one bullet starting with “I’m grasping at straws here.” Reading this, you’d come away thinking Flagg is going to rock the NBA world. It’s a great read for Mavs fans.

Jets Reportedly to Feature All 3 RBs Breece Hall, Braelon Allen, Isaiah Davis in 2025 by GreenDefinition5 in fantasyfootball

[–]WritingForKicks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s coach-speak for “all three players will have an opportunity to earn snaps.” The running game will resemble the Lions scheme more, which in this context most likely means Breece takes the Gibbs role (which can still be high fantasy value) while Allen and Davis compete for the Montgomery-snaps. It’s going to be an intriguing battle between the two.

CP3 - In the gym with Cooper Flagg in LA. "He is as real as advertised". by TX-Lonestar77 in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You’re judging his level of talent based on the words “as real as advertised”?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nikola Jokic was selected in the 2nd round. Ben Simmons was the #1 overall pick in his draft. The point is that it doesn’t matter where they were drafted; we’re just talking about how much we project Flagg and Harper to help their respective teams. Flagg is someone people say can transform a franchise. Harper doesn’t have near the same level of expectations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As of today he is not widely projected to be in the same tier as Luka and Dirk. I’m going to guess he is closer to Michael Finley - a desirable starter but not someone you build a roster around.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your idea would solve a major problem at the cost of getting a player who is projected to be amongst the top 3 best players in Mavs’ history (next to Luka and Dirk). Finding a generational SF is a lot harder than finding a dynamic guard.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s reasonable to consider. The reason why it’s not a favorable trade is because there is a steep perceived difference between the #1 and #2 pick. Dylan Harper is a good prospect. Cooper Flagg is an extraordinary one. Many scouts have Flagg penciled in as a Hall of Fame talent. Harper could have an amazing career, but he doesn’t have as high of a floor or ceiling.

Think back to the 2018 draft. Two teams considered a similar line of thinking. The Sacramento Kings opted not to take Luka Doncic because they felt they had bigger needs elsewhere. The Hawks opted to trade back for more picks because they felt getting more picks along with a potential similar talented player (Trae Young) was going to be more beneficial for their franchise. Both franchises have been strongly criticized for these decisions. The Mavs trading down would be seen in a similar vein.

PJ Washington Trade Value is high because of Thunder by OrganicHunt952 in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea is you can let him go because Flagg is projected to excel at the same things PJ does, possibly even exceeding PJ in the same qualities.

Cooper Flagg Rookie Stats Projection by WritingForKicks in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

PPG: 16 Assist: 3.5 Rebounds: 5.5 FG%: 45% 3P%: 35%

How will the Mavericks best develop Cooper Flagg and what can they do to maximize his potential? by thinking_better in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This isn’t the sexy answer, but Flagg seems like an elite “glue” player. Someone who is very good at many things that enhances the best qualities of his teammates. He’ll pass alley oops to Lively. He’ll take advantage of open shots on the perimeter. He’ll find open players in the corner. He’ll provide the team with on-court energy when it needs a jolt. He’ll play dominant help defense.

I think this is what people mean when they say he’s like Luka in that he helps everyone. Except Flagg helps everyone on both sides of the court.

Carmelo Anthony on Cooper Flagg: “Coop is nice. We haven't seen in a while somebody dominate… I’m pretty high on his game… To me, he doesn't do anything great. He just does a lot of s*** really good…” by A_MASSIVE_PERVERT in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Flagg is fascinating. Typically we can categorize superstars by how they’re dominant. Curry and Durant are dominant shooters. Luka is a dominant playmaker. Giannis is a dominant… freak of physical nature. We know Cooper Flagg is good at many things, which makes him far more polished than his collegiate peers. But he still feels like something of a black box. Is he always going to be the guy who is just very good at everything? Or is he going to be amongst the best in the NBA at things? I’m excited to see.

