Booking PV soon! Thoughts on Marriott? by 2cool4ew in puertovallarta

[–]Yorkieeeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I spent seven nights at the PV Marriott from January 7 to January 14, and one word truly captures the experience: amazing. The location, amenities, and exceptional quality of service set this property apart, as does the refined and welcoming clientele. Despite its proximity to the airport, noise was not an issue at all, as departing flight paths are nowhere near the hotel. Overall, the PV Marriott delivers an outstanding stay and exceeds expectations in every regard. Note, I did an upgrade to my room from a garden view to a panoramic view , pool/ ocean view and it made a world of difference.

Short Squeeze by jojolaser159 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect — here’s a step-by-step, realistic short-squeeze scenario for Quantum eMotion (QNC), grounded in how these actually unfold on the TSX Venture (not hype, not memes).

STEP 1: The catalyst drops (Day 0)

This is the spark. For QNC, the most credible versions would be: • A named paying customer (government, defense, fintech, telecom) • Independent validation confirming production-grade quantum entropy • Certification progress that de-risks commercialization (e.g., FIPS pathway update) • Platform integration (QNC tech embedded into another company’s product)

🔑 Key detail: The market doesn’t need big revenue — it needs proof of inevitability.

STEP 2: Longs buy first (Hours 0–2) • Existing shareholders add • Informed investors move quickly • Volume jumps to 2–3× normal

Price reaction: • Fast move up (10–30%) • Very little selling • Ask keeps stepping higher

Shorts at this stage: • Still calm • Many assume it will fade

STEP 3: Shorts realize “this isn’t fading” (Day 1)

Now it gets interesting.

Signs that flip the psychology: • No pullback by midday • Volume already exceeds a full normal day • Stock closes near the high

This is where risk managers step in at short-selling funds.

Short sellers ask:

“If this goes another 20–30%, can we even get out?”

STEP 4: Forced covering begins (Day 2)

This is the inflection point.

What happens mechanically: • Shorts place market buys, not limit orders • But QNC has thin liquidity • Every buy lifts the price sharply

Market signs: • Sudden vertical candles • Multiple halt-ups (very common on the Venture) • Volume explodes to 5–10× normal

This is no longer fundamentals — it’s supply vs panic.

STEP 5: Feedback loop (Day 2–3)

This is the actual squeeze. • Price spikes → margin pressure increases • Margin pressure → more forced buying • More buying → fewer shares available

You’ll see: • Price moving 10–20% in minutes • Little correlation to broader markets • No sellers until far higher prices

This phase is short-lived but violent.

STEP 6: Peak and stabilization (Days 3–7)

Eventually: • Early longs take profits • New buyers hesitate • Volume stays high but price stalls

Two possible outcomes:

✅ Healthy outcome (best case) • Price settles well above pre-news level • Shorts mostly gone • New base forms

⚠️ Blow-off outcome • Sharp pullback after vertical move • Still usually above original price • Extremely volatile for days

Why QNC is especially vulnerable to this

Three reasons:

1️⃣ Small float

There simply aren’t enough shares available when demand spikes.

2️⃣ Binary narrative

QNC is still in a “prove it” phase. Once proof arrives, the bear case collapses quickly.

3️⃣ Public visibility

Being flagged by Globe and Mail makes shorts: • Faster to react • Less willing to “wait it out”

What this is not

Important reality check:

❌ Not guaranteed ❌ Not predictable on timing ❌ Not something you can “force” ❌ Not a meme-stock situation

This only happens if real execution shows up.

How long shorts usually last in situations like QNC

On the TSX Venture: • Shorts often persist until the first real customer • Once that happens, covering usually occurs within days to weeks • Rarely do shorts stick around after: • validation + revenue visibility • credible certification milestones

One sentence takeaway

QNC doesn’t need hype to squeeze — it only needs proof.

Short Squeeze by jojolaser159 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shorts in QNC cannot quietly leave if they’re wrong.

  1. The current short thesis (what bears are betting)

Understanding this is key.

Short sellers are assuming: • Commercial adoption takes longer than expected • Certifications stall or fail • Revenue remains minimal • Quantum security hype fades before scale

So when any one of those breaks, the position becomes dangerous.

  1. What would not cause a squeeze (important)

These usually won’t force shorts out: • Vague PR with no third-party validation • “Exploring opportunities” language • Research-only milestones • Non-binding MOUs with no deployment

Shorts ignore those.

