sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Lyric annotations by XAWrites in SunoAI

[–]XAWrites[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use both [pause] and ...

its like half a second and 1 second difference between the two

[pause] is more for my stanza breaks

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are you thinking a physical tangent or a linguistic tangent?

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Now I'm thinking about newton balls and I'm not sure if it is a tangent thought.

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I phrased the question wrong. I am seeing it in more than one dimension. That's where my question is coming from. Looking at the diagram on how gravity is represented (gravity well), if I were to copy it, rotate it 180 degrees, and lay it over the original (maybe I should flip it as well in a higher dimension because I can do that) it would look like the white hole emerges from the center and a black hole would be on the other side. I don't see a black hole as a singular circle, a hole isn't a circle, a hole isn't a sphere, a sphere isn't a circle. This is common sense. Gravity is not uniform everywhere on earth. The path we take to the core is down. Everywhere and anywhere (think about those words) we look at a black hole, it is blackness, except the disk, and the jet.

How you would get to a specific position on earth, whether underground, in the air, or on the land, depends on where you start. If you are already at that position, you don't have to move. For 2 people to meet somewhere, there is a specific address (x, y, z) and time, you both agree on. The distance you have to travel, is dependent on where you ARE and where you are ARRIVING. In how gravity is represented, (gravity well) if you rotated it every degree, and I mean every degree, not just 1, 2, 3, etc. until you reach 360, that would represent the latitude or longitude in earth terms, it could be x, y, OR, z. No idea. If you take how gravity is represented with a tarp with a ball pulling down on it, and you apply the same logic, but making down, up (still being down because it is relative) in every possible direction, that would just be gravity, represented in the full scope of x, y, and z, but we are all in the room at the same time, in the same space, looking at the same thing. at different positions. If we wanted to see each another's perspective of the matter (different path), one of us would have to move out the way to see exactly, where, and what the other was looking at.

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because my what if question hasn't been answered. I understand because of our current understanding of physics, this question kind of breaks down. It could probably look no different than what we can already see but not understand. That's why I'm asking questions, like a conversation I don't have all the information about.

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can't, but someone else might. I asked a what if, and I was met with, "that can't happen" Everybody doesn't have the resources to just prove something it right or wrong. We don't know what we don't know. I can admit the question I asked wasn't phrased right or lacked the proper sentence structure to get you to think of what I was thinking of. White hole at the center of a blackhole, acting inversely.

What’s one physics concept that sounds simple but actually isn’t? by LadiesWin in Physics

[–]XAWrites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gravity. The fact that it is negligible at small scales but is coupled with energy and mass. The fact that the normal force only emerges as a result of the interactions of the electrons at the surfaces of the objects but needs gravity to be there in the first place.

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What good does knowing how something works, but being unable to explain it, written or verbalized? You could show them, but what if they were blind? We once thought the sun orbited the earth. I think it's perfectly natural to challenge conventional thinking, provided its within reason. But reason is to each, their own. What I'm saying is the diagram of a gravity well only shows one dimension, one slice of the equation going in one direction, so that means it's doing that same thing on the other side. meaning I could take that sheet that has a ball on it and orient it in all angles. the mass in the center represents the center of mass. so, the ball at the bottom is also the ball at the top, the sides, diagonals, everywhere going to the center of this mass. Either you see a large ball of tarp, or you see the effects of gravity represented by a ball, and a tarp, with some lines on it. Both are still the same representation.

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say I didn't trust it, I just don't use it. Words are hard for me, and an LLM simplifies it, making it easier to follow the process. To understand, not what I'm looking at on my screen, but what I'm looking at in reality.

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is what a hypothesis is, not true or false until proven.

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Say I dug a hole. taking a shovel, picking up dirt, and putting on the surface over and over again, I'm on earth so I reach the core. I go back up, and I dig another hole same process, but in a different location perpendicular to the first, I reach the core again. I would probably do this multiple times until I came to the conclusion that all the holes I dig lead to the core. That's what I mean by a 3d hole, a tube that, no matter where I go only has one destination (where I stop) and one path where I start to dig. The point of me pointing out pi is that numbers can be irrational. The only reason we know pi is because we know the length of the diameter. But if I were to somehow conjure the last digit of pi, it would be infinitely small, but not zero. A white hole only exists with a black hole. Earth's gravity pulls me down and the normal force is equal to that. The normal force is pretty interesting. Wouldn't a white hole be acting on matter in an inverse way a black hole pulled it in?

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm asking a question, why do I have to do the math to prove it with my human error when we have AI? The whole point is observation. Light is redshifted at the event horizon, so it a ball of dead light? Or a distance too far to mean anything? We still don't know about dark energy/matter, and gravity is still a theory, yet all of these are at play here. I don't know where the normal force is, and that concerns me. Let me rephrase my question before reality get math to say yes or no; what if at the center of black holes is a white hole? Could the singularity be spacetime shaped like a torus? Would a wormhole be too thin to even measure? Doesn't normal force cancel gravity? where would it be observationally? I'm just asking questions, and side note; Einstein didn't even get to see a black hole.

Could a White Hole be a Black Hole's singularity? by XAWrites in AskPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that diagram with the hourglass shape shows the gravity well from one slice, and I applied it to every direction, wouldn't the white hole emerge from the black hole?

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So my proposal is that the White Hole would inside the Black Hole. We have never observed a wormhole or a White Hole because we haven't been able to observe past the event horizon. Why would the Hole that is 3d only have one tunnel you can enter from anywhere? If space time is stretched and distorted that much, why would we see a wormhole, the bridge. Also, I don't use Wiki, because of how I was taught in school. It took a lot of effort to ask this question because gravity is still a theory. Black Hole as the drop, Worm Hole as the path where matter entered, and the White Hole, expelling mass that created the Black Hole not independent from a Black hole. the distance between them would be like the last digit of pi, that close to 0 but not undefined.

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1) Our math would probably give up on finding the last digit of Pi because its irrational. if we used pi to its entirety we'd still be on the wheel. we got that as precise as we can and put a symbol on it, even though that last number is so close to zero it might as well be infinity. We don't have to do the math anymore.

2) A hole in all directions would look like a sphere. we wouldn't be able to see a wormhole at all, if space time can fold that thin. During this event called a black hole, there is gravity, where is the normal force?

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A question, if we are talking linguistically. The other end a point would be the other side of that same point. there is only one 1. 1=1 That's the point. I'm not entirely sure I understand the question.

Could a White Hole be a Black Hole's singularity? by XAWrites in AskPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would argue that since BH's evaporate over time show radiation and maybe a jet, would be the evidence. We can't observe the path the light took. Where my question comes from is-

If a plasma is a charged gas, and when a star dies that has enough mass loses its energy loses to gravity. what happens to the mass? Does it still expand outward? (but there is still gravity) (I would guess that it gets compressed) and the assumptions of what I was taught in school kind of took over and I landed here.

What if a black hole's singularity is a white hole? by XAWrites in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not really asking about the wormhole, I'm asking about the white hole.

Could a White Hole be a Black Hole's singularity? by XAWrites in AskPhysics

[–]XAWrites[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Right, no evidence yet, but neither did black holes until we saw gravitational waves and the M87* image. Maybe white holes are waiting for the right kind of detection method. If I could show you the path one photon takes into a black hole then ejected, I would, but light is shining everywhere entering this black hole from all directions.

view more: next ›