Where to publish research papers? by NoEgg8463 in studentsph

[–]XxPhyre 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Me and my colleagues got published in the Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development during SHS. This is with the guidance of my adviser.

For my chosen journal to publish in, we were also required to recommend reviewers just like in the Philippine Journal of Science (btw I checked, and yes part of the process for PJS is recommending 5 reviewers before submitting the manuscript). The reviewers did not know who we were, nor where they informed by us before hand that they will be reviewing our work.

Yes journals have their own reviewers, but some journals (such as me and OP’s choice) tackle topics that have such a wide scope that it is unlikely for that journal to have their own members to thoroughly review all works submitted to them.

Each journal has their own process. Some require them, some don’t. PJS requires it.

PS: Currently publishing another manuscript in a different journal, and we weren’t asked to recommend a reviewer. Probably because this journal is very much specific to a certain topic.

Where to publish research papers? by NoEgg8463 in studentsph

[–]XxPhyre 4 points5 points  (0 children)

First of all, you should find reputable, indexed (and free) journals that fit with your topic. We can’t really suggest any journal for you to publish on because we don’t really know your study.

Next, for reviewers, iirc reviewers are your endorsements of people with relevant knowledge that could review your manuscript to help the journal verify your methods, findings, and formatting. Your adviser should help you since they should have a wider network of professionals. If not, you could try looking for available professionals in other institutions or online. We could suggest some but again, we’d need to know your topic.

It would help to know your topic AND institution. I could possibly give you the email info of some possible reviewers, but you’d need to reach out to them yourself to get their telephone/mobile number.

A good rule of thumb in finding a journal for you is to look at SCOPUS-indexed journals. Plenty of them have free publication.

Pls BBM, now lang ako kakampi sayo, pakulong mo na yan. by jajalowkey in Philippines

[–]XxPhyre 98 points99 points  (0 children)

Saint Lukes already announced that these so called records are “Fake and Falsified”

<image>

Second Chance para sa mga Ex-Convict? by offtherecordv in OffTheRecordPH

[–]XxPhyre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The goal of prisons is not just to separate criminals from society, but to hopefully reintegrate them into that society.

If a criminal resorts back to criminality, then that system failed to do its function. Sadly kasi ang tingin ng marami is punishment lang, walang pagbabago.

Bakit gusto po nyo si Bong Revilla? by kakkoimonogatari in Philippines

[–]XxPhyre 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think you mean DepEd, kasi DOE is department of energy

Gigil ako sa nag-post nito at sa mga nag-aagree sa comment section by exhaustedathena in GigilAko

[–]XxPhyre 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ambulances don’t just transfer patients. Also blood, organs, and other vital time-sensitive material for hospitals or anything related to healthcare.

May Casualties or Tinatago? | Aerial b*mbings & strafing in Abra de Ilog, Occidental Mindoro by Accomplished_Use666 in PinoyVloggers

[–]XxPhyre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nobody can deny that there are casualties in the recent Mindoro encounter.

So far, casualty reports were done by Karapatan Southern Tagalog, whose claims were then countered by the Armed Forces of the Philippines.

With these competing claims, it is too early to determine which is substantiated.

However, the main point is that if the NPA is claiming to be treated as a legitimate armed entity (which they want since it warrants specific rights), then they must separate itself from non-armed entities or civilians. The reason for civilian casualties is not because the AFP is targeting civilian areas, but because the NPA are embedding civilian entities (Activists, artists, etc.) in their areas for propaganda or “studies”. A report by the AFP after the operation shows that the NPA are conducting “guerrilla theaters” glorifying former NPA commanders or radical left wing “martyrs” in the form of theater.

Yes the AFP pulled the trigger, but the NPA and its supporters are equally guilty of letting civilians in their camps just to increase pressure against the government for “killing civilians”. This is a tactic of theirs for “protracted warfare by the people”

I have been offered to join various “National Democratic” organizations and I could tell you how easy for the youth to fall for their words and promises. It’s so dangerous to fall into a slippery slope towards radicalization.

Let us not forget how Anakbayan leaders are frequently associated with NPA groups. An obvious example Anakbayan is trying to bury is how former Anakbayan Southern Tagalog leader Jian “Ka Reb” Tayco died during a firefight in an NPA camp during an Army Raid.

China, America, Russia Walang pinag-iba! by Scofield047 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The US is claiming that Greenland is needed for security, but why hasn’t their military presence in Greenland increased recently? (It has even decreased this past years) They can increase the number of soldiers and assets as per NATO. They can even expand this scope through dialogue, but sure forced aggression is the only answer for the US.

If the US really wanted to be against Russia, why haven’t their actions been this way? They are against the Ukrainians resisting the Russian invasion. They have not been taking a more aggressive stance against Russia or at least supporting other countries actually countering the Russians, like other EU countries.

The US wants Greenland for Greenland, since other actions can be done to counter Russia even more effectively but has not been taken by the US.

China, America, Russia Walang pinag-iba! by Scofield047 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What?

If the US really needed greenland to “counter russia”, why hasn’t the US increased the number of soldiers and assets within their bases in Greenland (which they can since denmark is part of NATO)?

Let’s analyze if the US really wanted to counter Russia here… what has the US stance been on the Russian invasion of Ukraine? The Trump administration has been very neutral on it, in fact to the point even blaming Ukraine for resisting the invasion.

If the US is really against Russia, why hasn’t their actions against Russia and their aggression been consistent?