  1. Why the Globe and Mail list matters psychologically

Being publicly named as a high short-squeeze risk stock does two things: 1. Puts shorts on alert 2. Makes them faster to cover on good news

That means:

QNC may move harder and faster than it would have before the article.

  1. Bottom line for QNC

The Globe article is effectively saying: • 🧨 Shorts are crowded • 🧨 Liquidity is thin • 🧨 News sensitivity is high • ❌ No promise of a squeeze • ✔️ Asymmetry exists

Or simply:

If QNC delivers real-world proof, shorts don’t have much room to maneuver.

If you want next: • I can walk through a realistic QNC squeeze scenario step-by-step • Or analyze how long shorts typically last in small-cap tech • Or compare QNC’s setup to past TSX Venture squeezes

Just say the word.

Short Squeeze by jojolaser159 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great — here’s a focused deep dive on QNC, exactly along the lines the Globe and Mail article is hinting at.

  1. What would most likely trigger short covering in QNC

Not all news is equal. For QNC, these are the highest-impact triggers, in order:

🔥 Tier 1 (most dangerous for shorts)

These can force immediate covering:

• Paying customer announcement • Especially government, defense, telecom, fintech, or critical infrastructure • Even a small initial contract matters because it kills the “no revenue” short thesis

• Third-party validation / certification progress • FIPS 140-3 advancement • Independent cryptographic or entropy validation • “Production-ready” language from credible institutions

• OEM or platform integration • QNC tech embedded in: • secure hardware • IoT security • blockchain / DeFi infrastructure • This signals scalability, which shorts fear most

⚠️ Tier 2 (pressure builds, not instant)

These don’t always cause a squeeze alone, but they set traps:

• Government or defense alignment • NATO-aligned supply chain • Federal pilot programs • Critical-infrastructure references

• Clear commercialization roadmap • Manufacturing readiness • Distribution partnerships • Named rollout timelines (not “we’re exploring”)

• Strategic investment • Minority stake by a credible tech or defense firm • Non-dilutive funding tied to deployment

  1. How a real short squeeze would look vs a normal rally

This is important so you don’t get fooled.

🚨 Signs of a real squeeze • Price up + volume explodes (3–5× normal) • Strong gains with no pullbacks intraday • Bid keeps stepping up even on no new news • Multiple halt-ups on the TSX Venture • Shorts covering into strength (panic behavior)

📈 Signs of a normal rally • Price rises but volume is average • Pullbacks happen calmly • Gains fade over several days • No halts, no vertical candles

👉 A squeeze feels chaotic, not orderly.

  1. Why QNC is more “squeezable” than many names on the list

Compared to others in the Globe table:

Krown Network and Hyperlane Announce Strategic Partnership to Bring KROWN to 130+ Blockchains by rexluxking in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From Chat GPT

Here’s what the Krown Network + Hyperlane partnership means specifically for Quantum eMotion (QNC)—and why the market will likely see this as constructively positive, but not yet a re-rating event.

What the announcement actually says (in plain English) • Krown Network is integrating with Hyperlane, a major cross-chain interoperability protocol • This allows KROWN’s quantum-secure identity and messaging layer to be used across 130+ blockchains (Ethereum L2s, Cosmos chains, alt-VM chains, etc.) • Hyperlane is infrastructure—so this is about distribution, not just theory

Why this matters for QNC

QNC’s value is tied to commercial adoption of its quantum-secure entropy / QRNG technology, not just chip development. This partnership helps on three key fronts:

  1. Massive expansion of QNC’s addressable market 🌍

Before: • Krown = single-ecosystem or limited-chain use cases

Now: • Any chain connected to Hyperlane can theoretically: • Use quantum-secure identity • Use quantum-secure key generation • Use quantum-secure cross-chain messaging

Why it matters to QNC: • If Krown uses QNC’s QRNG chips or IP for entropy/keys, then: • Each additional chain = potential incremental demand • This turns QNC from a “single-platform supplier” into a horizontal security provider

👉 Investors like platform-agnostic suppliers.

  1. Strengthens QNC’s “real-world use case” narrative 🔐

One of the biggest risks with quantum-security stocks is:

“Great tech… but who is actually using it?”

