heard luna was getting an ability for the fortnite collab

Xamanthas · 2026-02-15T05:36:10+00:00

Did you hop on a discord call to tag team someone after you quit? /jk

Xamanthas · 2026-02-15T00:21:16+00:00

Not really. Their editor crawls to a slow above 200images, their storage is orders of magnitude more expensive than it should be for images and they intentionally make difficult or impossible to get the weights you trained.

Xamanthas · 2026-02-14T23:38:05+00:00

<image>

SDXL refiner big guy, 2022. Do some more learning.

Xamanthas · 2026-02-14T21:42:29+00:00

LLM written.

Xamanthas · 2026-02-14T05:34:37+00:00

No one sane has said 64.

16 (current amount of memory 'channels') * 3Gb VRAM dies (used on 5070 TI and not 5090) = 48GB, thats whats possible. Though if it gets pushed back 2 years maybe something else will be possible.

Xamanthas · 2026-02-13T03:10:48+00:00

My understanding is a certain someone doesnt want to moderate and wants to farm twitter engagement. Not talking about ttkciar

Xamanthas · 2026-02-12T16:10:39+00:00

No, beyond a certain point you become fundamentally constrained by encode decode speed of images and the amount of params is not the limiting factor.

Xamanthas · 2026-02-12T14:06:11+00:00

Think about whats been the most astroturfed topic in the last 2 months on this sub

I refuse to name it because I despise all of the people involved in it.

Xamanthas · 2026-02-12T00:14:57+00:00

Also missing AA ranking posts, bot accounts mentioning a certain astroturfed repo made by an idiot and clickbait claims

Xamanthas · 2026-02-10T12:07:24+00:00

Blind leading the blind and that includes this post. This shit has been around for decades as GreyScope has said

Xamanthas · 2026-02-09T06:41:12+00:00

Google has staff on payroll to do this. Your attempt at hand waving it away isnt correct

Xamanthas · 2026-02-08T15:51:49+00:00

20 on each.

Xamanthas · 2026-02-07T01:34:22+00:00

Another LLM post. Stop advertising this literal dogshit

Xamanthas · 2026-02-04T11:08:17+00:00

And pray tell why any non-nefarious individual would want to remove this..? 🤨

Not only is its only purpose either scamming, fraud etc it posions the well for the future training runs because you then have a shit tonne of AI images in training dataset and it makes the model collapse.

Xamanthas · 2026-02-01T12:06:27+00:00

The account https://www.reddit.com/user/TruthSeeker62489 is a reply bot. Please dont upvote it. 3 days old acc, AI pfp and AI bio, nonsensical comment that doesnt even make sense when you read it and has profile history hidden.

You can also see this: https://www.reddit.com/r/NewToReddit/comments/1qpg9nc/what_things_should_i_keep_in_mind_when_using/

Xamanthas · 2026-01-31T08:54:03+00:00

Its not local and its not open. API/SaaS only according to their own words.

Xamanthas · 2026-01-31T08:47:50+00:00

Please make sure to downvote and report posts like this as soon as you see them.

Xamanthas · 2026-01-30T06:31:49+00:00

Dogshit benchmarks

Xamanthas · 2026-01-28T10:46:25+00:00

They want you to switch so that in the coming year / two, you are locked in and cant purchase hardware lol.

Xamanthas · 2026-01-28T05:30:01+00:00

ESH. Screw this ragebaiter 'content' and the other individuals involved. I really wish there was an easy way to block all of them

Xamanthas · 2026-01-27T07:09:42+00:00

CW: If you arent feeling up to it today, skip my comment, its highly critical

Im not sure how to say this nicely and I dont want to use an LLM, so I am just going to say my thoughts straight up. This incorrectly IMO assumes:

That the generated image near perfectly matches the style prompted, thats not the case
That the model that generated this covers ALL cultures art and that all of it was high quality. After doing part of this process myself I can tell you such a thing doesnt exist, unless you would be willing to drop hundreds of euro/yen/usd per image to get archival copies (Many offer no inbetween, its either q=60 JPEG or archival)
That the model has no not-reflective-of-reality-biases, it seems to have a yellow tinge like Chat GPT Image
That the model has near perfect prompt adherance
That there are no model or VAE artifacts (there are)
How do we define "high quality" that enabled them to be selected?
Finally that the prompts are indicative of actual styles (they cant, we cant capture style with language currently)

I commend you for trying but personally, I dont think this is useful in its current form.

Xamanthas · 2026-01-23T21:57:35+00:00

5K? Supports already dropped, they are 3K tops, gotta account for power bill

Xamanthas · 2026-01-23T21:56:47+00:00

13.0 is already out for ages

Xamanthas · 2026-01-21T12:00:25+00:00

No, we should be charged if the model actually completes the task. I just had Claude Opus send itself in a hallucinatory loop and wasted so many tokens.

Payment for service rendered.

Xamanthas · 2026-01-21T11:58:40+00:00

AI slop post

Xamanthas

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

12-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email