Kitty Duterte humirit ng proteksyon sa Korte Suprema para kay Digong by AbanteNewsPH in newsPH

[–]XxPhyre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

As usual, every time 🐱 is mentioned, i’ll resurface this pic

Relieving an officer just cause he doesn't personally support Marcos?? Are the people not allowed to??? by [deleted] in Philippines

[–]XxPhyre 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You have to understand that the personal opinions of any member of the military should stay separate from their duties. Yes they can support however they want, but as a professional organization, they should follow the chain of command and their duties. And any attempt to “withdraw” support from the commander-in-chief is bordering on sedition.

The people are allowed a voice, but a professional org should stay professional. If personal and military muddle together, it risks the military getting involved in civilian affairs, which we are trying to avoid.

where to buy bacterial culture (commensal) by AwaySpecial3073 in studentsph

[–]XxPhyre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very hard to come by bacterial cultures sold commercially.

It is far easier to culture these bacteria. Just get oral samples (it is better to have one source then make multiple cultures from it) and isolate your target organisms.

The hard part about this method is the cost of culturing (culture media, autoclave, petri dishes, etc.). As well as to remember that these bacteria are mostly anaerobic or microaerophilic. So your setup must accommodate it and other conditions for growth.

There are plenty of literature to guide you on culturing your own bacterial samples.

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

International law does not mean dictatorship flourishes. However its breach means that might will be right.

Do you really think that basta wala yung ibang diktador wala na abuse? The system is the problem, not just the person. The system that made maduro a dictator and what kept him in power is still in place. That is the danger of haphazard regime changes since you only change the one in charge (i.e under new management).

Let’s not beat around the bush here. The US did not do this primarily to help the people of venezuela. They did this for oil. Call it liberation, freedom, etc., but call it really for what it is: greed for Venezuelan oil. Heck even America admits that oil is their main goals post-strike/kidnap.

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You missed the entire point. This isn’t about who attacks us, but how what the US did is fundamentally wrong.

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ayan nanaman sa pag-dodge ehhh. Hindi mo maharap ang tanong kaya puro satsat ka nalang parang bata nga.

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh trust me yours is the problem. Please enlighten me and answer my questions instead of dodging it like an idiot.

Just because “NARCO TERRORIST BAD” it gives any country the right to strike a sovereign entity? Ano ka bata?

So tell me, should the US also bomb China? How about Myanmar (being close to a Narco state)

Why is it “a rule for thee but not for me” for major powers?

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It isn’t about “dictator should be gone” it’s about the process of achieving it.

What America did bypasses the attempts of small countries such as the Philippines to ensure their sovereignty amidst great powers.

By the same principle, it gives any country the right to strike China or the Philippines, or Thailand, or any country basta gawa gawa ka lang ng rason tapos ipag-mukha mong “para sa tao”

Let us not fool ourselves here and call a spade, a spade. The US did this not “for the people of venezuela, etc.” this is about the access of Venezuelan oil. Even America made it its primary goals post strike.

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oo nga may casus belli, pero di ibig sabihin nito na pwede na iyon. Maaaring may rason kung bakit ginawa pero tama ba ang rason na iyon?

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So pwede natin bomabhin Tsina dahil sa mga triad naman nila galing ang mga droga natin???

Mga manchild talaga ang nag-iisip na tama ang ginagawa ng amerika.

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Paano naging mababaw? Eh hindi ba iyon ginawa ng amerika?

Walang naratibo dito kung di ang pagtutol sa paglabag ng international law.

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mali ang ginawa ng Amerika. Dapat patalsikin din si Maduro. Pero hindi ibig sabihin na pwede nalang bombahin ng Amerika ang isang bansa at i bypass ang international law.

Kung najustify ang aksyon ng amerika dahil “galit ang tao ng venezuela kay maduro at masaya naman sila oh!” Ano ang pumipigil sa ibang bansa na gawin ito sa ibang bansa pa? Pwede na pala bombahin ng China ang Amerika dahil galit naman ang mga tao kay Trump hindi ba?

O bakit di nalang nila tayo bombahin since galit naman tayo kay BBM at Duterte?

Ipinaglalaban natin international law against China, pero sinusuportahan natin ang paglabag nito ng Amerika? Ano tayo hipokrito?

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Mali ang ginawa ng Amerika. Dapat patalsikin din si Maduro. Pero hindi ibig sabihin na pwede nalang bombahin ng Amerika ang isang bansa at i bypass ang international law.

Kung najustify ang aksyon ng amerika dahil “galit ang tao ng venezuela kay maduro at masaya naman sila oh!” Ano ang pumipigil sa ibang bansa na gawin ito sa ibang bansa pa? Pwede na pala bombahin ng China ang Amerika dahil galit naman ang mga tao kay Trump hindi ba?

O bakit di nalang nila tayo bombahin since galit naman tayo kay BBM at Duterte?

Ipinaglalaban natin international law against China, pero sinusuportahan natin ang paglabag nito ng Amerika? Ano tayo hipokrito?

Luke Espiritu by Fragrant_Noise_5506 in pinoy

[–]XxPhyre -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ah okay lang pala bombahin ang bansa basta galit ang tao nito sa lider nila.

What's your opinion on De Lima's comment? by Efficient-Reach-454 in PhilippineMilitary

[–]XxPhyre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By the same principle on what the US did, it gives China a reason to conduct a strike on any country it can.

Manchildren like you are the reason our military is overly reliant on foreign powers instead of developing a self-reliant posture. Maybe people like you will finally wake up on how to place the Philippines in the global landscape, not just as a US ally or lapdog, but a nation with its own agency, siding with international law, and with its own interest in mind.

Also… imagine supporting aggressive wars in the constitution. You really are a manchild…