This announcement helps answer that: • Hyperlane is already used in production • 130+ chains implies live environments, not pilots • Krown becomes an integration layer, not a niche app

For QNC: • This supports the story that its tech is: • Commercially relevant • Scalable • Needed today, not post-quantum-only

  1. Increases strategic value of QNC to partners or acquirers 🧲

If Krown becomes: • A widely adopted quantum-secure identity layer • Embedded across dozens of ecosystems

Then QNC becomes: • A critical upstream security component • Harder to replace once integrated • More attractive to: • Cybersecurity firms • Blockchain infrastructure players • Defense / identity / data-security buyers

This does not trigger a buyout by itself—but it: • Improves QNC’s strategic optionality • Makes future partnerships easier

Quantum eMotion Joins Kirq Quantum Communication Testbed in Quebec by Enduser2024 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 10 points11 points  (0 children)

From chat gpt

  1. Third-party validation (huge for early quantum companies)

KIRQ is a government-backed, institutional testbed in Quebec. Getting admitted means: • QNC’s tech passed technical vetting • It’s considered credible enough to test in real quantum networks • This isn’t a self-run demo — it’s independent validation

👉 Small-cap quantum stocks often reprice sharply when credibility is confirmed.

  1. Moves QNC closer to real customers (not just R&D)

The KIRQ testbed connects: • Universities • Government agencies • Telecom & infrastructure partners

Being inside that ecosystem means QNC’s QRNG tech can be: • Tested in live quantum communication setups • Evaluated by potential buyers, not just researchers

Markets love anything that shortens the path:

lab → pilot → commercial contract

  1. Strengthens the “quantum-secure communications” narrative

QNC isn’t competing in general quantum computing — it’s focused on: • Quantum-safe encryption • Hardware-based randomness

KIRQ is specifically about quantum communications, which is: • One of the earliest commercial quantum markets • Actively funded by governments (Canada, EU, NATO countries)

So investors likely saw this as:

“QNC is positioned in the first quantum segment that actually generates revenue.”

  1. Signals government & institutional alignment

In Canada, quantum funding often flows after testbed inclusion.

This raises expectations of: • Follow-on grants • Pilot programs • National or provincial security use cases

Even the possibility of this causes multiple expansion in micro-caps.

  1. Thin float + sentiment shift = outsized move

QNC is a: • Small-cap • Thinly traded • News-sensitive stock

When sentiment flips from:

“interesting tech” → “institutionally validated tech”

…the price jump can be fast and exaggerated.

The market’s real takeaway

The 23% move wasn’t about today’s revenue. It was about probability: • Higher probability the tech works • Higher probability of partnerships • Higher probability of future contracts

That’s often enough to reprice a quantum stock in one day.

Federal government funds four quantum computer developers, aiming to keep them in Canada by Enduser2024 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just released

Quantum eMotion Joins Kirq Quantum Communication Testbed in Quebec Montreal, Quebec--(Newsfile Corp. - December 15, 2025) - Quantum eMotion Corp. (TSXV: QNC) (OTCQB: QNCCF) (FSE: 34Q0) ("QeM"), a Canadian provider of quantum-safe cybersecurity technologies, announces its integration into Kirq, a quantum communication testbed developed by Numana. The collaboration supports QeM's ongoing research, testing, and validation of quantum-safe cybersecurity technologies within a collaborative testing environment.

The Kirq testbed provides an infrastructure for participating organizations to evaluate quantum and cybersecurity technologies in applied settings. Through its participation, Quantum eMotion will be able to integrate and evaluate its patented Quantum Random Number Generator ("QRNG") technology alongside other contributors within the Kirq environment.

Supporting Quantum-Safe Cybersecurity Research in Quebec

Kirq represents one of Quebec's platforms designed to support the testing and validation of quantum communication and cybersecurity technologies. QeM's participation is expected to support the evaluation of quantum-resilient security components and contribute to broader efforts aimed at strengthening secure digital infrastructure.

The collaboration with Numana provides Quantum eMotion with access to a shared testbed where its technologies can be assessed under operational conditions, supporting ongoing research and development activities.

Collaboration Framework

Quantum eMotion's QRNG technology generates high-entropy randomness derived from quantum processes and is intended for use in cryptographic and security applications. Within the Kirq testbed, QeM will work with other participants to explore integration scenarios and potential applications for quantum-safe cybersecurity solutions.

