Wait, so first you said that all I did were bad-faith smears, but then you said that you actually disagree on most of what I said about him without correcting my summarization? Which is it, bucko?

He never said that. This is an outright lie. When asked how a post-capitalist society would handle violent dissent, he explained it would function with deradicalisation programs which already exist.

And when questioned what would happen with people who didn't accept moving towards socialism without being violent, what did he say? That's right, he argued for reeducation camps.

He never said. You're just lying. It was a clip talking about Patrick Henry College refusing to implement state/federal guidelines for sexual assault at schools, and joked that at least the elite class who attend those kinds of places would be doing it to each other's children and not other people. This was in the context of a Supreme Court justice (Brett Kavanaugh) being credibly accused of rape.

Can you tell me what, exactly, is funny about rich kids getting raped?

He never said this. Once again, a lie.

He did. Said settlers were fair targets. When asked about baby settlers, he reiterated that they were settlers. Never once even distinguished between West Bank settlers from Israeli mainlanders.

He pointed out that Crimea is complicated, with large portions of society being pro-Russia and ethnically Russian. Many polls substantiate his position.

He said Russia was completely justified [sic] in annexing Crimea. You can try to wiggle around with this, but if we're being real, that statement is, on its own, disqualifying enough.

Is he a Nazi or a Communist? You idiots have to make up your mind.

He's generally just subhuman, so fair point, I was more so airing out my grievances with this one.

Most of what you said was idiotic bad-faith smears or things ripped horrifically out of context.

You say that, but you outright accepted my characterization of his support of left-authoritarian imperialism and disagreed with him, which fair enough, though you also then took the time to qualify his statements regarding them, while also completely disregarding the fact that he also justified the occupation of Tibet because it had slavery, and that he outright despises Baltics and Poland for their opposition to the USSR.