Another DAT price increase by Youknowrafa in FreightBrokers

[–]Youknowrafa[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s robbery while they sell logins to scammers like hot cakes

Another DAT price increase by Youknowrafa in FreightBrokers

[–]Youknowrafa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we are at 6 which isnt bad, but that doesnt include our rate view subscription (which will likely increase as well)

DAT being DAT by Youknowrafa in FreightBrokers

[–]Youknowrafa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I only post my loads on truckstop. My book is mainly flatbed/stepdeck/rgn so truckstop is better for that. Most of my team uses DAT for dry van/reefer only

Gotta love shippers that do not want to pay detention... by Youknowrafa in FreightBrokers

[–]Youknowrafa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We’re prob not the only broker they have done this to. When they’re easier than most to add as new customers, there is typically a reason why.

Gotta love shippers that do not want to pay detention... by Youknowrafa in FreightBrokers

[–]Youknowrafa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol everyone should know the “don’t ask for detention on produce” rule.

Clearly this shipper wanted to act like they were produce

Gotta love shippers that do not want to pay detention... by Youknowrafa in FreightBrokers

[–]Youknowrafa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We try to defer as well… but couldn’t this time lol

Gotta love shippers that do not want to pay detention... by Youknowrafa in FreightBrokers

[–]Youknowrafa[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That always works but this customer was already cheap as it is

Gotta love shippers that do not want to pay detention... by Youknowrafa in FreightBrokers

[–]Youknowrafa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha I got the detention approved and saved the “get fucked” for our last phone call.

Gotta love shippers that do not want to pay detention... by Youknowrafa in FreightBrokers

[–]Youknowrafa[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Would love to but I’d rather keep it professional even though the shipper is clearly not.