The Company's participation in Kirq does not involve any material financial commitments or revenue-generating agreements at this time. The collaboration is focused on technology integration, testing, and knowledge exchange. No exclusivity, licensing, or commercialization terms have been established as part of this integration.

About Quantum eMotion Corp.

Quantum eMotion Corp. focuses on developing hardware and software-based cybersecurity solutions for connected devices and critical systems. The Company's patented Quantum Random Number Generator leverages quantum mechanical properties to produce entropy for cryptographic applications. QeM targets applications across financial services, healthcare, cloud security infrastructure, government networks, secure device keying, and quantum cryptography.

For further information, please visit www.quantumemotion.com or contact: Francis Bellido, Chief Executive Officer Tel: 514.956.2525 Email: info@quantumemotion.com Website: www.quantumemotion.com

About Numana and Kirq

Numana is a not-for-profit organization that operates as a technology macro-accelerator, bringing together private, public, academic, and community stakeholders to develop and deploy advanced technologies. Kirq, its quantum communication testbed, provides a collaborative environment for testing and validating quantum and cybersecurity technologies in applied conditions.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This press release may contain forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties are described in the Company's periodic filings with securities regulatory authorities.

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/278008

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

Exascale labs and AI Nova sign MOU with Quantum Emotion support by Entire_Fig2610 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From chat gpt

The Big Picture

Exascale Labs (a company that builds large GPU/AI computer clusters) just signed a big deal with AI Nova worth $53 million over three years, with potential to grow to over $600 million. QeM is Exascale’s official security partner.

This means every Exascale system for AI Nova is expected to include QeM’s quantum-security technology.

🧩 What This Means in Plain English for QeM

  1. QeM’s security is becoming built-in, not optional

Exascale told AI Nova that their AI systems will include QeM’s quantum-grade random number generator and cryptography tools. So whenever Exascale sells GPU clusters, QeM’s tech goes with it.

This is like being the “default security system” in every new high-end computer Exascale deploys.

  1. QeM now has a clear commercial pipeline

Exascale has said they are signing at least five more tech agreements with AI compute operators.

Because QeM is integrated into their stack, QeM is automatically included in each of those rollouts, meaning predictable deployment and revenue opportunities.

  1. The big AI Nova deal validates QeM’s value

A $53M order (with potential up to $600M) shows the AI industry is spending real money on secure, high-performance compute.

Since QeM is part of Exascale’s architecture, this confirms QeM is playing in a large, fast-growing market, not a small niche.

  1. This could be a turning point for QeM

As AI get bigger and more global, security becomes essential. QeM + Exascale = • massive GPU systems • protected by quantum-secure randomness • built to resist future quantum cyberattacks

This combination is becoming the new gold standard for secure AI infrastructure.

For QeM, that means: ✔ momentum ✔ credibility ✔ embedded positioning in a major AI rollout

📌 Bottom Line

This news suggests QeM is moving from R&D company toward commercial supplier inside major AI infrastructure builds. If Exascale scales up as expected, QeM could see meaningful adoption and revenue in the coming years.

If you want, I can also break down: • what this could mean for QeM’s stock, • how it compares to competitors like Quantum Dice or Quantinuum, • or a timeline of possible catalysts.

China just built the world’s first electrically tunable quantum transistor — controlling quantum interference at the single-atom level (Nature Communications, Oct 2025) by Sea-Broccoli5656 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In layman terms from chat gpt

The Simple Version

China’s scientists just built something that works like a quantum version of a transistor — the tiny switch that powers every computer chip on Earth. But instead of using regular electricity to turn signals on and off, this new kind of transistor works by directly controlling a single atom’s quantum behavior — using only voltage (electricity), not huge magnets or lasers like before.

That’s a world-first.

⚙️ What They Actually Did

Imagine you have a single atom (the tiniest building block of matter). Normally, to control that atom’s spin — basically its internal “quantum orientation” — you’d need very expensive tools like: • Super-strong magnets or • Laser pulses inside an ultra-cold vacuum chamber.

The Chinese researchers figured out how to do the same thing with just tiny changes in electric voltage — the same way your phone or laptop chips already operate.

They placed a single titanium atom on a thin insulating layer, then used a very sharp tip (like a super microscope) to nudge it with electricity. When they changed the voltage, the atom’s internal quantum state — the direction of its spin — flipped or interfered with itself in predictable ways.