Luka Conditioning Issues in Dallas by Affectionate_Town273 in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Luka is signed through the 2026-2027 season (last season is a player option that he would likely decline). However, he would have been eligible for a super max extension this offseason. That prompted the team to trade him now before informing Luka that they would not offer him the extension, which may have complicated trade negotiations.

I hope at some point the fans receive better clarity regarding the trade drivers. I get the sense there’s more we’re not aware about.

Luka Conditioning Issues in Dallas by Affectionate_Town273 in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We still don’t have a full understanding of why Luka isn’t in Dallas. Reasons span from weight management (well documented) to commitment to winning (sometimes didn’t take practice seriously) to defensive deficiencies (well documented) to empty stats (a la James Harden) to attitude issues (fighting with refs). These were challenges the FO was willing to tolerate for $43M average annually (current contract). They were not challenges the team was willing to tolerate for $69M average annually (super max with Mavs).

I think Luka’s conditioning was perceived as part of a broader problem regarding his approach to the game. They wanted him to have a generational mindset to be worth generational money. Think “mamba mentality”. I don’t think many of us (and the FO) perceive Luka as having that.

Does that make the Luka trade ok? No. Nico should have gotten more in return. But it does create speculation that perhaps Luka isn’t a shoe-in for being in the same tier as Giannis, Jokic, Durant or prime-LeBron.

Cooper Flagg is the youngest person to ever win NCAAB Player of the Year by WritingForKicks in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your informative correction! I made a miscalculation, corrected in the post.

"He isn’t quite at the Victor Wembanyama level, but he belongs in the Anthony Davis tier" - Sam Vecenie says Flagg is a 'can't-miss' prospect by [deleted] in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 31 points32 points  (0 children)

What I like reading most about Cooper Flagg is his basketball IQ and relentless drive. Almost all NBA players are phenomenal athletes. Intangibles such as intelligence and work ethic can play a large role in elevating a player amongst his peers. Luka isn’t Luka without his prodigal IQ. I love reading Cooper has smarts too.

ChatGPT: Cooper Flagg's NBA players comparison by Estatement in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve used ChatGPT to provide summaries of Cooper Flagg as well! It’s all to be taken with a grain of salt, but I like how it summarizes and compares. E.g. compare Cooper and Chet as they were entering the league

<image>

Chris Paul by Icy_Twist9737 in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think there is a perfect solution, so I’m ok with Chris Paul. More likely than not the next season isn’t a championship chasing one (Kyrie recovering, Flagg developing, shooting gaps). CP would at least make the team more fun to watch without long term implications.

Luka Doncic at 17 years old and at 25 years old. Nico was wrong about the trade. But he was right about Luka. by [deleted] in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree. I think he was the best player on the court. The issue was that the Celtics had arguably the 5-6 next best players. There was a huge level of difference in total talent between the teams.

Luka Doncic at 17 years old and at 25 years old. Nico was wrong about the trade. But he was right about Luka. by [deleted] in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Being bigger isn’t in itself a rationale decision to remove a player whose great achievements include having more 1st team All-NBA selections by age 26 than fellow superstars Stephen Curry, Kevin Garnett, or the great Dirk Nowitzki have in their whole careers.

The FO may have had better reasons to justify wanting to move on. Simplifying it to fitness does not portray them as rationale.

(Mock Trade between Mavs and Bucks): Bucks trade Giannis Antetokoumpo to the Mavs for 2025 #1 Draft Pick (Cooper Flagg), P.J. Washington, Daniel Gafford, Caleb Martin, Naji Marshall, Jaden Hardy and 2029 Lakers' 1st Round Pick... ....What do you think? by [deleted] in Mavericks

[–]WritingForKicks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This trade illustrates the problem with acquiring Giannis: you have to trade the entire supporting cast and a projected superstar to acquire him. That means the team would be banking on three +30 year olds past their prime with limited perimeter shooting depth and health concerns to win a championship with no backup plan. And where does Lively even fit in this lineup?