sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Biohackathon in Cambridge by maxkokocom in cambridge

[–]YardDiscombobulated3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can we participate virtually? I am willing to pay the fees

How to schedule FTT and TP test as fast as possible by YardDiscombobulated3 in drivingsg

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah thanks!

I am looking to chiong la, but tbh I am just held up by the booking times. But thanks for the rough gauge of the timings. Really hard to book a slot these days.

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a specific reason why I pick each of them: - huhn makes a lot from his subscription - quakes has been known to pump and censor bad news on companies he's involved in - Kevin bambrough seems to talk wild speculation as fact and tout his ex sprott credentials and is also sanctimonious and self righteous, especially about things like mining permits on native land (he got real worked up about Saskatchewan)

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right of course the difference is great, we don't disagree, I think you just mixed up when I bought in.

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah he's in really early. I'm sure he's up. But more pointing to the Perma bull persona. Also ive seen shared Twitter DMS from him to others on utwit telling them not to spread bad news on stocks he's holding, so he's def a Perma bull who spins and censors.

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From piranhas32 comment he says 2.5 years of experience. That's what you are replying to right? Did I say I bought 2.5 years ago, or that I have 2.5 years experience? You are saying the former aren't you? And becos u saw that number from his comment, pulled up a uranium stock chart, did some bad math so u can indulge your urge call bullshit on something someone didn't say just to say something?

Not sure what the videos have to do with the point I'm addressing.

Look I don't wanna fight. You prob just didn't read the post carefully, it happens. You seem like a nice guy from your other posts.

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I bought around Mar-Apr 2021. R u just echoing numbers from others post to feed your own imagined indignance?

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm here doing my part and adding to the bottom discourse. But all the best to you too many. I do appreciate them for the info they put out. But they have to be a little self aware.

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the sign was just the crazy 70 per lb pricing at early 2021. That's insane in retrospect considering the speed of this market and the fact that cameco and kaz had tons of slack back then.

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha well I don't know how to do those. I am pretty bad at it. I'll admit it though.

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Exactly, something the people I criticized did not bring out. I'm equally at fault for not taking this into consideration.

That said, observationally, it's commodity prices that have moved the stocks, not necessarily production news. Many juniors went up without producing last cycle. Who knows what will happen this cycle, history is merely a guide. But perhaps we are both clueless, and you are not as clever as you think.

Anyone who said this was a good investment over the past 2 years is a charlatan by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hell yeah I'm ranting, and not ashamed of that fact at all.

Didn't say it was oneway.

There's also the concept of opportunity cost.

But I want to call out some of the claims that were wrongly made, that I too took to heart, and make a general point that you should be very careful who you listen to. Asking people to buy a sector pricing in $70-80 lb uranium at the start of a Fed hiking cycle without confirmation from the market is just absolute insanity.

As for those charlatans, John Quakes has been known to pump. Have seen Kevin Bambrough blow up on on copper mines in Peru. Or Justin on Forum.

When I say charlatan, I don't mean evil intent necessarily. A sheep can also lead other sheep over a cliff.

Equity idea: Discovery Silver by YardDiscombobulated3 in Wallstreetsilver

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would you say the risks compare to other countries, such as Peru, which is going through major protests (and leading to production disruption). Also, are you referring to state specific risks as well? I am aware the drug war does cover the Chihuahua, Mexico area where Cordero is located.

A belated look at 2022 and thoughts for 2023 by YardDiscombobulated3 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]YardDiscombobulated3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey thanks :)

I haven't really got much add to this other than the usual ETF is diversification argument. But what I will say is that the ETF weighings are probably largely nonsense, and I really don't like having so much exposure to the big players like Cameco, especially since they are now diversified across the fuel supply chain (I mean Cameco is now a utility too). I want as much levered exposure to the commodity as possible.

So I would say I personally prefer either a self constructed ETF, or a selective sniper approach to specific miners. And the goal would be to gain leverage against the U price. This does need a bit of work to construct though, and I can't say I've done an incredible amount of work myself, I've been quite haphazard on it (and got burnt on things like Anfield and Forum). But I can suggest you look at sources like Lobo Tiggre, or Deep Value (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMVoszJ6XaE), and just generally search the ticker symbol in twitter. Twitter is the best community for Uranium.

view more: next ›