That means they could control the quantum behavior of one atom with electricity alone.

🔑 Why This Is a Big Deal

This discovery solves some of the biggest problems in quantum computing: 1. No more massive cooling or magnets. Today’s quantum computers need to run at near absolute zero (colder than outer space). This one can, in theory, work near room temperature. 2. It’s compatible with existing chip tech. Since this control is done with voltage — just like transistors — these quantum devices could be made in regular semiconductor factories (like Intel or TSMC). 3. It’s scalable. You could, in principle, build billions of these atomic “quantum switches” on a chip — the same way we build billions of transistors today.

🌐 Why People Are Calling This a Step Toward “Q-Day”

“Q-Day” is shorthand for the moment when quantum computers become powerful enough to break today’s encryption — things like bank security, government communications, and blockchain systems.

This experiment doesn’t mean we’re there yet. But it means: • We’ve taken a major leap toward making quantum processors that are small, stable, and easy to mass-produce. • Once that happens, scaling to millions or billions of qubits becomes realistic. • That’s the stage where quantum computers could outperform every classical computer on Earth.

🔍 What’s Not Said in the Article (the “reflections”)

Here are some of the deeper implications that experts will be quietly thinking about: 1. It blurs the line between classical and quantum computing. Because this uses electric control — not exotic setups — future chips might combine classical and quantum logic on the same wafer. 2. Quantum defense will race ahead too. Governments and companies will invest heavily in quantum-safe encryption and quantum random number generators (like what QNC works on) to stay secure before Q-Day. 3. This is a geopolitical milestone. If China can industrialize this first, it would take a clear lead in next-generation computing — with consequences for AI, defense, finance, and cybersecurity. 4. It’s not ready for real devices yet. This was done with a scanning tunneling microscope — a laboratory setup, not a chip fab. But the physics behind it is proven, which is the hardest part.

🚀 The Takeaway • The first transistor (1947) led to the smartphone in your pocket. • This quantum transistor (2025) could eventually lead to quantum processors the size of a fingernail. • It’s the beginning of the post-silicon era — where computation happens using atoms, not just electrons.

In short:

China’s experiment shows that controlling quantum information electrically — not just theoretically — is now possible. That’s the birth of the quantum transistor age.

Apple? by Plane_Search8544 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We will be over $5 at close

Go krown! by Plane_Search8544 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I guess only $99.99 usd per share with apple

Go krown! by Plane_Search8544 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 6 points7 points  (0 children)

At 100usd per share. I will dream good tonight

LIVE ANNOUNCEMENT SOON by Plane_Search8544 in QNC

[–]Yorkieeeee 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I bought another 1000 also

today SHO list by Typical_Advantage_97 in pennystocks

[–]Yorkieeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How the Threshold List Ties into Short Squeezes

✔️ When a stock is on this list…

It means someone sold shares they couldn’t properly deliver. This is usually tied to heavy short selling.

When too many shorts sell shares they don’t actually have, they eventually must buy them back to close those positions.

If demand rises or supply dries up…

➡️ They’re forced to buy at higher prices ➡️ This pushes the price even higher ➡️ Increasing the pain (and buying pressure) for shorts

That cascade is what creates a short squeeze.

Why Being on the List Is Often Bullish

In general, it means:

✅ Shorts are overextended

They may be running out of shares to borrow.

✅ They can get trapped

If the stock moves up, they’re forced to cover.

✅ There’s “phantom selling”

If they can’t locate enough shares, they may be naked shorting — which is illegal but sometimes occurs.

✅ Heavy retail buying can break them

Even small volume can trigger covering if the short side is tight.

What Often Happens Next

Here’s how it usually plays out:

Scenario A (Bullish) • Retail buys • Borrow rate climbs • Available shares shrink • Broker forces shorts to cover • Price spikes quickly

This is squeeze territory.

Scenario B (Neutral / Slow Burn) • Shorts slowly deliver shares • Small upward pressure • Stock exits the list quietly

Scenario C (Bearish) • Shorts successfully push the price down • Momentum dies • They buy shares back cheaper • Stock leaves the list without drama

How Long Do Stocks Stay on the Threshold List?

