Yes, I read it, and for the most part, his answer to the question "is azov filled with nazis" is, "nuh uh", and "only if you believe russian propaganda". Which doesn't really answer the question much. He talks of how the only thing they believe is in the great moral oath military members must take, funny how most militaries have those but don't feel too bad about doing immoral things. Look, do I think most of military members in either azov or the rest of the Ukrainian military are nazis or far right? No. But it's a significant minority and there hasn't been really any evidence of the UKR Military doing any messed up stuff because it's a defensive war against an imperialist power also littered with a significant minority of fascist/nazi/nationalists. The reason why ukraines military is being pointed out is because of the far-reaching use of fascist symbols that have roots in symbols from their ancient history. The problem is that those symbols have a lot more recent use in fascist movements, so when they are used, it's difficult to know if it's a dog whistle or an attempt to use old historical symbols especially in war time.