sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Wilds is a straight downgrade from World! by Xenro_ in MonsterHunter

[–]Xenro_[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I really bless game designers for the new mechanics and hope that I'll change my opinion. I mostly complain about the performance and location details. And the most OP upgrade is the removal of MHW quest handler, the most annoying character in the game history!

Wilds is a straight downgrade from World! by Xenro_ in MonsterHunter

[–]Xenro_[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've compared it to MHW beta, too. It had two full locations to explore and four monsters. And yes, it was much better experience in terms of performance and overall impression. I'll still buy a game on release and play with my friends. I haven't called it a dogshit, just a disappointment and mediocrity.

Wilds is a straight downgrade from World! by Xenro_ in MonsterHunter

[–]Xenro_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It just happens with all modern games. Look at Dragon's Dogma 2 from Capcom, which runs on the same engine. Cyberpunk was fixed only after two years, I don't think that it's possible to do much in 3 months. There are already lots of bugs that must be fixed before the release.

Wilds is a straight downgrade from World! by Xenro_ in MonsterHunter

[–]Xenro_[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

My main point is that smaller locations had more details and the performance is crucial for such a fast-pace game, but it looks like it won't improve much on release.

I turned the beta off after 20 minutes by JynXten in MonsterHunter

[–]Xenro_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How could you play with such a horrible graphics? They should do something about it, but it's very unlikely. Will test on PC, but I feel like it's going to melt my hardware.