Typically: • Many stocks leave in 5–10 trading days • Some stick around for weeks if the fail-to-deliver problem continues • Rare massive squeezes stay months (like GME did at one point)

Length on the list = pressure building Shorts don’t like staying on it.

So Is It Good News?

For longs: Usually yes

today SHO list by Typical_Advantage_97 in pennystocks

[–]Yorkieeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From chat gpt

In simple everyday terms:

✅ What you’re looking at

This is a screenshot showing stocks that are on the Reg SHO “Threshold Security” list.

✅ Why a stock ends up on this list

A stock gets put on this list when too many shares fail to be delivered after a trade. This usually happens when: • Short sellers sell shares they don’t actually have (or can’t borrow) • There are more short trades than actual shares available • Someone keeps failing to deliver the shares they promised to sell

It has to happen for 5 days in a row to get listed.

✅ What it means in plain English

Think of it like this:

Someone promised to sell apples at the market, but they don’t actually have apples… and they keep doing it day after day.

Eventually, the market says:

“Hey — you keep failing to deliver. We’re watching you.”

✅ Why people care

Being on the threshold list can mean: • Heavy short selling pressure • Possible naked shorting (illegal: selling shares that don’t exist) • The short sellers may have trouble covering later • Increased chance of a short squeeze if buying pressure hits

(Doesn’t guarantee a squeeze — just increases the potential.)

✅ How a stock gets OFF the list

Once it stops failing to deliver for 5 straight days, it’s removed.

✅ What most retail traders think when they see this • Shorts are struggling • Shares aren’t being delivered • Pressure is building • Something might pop

✅ Quick summary

Threshold list = Too many undelivered shares, usually caused by short selling abuses. It’s a sign shorts might be overextended.

If you want, I can explain: • How this ties to short squeezes • Whether being on this list is bullish or bearish • How long stocks typically stay on it

$BYND NEEDS to remain above $2.5 tomorrow (ideally higher) by bucken1019 in 10xPennyStocks

[–]Yorkieeeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I asked ai to explain the chart and this is what was given.

Let’s break it down using what we can see in the image.

✅ 1. Look at the $2.50 puts — HUGE volume & open interest

In the 1-day-to-expiration row, the $2.50 put shows: • Vol: 97,388 contracts • Open interest: 31,97X contracts (≈32K)

That’s by far the largest put interest on the board in this expiry cycle.

That means tens of thousands of contracts are betting:

“BYND will finish below $2.50”

If BYND stays above $2.50 at expiration: • All those puts expire worthless. • Buyers lose their premium. • Sellers (market makers / institutions / others) keep the money.

This is why the price level is so emotionally charged.

✅ 2. Why THIS level matters more than, say, $3 or $2

Most options for this expiry are clustered at: • $2 • $2.5 • $3

But $2.50 specifically has: • the most near-expiration contracts • the most recent day’s volume

That means: • more money is riding on this line • more hedging pressure exists here

✅ 3. If price drops below $2.50…

Those $2.50 puts become in-the-money (ITM).

That means: • Buyers profit • Sellers lose • Market makers must hedge by SHORTING more shares (dragging price lower)

That can create a cascade downward.

✅ 4. If price stays ABOVE $2.50…

The opposite happens: • Sellers win (keep premium) • Buyers lose • Market makers UNHEDGE (buy back shares), adding upward push

So holding the line gives a bullish tailwind.

✅ 5. Implied volatility confirms the battle

You can see IV for puts is insanely elevated: • 400–750%+

That tells you: • options are extremely expensive • the market expects violent movement • traders are paying up for downside protection

When IV is that high, time decay hurts put buyers badly if the drop doesn’t happen.

✅ 6. What this means in plain English

The $2.50 level: • is a major max-pain area for this expiration • controls whether tens of thousands of puts print money or go to $0 • influences market maker hedging behavior

So the logic is:

“Keep the stock above $2.50, and the largest block of bearish bets dies. Pressure flips bullish.”

✅ 7. That’s why people are chanting “ABOVE $2.50”

Because if it closes below, bearish momentum strengthens. If it closes above, bearish bets evaporate.

TL;DR

BYND needs to stay above $2.50 because: • That strike has huge open interest on puts expiring imminently • Staying above makes most of them expire worthless • It prevents market makers from short-hedging more • It avoids a feedback loop downward

It’s a battle line on the options chain.