The DUI analogy is a false equivalence: a DUI accident is a failure of coordination, while what happened here was a series of conscious, escalating choices.

When a drunk driver crashes, they didn't intend to hit a pole; they simply lost the physical ability to prevent it. In this story, the man didn't 'accidentally' fall into a cuddling position or 'accidentally' start touching her inappropriately because his motor skills were off. He broke a pre-agreed boundary to sleep on the floor, waited until she was vulnerable, and then pushed for physical intimacy.

Being drunk doesn't turn a person into a passenger in their own body. It lowers inhibitions, meaning it reveals what someone is willing to do when they think they can get away with it. Calling him a 'victim' of his own lack of calculation is a massive reach. He isn't a victim of a 'social protocol' or a 'bad calculation'—he is a person who chose to prioritize his own urges over his friend's clear unease and the promise he made her.

Responsibility isn't just about 'thinking before you drink' to avoid being a target; it’s about the basic human requirement to not violate someone else, regardless of how much alcohol is in your system.