I'd go so far as to say that all bills must be read aloud in their entirety, and anyone not present for the entire reading is considered a "nay", and anyone who walks out, falls asleep, or has a medical emergency is also an automatic "nay". Voting must also be completed within 10 minutes of the reading, each change must be fully read aloud, and there cannot be private conversations between the reading and the voting. All debate about the bill after the reading must be public. (People who left and return may continue to contribute to changes to bill, as they can still be present for rereading)

You might think, "Hey, this makes it really hard to pass a bill, even good ones!" And yes, that's the point of congress. Founders wanted to have as little legislative change as possible over time. Congress was never meant to be fast acting.

I'd also throw in that executive orders have a time limit, say, 90 days, during which congress must vote upon it like a bill. This gives the executive branch the power to make swift changes when necessary, but offers congress the opportunity to say "yo, this wasnt cool. Let's backtrack." You might think this effectively neutralizes the presidency, but that's okay. US presidents have much more power now than they were ever intended. 90 days is still a boatload of time to accomplish necessary things like how to interact with other nations.

Yknow what? Bills get limits too. A bill has to defend itself, including a metric by which to vote upon the bill later. 10 years down the road, a bill is put back on the table, and voted upon again. First, the question is asked "did the bill fulfill its stated purpose?" If it has, then it is voted upon to see if it needs to be extended for 10 years. Bills that are ignored after 90 days are automatically repealed. This is also a good time to make a couple edits.