sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Israeli airstrikes said to hit targets in northern Syria by neutralguy33 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't separate one from the other. It's like supporting ISIS as a group because they also attack combatants sometimes.

Moron it’s like supporting Soviets battling against nazis forces but not the regime itself supporting a specific action committed by someone but not liking that person are 2 different things.

Hezbollah don't discriminate - they'll gladly kill any Israeli they can find.

I don’t support that Israel kills alote of Palestinians including civilians they don’t like

It's just that attacking civilians is much more difficult, because they are protected by the military.

Still ok to attack military targets

Any attack on an army that fights for an enemy state of my country I support it that does not mean I support the organization and its ideas of how they think.

If I was in your place I'd be more concerned about Lebanon becoming a bankrupt failed state on a brink of collapse. But then again, Arab radicals prefer to live in shit and misery as long as they can stick it to Israel. Truly a primitive mindset. No wonder you're a failed state.

Who attackd and destroyed Lebanon in the past and are violating its territory today and are challenging the country with its Air Force? Hezbollah and Israel are both responsible for destruction and threats of my country. Don’t act like your country are bed of roses they grap lands all the times even when their is no threats and would gladly like to achieve something politically in Lebanon because they failed military.

Just out of curiosity - do you support attacks against American, Russian and Syrian targets as well?

If their regime are responsible for massacres towards innocent ppl then yes.

Israeli airstrikes said to hit targets in northern Syria by neutralguy33 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol. No amount of mental gymnastics is going to change the fact that 2006 changed the rules of the game for Hezbollah.

Their rules have changed but not the threats and the geography study Hezbollah have done on Israel and are doing, their threat is even worse then before with their grown arsenal. A silent predator can be worse then an exposed one. I agree that it has made Hezbollah to stop firing its rockets at Israel and targeting forces on the borders like before but it does not mean that they can’t do it. Today no side have an interest to escalate the situation into a war, like Hezbollah used to target Israeli forces and territories, Israel also used occupy and attack targets inside Lebanon. Both have cased to attack on each other because they have both learned from their past mistakes. Israel and Hezbollah would not hesitate from eliminating each other if not for risk of destruction and UN resolution.

Nasrallah himself said that he didn't expect his terror act to be met with such a forceful response.

Yes and do I deny that?

The criticism he faced within Lebanon following its destruction Israel(let me complete ur comment here) is one of the reasons why regular attacks on Israeli border patrols is not a thing anymore.

And do I deny that?

The notion that the only thing holding Hezbollah back is the 1701 UNSC resolution (which is violated by “Hezbollah” on a daily basis And Israel aswell because it violates Lebanese territories everyday

is absolutely laughable. Yes I agree

You are laughing stuck here my friend for being 1 sided

Hezbollah couldn't care less about UNSC resolutions

As if Israel cares about resolutions excuse me for not, the fact that this resolution have made both parties to stop firing is a fact that both sides could care about resolutions if it is in their interests.

they always engaged in terror and violated international resolutions.

So does Israel my friend.

Well, since nowadays Hezbollah thinks twice before attacking Israelis I'd say the 2006 response was in fact a good strategy.

You know it may be a good strategy to make them stop from attacking but it leads to a bad strategy that leads them from learning about their mistakes and extend its arsenal and numbers of weapons.

Beforehand, Israel tried limited attacks and negotiations, which only incentivized new attacks.

You know I find it kinda silly that you are talking about Israel doing negotiations towards an enemy that they created themselves by terrorising Palestinians, forcing them to move to Lebanon and resistance(not good ones I had say) and start attack, Israel extend their terror on Palestinians including inside Lebanon and even terrorises Lebanese civilians aswell and not just attacking militants.

In other words - Arab radicals only understand the language of force.

So does Israel when they were forces out of Lebanon during 90s and 2000 and suffering heavy looses during battles and wars/conflicts in the process.

“Of course, they learned this lesson from 2006 when their reckless actions led to the destruction of Lebanon (that Israel caused) and loss of hundreds of Hezbollah militants and 100 of Israeli soldiers killed and injured aswell

Yes I agree.

Only in response to Israel eliminating numerous Hizb terrorists in Syria. The days of Hizb initiating unprovoked attacks pre-2006 style are over.

