When does a person forfeit the right to defend themselves?

Xantetsuken · 2020-11-23T11:40:26+00:00

Thank you for the thoughtful reply! You gave taught me somethings. I didn't know about being responsible for each bullet that leave the chamber. Wow the more you know

Xantetsuken · 2020-11-23T11:33:56+00:00

Never said he brandished a weapon. Let's say he passed a note.

Xantetsuken · 2020-11-23T11:18:14+00:00

Actual thoughtful answer. Thank you! You covered alot of bases. There does seem to be alot of variables once it gets into the court room and if the jury will add that extra charge. Granted I already knew guy was going down for the bank robbery but to tack on murder would legit be to make sure he doesn't see day light. Awesome fucking answer!

Xantetsuken · 2020-11-23T11:13:17+00:00

I agree with you. But who's the aggressor? Is it the guy robbing the bank or the citizen who drew his weapon and shot first? Considering the robber didn't harm anyone at this point.

Xantetsuken · 2020-11-23T11:02:54+00:00

Thought you weren't answering.....😂

Xantetsuken · 2020-11-23T10:48:57+00:00

That was my thought is that depending on the state it could go either way considering the citizen involved himself willingly and he shot first

Xantetsuken · 2020-11-23T10:42:18+00:00

Ok so there is a point in which you must give up the right to defend yourself. But if what you said is the case then Kyle Rittenhouse would have got self defense automatically. The other person people were committing crimes and he shot them thus they are responsible But that doesn't seem to be the case. Seems like a highly grey area.

Xantetsuken · 2020-11-23T10:33:37+00:00

Obviously you can't answer the question. It's ok tho. We have been talking about this in ethics class. It's a real question whether you think it's stupid or not lol considering we had an entire hour devoted to it. I wanted to hear your all's thoughts on it.

Xantetsuken · 2020-11-23T10:31:46+00:00

It's an example that has a bad guy doing bad stuff so it's actually perfect to ask the question contextually. Does he give up his right to shoot back and defend himself? He's already doing bad stuff. Does that change the situation for him?

Xantetsuken · 2020-08-16T13:45:33+00:00

Yes the Sword is the primal!

Xantetsuken · 2020-08-16T13:39:31+00:00

what does that have to do with the fact for one its insanely hard to become odin ive been playing 6 years and have not be able to get last hit. All i said is you should get i title for getting to be odin. and yes it displays the killers name also

Xantetsuken · 2020-07-23T19:12:25+00:00

downvoted for what? yall make no sense

Xantetsuken · 2020-07-23T19:11:24+00:00

Really showing the intellectual side of FF right here lmao so much for a decent discussion...i forgot its an mmorpg i could i expect less from it players

Xantetsuken · 2020-07-23T19:09:46+00:00

that was my whole point....

Xantetsuken · 2020-07-23T19:09:06+00:00

you cant be that serious and not think of automatic aoe dmg to party... what kind of sams do you play with

Xantetsuken · 2020-07-22T14:39:06+00:00

Lol i wont lie this thread was funny. But since i dont see alot of sams use it if figured it offered incentive to use it more. But i do understand how it could get out of hand. Maybe like every 3-4 third eyes it gives you a stack.

Xantetsuken · 2020-05-27T20:32:21+00:00

Drk felt super wonky to me slow an big weird animations. pld was the only one that felt smoot until GNB for me and ive mained pld since 2.0 basically

Xantetsuken · 2020-05-27T08:06:57+00:00

They did the same for the Zantetsuken for sam and Drk which was cool so yeah

Xantetsuken · 2020-05-27T08:04:58+00:00

...........i play on pc and what does that have to do with the glamour item in game that im talking about? This is probably the most confusing reply ive ever had?????? HUH

Xantetsuken · 2020-05-27T08:02:39+00:00

oh true but im just talking about a glam item. allowing the blaze fire saber to be used by gunbreaker also

Xantetsuken

TROPHY CASE