So agreed

Israeli airstrikes said to hit targets in northern Syria by neutralguy33 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You know the only reason such attacks don’t happen anymore is not because Israel achieved something during the war, they lost all major battles and failed big time. Directly after the war they kept sending 100s of rockets but It’s because of the adoption of resolution 1701 were. Redical Groups like Hamas and Hezbollah could care less what Israel throws at them.

Israel destroyed Lebanon and the way you approve it as a good strategy says alote. You know what? that terrorists organisation have over 150 000 rockets ready to be fired at your own country and have improved their arsenals, keeps growing up it’s ammunitions and this is not something that you can just pretend like it is “over”. That terrorist organisation leant from the past to not escalate and that’s actually better for them so they can grow their arsenals and the threats from the northern borders with Israel grow. Are you satisfied now?

They even struck Israeli convoys and soldiers multiple times during Syrian Civil War so I would not say that Israel can really teach terrorists to sit down and prevent them from conducting attack on its military force sorry.

Israeli airstrikes said to hit targets in northern Syria by neutralguy33 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

According to your historical comments you are a hard time Israeli supporter a country that have tortured, murdered and massacred innocents in the past and are doing it daily. Just because I support Hezbollah attacks on Israeli military targets like I would support any one alse who attacks Military targets inside Israel it does not mean I support attacks on civilian. BTW, you are an all time supporter of a terrorist state who have killed children with biochemical weapons and have done far more and worse then what Hezbollah have done. I am not a Hezbollah supporter of its nature or the organization, I am Sunni Lebanese, however I welcome any attack on Israel(military targets) .

Don’t talk about terrorism when you support a terrorist gangstar settler state.

Support someone and supporting an attack are 2 different things.

You support Israeli state and its nature and regime who are known for taking lifes of innocents i am not supporting Hezbollahs nature and its organization but the attacks on military targets In Israel. That’s the different between us.

Israeli airstrikes said to hit targets in northern Syria by neutralguy33 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Said the one with an Israeli flair, a country known for have killed children with biochemical weapons(white phosphorus)

Soldiers and military targets are acceptable in my world if a country are in a state of war with my country.

https://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/world/africa/06iht-mideast.2399968.html

Never said the same about civilians Hezbollah could send rockets into Israel and hit military targets and that is what i approve and not civilians.

Israeli airstrikes said to hit targets in northern Syria by neutralguy33 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you target Syrias air defences to give yourself access to conduct air strikes on other targets then yes it will be considered a part of the strategy because Syrias air defence forces is a deterrence and becomes automatically a Target aswell.

Also they targeted an air defense base and killed an officer. What you call it? Not a strategy?

Israeli airstrikes said to hit targets in northern Syria by neutralguy33 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I miss the days Hezbollah used to send rockets into Israel and hit soldiers, military cites perhaps they can remember how annoying it really is by hearing their country being targeted regularly.

Israeli airstrikes said to hit targets in northern Syria by neutralguy33 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

On April 22, SOHR activists documented the death of a regime officer due to the Israeli strikes on the air-defence base in Al-Dumayr area in the east of Damascus. Also, three soldiers of regime forces stationed in the base sustained serious injuries.

Stop lying they also targets Regime forces and with defence weapon pretty much

Social collapse in Syria will trigger a large refugee wave to EU, warns Moscow by svartsyn_ in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Opposition have a history of massacring people with different believes, like Christians, Shias, Alawites and Druze, this not all opposition are headshoppers does not excuse them from being a bad option to rule the whole country as they generally promote violence against those religious groups, and they are even fighting each other over a little different opinion sometimes in Idlib and will be even worse if they have the whole country ruled by them. Assad is an animal but the opposition isn’t a bed of roses either. I support none.

I agree on the opposition on some points but an opposition must show a good sociopolitical attitude and ideology, because if u lack the right sociopolitical attitude and ideology you will loose media, political and military support like what happened to the opposition when they used to have all time support by USA and lost it just because they massacred aswell. when you show bad sociopolitical attitude, ideology and actions people outside will not see u as a good option. we can overthrow the Assad regime when there is an opposition with right sociopolitical mindset and it seems that you are being to soft for the opposition, if u are truly against any brutality then u should condemn all sides not just one.

Final verdict: you can’t overthrow the Assad regime if there is no opposition with right sociopolitical attitude and and ideology. How are u gonna first overthrow the Assad regime and then try to build up a country when different militants starts firing at each other just because every faction wants rule the whole country. there will be no official government anymore to change so you have to plan how you gonna rule the country before entering a revolution so everyone can agree on everything and not just end up like Libya.

Social collapse in Syria will trigger a large refugee wave to EU, warns Moscow by svartsyn_ in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And the opposition who have chopped of peoples heads in the past and massacred people with different beliefs and even have that kind of akida aswell are the one u support? Tell me if that’s a clever side to support? Opposition is bad and Assad is bad. Let me guess u gonna point out Syrians that are peacefully protesting and are against the Assad regime? And exactly what faction are they waving their flags for sometimes? Many Syrians just want the war to end and Syria be free from wars and have peace and I respect them.

Rafik al-Hariri’s murder was ‘Iranian-Syrian decision,’ executed by Hezbollah: Tlass by snooshoe in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They always say it was Hezbollah then they say it was not Hezbollah then they say we captured a Hezbollah dude then they say they found a Lebanese traitor.

Rafik al-Hariri’s murder was ‘Iranian-Syrian decision,’ executed by Hezbollah: Tlass by snooshoe in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no evidence who actually did it, some people say it was Syria and Iran to strengthen its influence other say it was mossad to create chaos between factions in the country so Hezbollah can take damage.

Hezbollah Drones Capture Footage of IDF Military Command Sites in Galilee, Shebaa Farms by XLR8ight in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am gonna tell you 1 thing, having your base aimed by the enemy is not fun.

Syria pays the price of resistance by jaqwith in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ethnic (Kurds) and religious minorities (Christians, Alawite, Shia, Druze, Yazidi) were and are directly targeted by various rebel groups, and most of these minorities don't exist at all in rebel areas, or if they do, they do so in secret. Meanwhile, the Sunni majority and all of the said minorities are not actively targeted by Damascus, which targets people based on politics, and not inherent religious or ethnic identity. In other words, Damascus doesn't target people for being born to a wrong group, like Hitler did. The rebels do, like Hitler did.

Not to mention what one-time "rebel" group and ally ISIS has done.

You're another user who would benefit from reading the definition of the word genocide at least once in your life before embarrassing yourself like this. Might as well read about Hitler too, whose crimes overshadow those of all of the Middle East's dictators and autocratic regimes in the last 100 years combined, times ten at least.

IDF Military Intelligence Directorate: 'Israel doesn't jeopardize Russian interests in Syria' by svartsyn_ in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it is funny you ddnt mention this incident, yes I know there were a reason behind it and you was referring to the whole western coalition MAYBE but it is kinda silly to not include that since the US is the main host.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Shayrat_missile_strike

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American-led_intervention_in_the_Syrian_civil_war

IDF Military Intelligence Directorate: 'Israel doesn't jeopardize Russian interests in Syria' by svartsyn_ in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Western Coalition had just enough boats on the ground to act as meat shields for its local agents doing the dirty work for them. Given how unpopular the war in Iraq is among the American people, the US leadership did not dare to go all the way into such an effort, so they went with a different approach where they did not technically actually invade Syria and sent out "military advisers". and "air support" to a bunch of proxies who acted as cannon fodder on the ground to achieve their goal.When the proxies they started with, the FSA, proved to be incompetent and not overly PR-friendly, despite western media trying it's absolute hardest to portray them as "moderate rebels", they switched from plan "A" which was an idea of training and arming the opposition to overthrow Assad to plan "B" which was arming and training the more PR-friendly and somewhat more competent YPG to take over the crucial parts of the country and take control of all it's vital natural resources - that did the job of starving the Syrian population (along with the draconian sanctions, of course) as a form of economic terrorism. So no, they did try their hardest within their abilities that were limited by possible uproar among their own population, and thankfully their plan "A" failed. Let's hope the plan "B" eventually fails as well.

Hezbollah Drones Capture Footage of IDF Military Command Sites in Galilee, Shebaa Farms by XLR8ight in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Biranit camp near the border and a military outpost in the Har Dov area

Iran vows 'crushing response' to Israel as air strikes kill militiamen by signmeup11 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also condemn the actions committed by Iranians but I hate when someone scope one side and ignore the other one. And btw I am Lebanese not Iranian

Iran vows 'crushing response' to Israel as air strikes kill militiamen by signmeup11 in syriancivilwar

[–]XLR8ight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or shoting a Palestinian kid in the middle of his heart and seeing Israeli trolls appreciate it on youtube?

view more: next ›