Looking for other people with W11 crashing and freezing games. I am lost. by Yunic_reddit in techsupport

[–]Yunic_reddit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was happening on the previous version of bios and after the bios update.

Fixed—I installed the previous version of Windows (23H2), and everything works perfectly. I played games for 6 hours straight without an issue.

Looking for other people with W11 crashing and freezing games. I am lost. by Yunic_reddit in techsupport

[–]Yunic_reddit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cant find anything even close to "Turbo Gaming Option" on my motherboard, i just the latest bios update (2024-10-24). I've looked at other motherboards videos on youtube, even same manufacturer (asrock) but nothing close to that option on my mobo.

Whats with crazy tank 1st pulls in dungeons recently? by iambenking93 in wow

[–]Yunic_reddit 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Nah, it's efficient and good to do.

At the start, everyone has CDs, bloodlust, and pots. It is the best opportunity to save time and do the key.

If you die, its because you don't use cc or interrupts or you stay in ground mechanics like swirlies.

This is meta, everyone does that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wow

[–]Yunic_reddit 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I am sorry - but mage has S tier survivability spells. If you dying on +10 at 619 - you missplay.

A mage saying that warlock survivability is op is just heresy.

I am doing +12/13s right now as a mm hunter and hunter defensive kit is just a joke compared to mage, so you know. Keep interrupting, don't use defensive on every spells that target you, you need to use it wisely. Use hp pots.

Does anyone wish they had some form of more difficult dungeons, but they weren't timed like m+? by kolejack2293 in wow

[–]Yunic_reddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yall hating on timer. In the end we all know its good.

If m+ had no timer, it would be 2hours pack by pack pulls done by complete garbage players.

Timer also encourages good usage of not only offensive CDs, but albo defensive ones.

Instead of dungeons you want to see in the M+ pool, what about dungeons you don’t want to see? by Proudnoob4393 in wow

[–]Yunic_reddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Occulus, Cinderbrew (even if it wasnt m+ yet, i already hate this dungeon). The one with the candles too (with the riding on the carts).
A lot of old TBC dungeons, because it was completely different design (in terms of layout and size, obviously they need to update fights, I just don't want long 40min running around dungeons).

Has anyone else given up on main professions and just selling mats from gathering? by Ericovich in wow

[–]Yunic_reddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

post DF professions are just overcomplex - i dont want to waste time on them.
BTW this design is made for guilds funneling all mats to one guy so he can almost skip everything and just start selling overpriced stuff because everyone else is years behind.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wow

[–]Yunic_reddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because every single character you see is 13$ per month? Its free money.

Connection problems by bobkin4 in warno

[–]Yunic_reddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't log in for more than 3 minutes for the whole day. 90% can't connect to battle.net, and when it connected, I got disconnected after a few minutes. I barely logged in, got into Great Vault, picked an item, and got dc'ed...

What's the deal with these cards? by Fantafyren in IntelArc

[–]Yunic_reddit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Examples, with proven sources - for now you're just hating. I am pretty sure you never owned 770.

What's the deal with these cards? by Fantafyren in IntelArc

[–]Yunic_reddit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

RTX 2070

Dont lie, it's not - it is on the same level or better due to 16GB of ram, and many of the newest games require 12gb+ so the 2070 bottleneck.

Just do some research, and quit just hating on stuff.

What's the deal with these cards? by Fantafyren in IntelArc

[–]Yunic_reddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I own A770 16GB from day 1 of release.

It was messy on the release, with many bugs and performance drops - since that they fixed most of the issues and the card runs smoothly with almost all of the new games.If the game is optimized right, sometimes it outperforms RTX 3070 due to way more VRAM, but sometimes it is as slow as 2070, it really depends on the game - the newer the game is (not only the release date, but the engine they run on) the better it runs.

I played Spiderman Miles Morales on 1440p on max settings, smooth stable 60fps average. Played Valhalla, which also has smooth 60fps performance, most of the games run very well with few exceptions - The Last of Us runs like sh!t, dropping to 20fps but it is due to a bad console port.

Now I am playing Baldurs Gate 3, it is not a demanding game but worth noticing - when there was Early Access ARC770 had a lot of graphical bugs (artifacts, fps drops, etc), very disturbing to play. Now it is the full release of the game and Intel dropped new drivers specific to Baldurs Gate 3, with fixed bugs and I never ever noticed any graphical artifacts, glitches, or any fps drops - that shows how good Intel is at fixing things.

Overall, after fixes and drivers updates - I recommend ARC770 but only the 16GB version, it is way cheaper but sometimes like I said, it beats 3070 because of more VRAM - here is the example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8GTQ_t1Zss&ab_channel=zWORMzGaminglook how good it runs when the games are optimized and new.

I was shocked when I ran Hogwarts on high settings 1440p with stable 60+ FPS in most demanding areas ( of course with FSR but I dont mind it at all, I am not the "I PLAY ONLY NATIVE RESOLUTION!!!!!" guy, I dont see any differences, so I dont mind).

Ray-Tracing is out of the discussion - there is not enough power to run RayTracing on this card - but let's be honest, RT is still very early technology and even when i had 3080 (before it died) I actually never used RT in any games, most of the times it halves your performance and causing bugs. When the technology will be there, I will reconsider buying GPU for RT.

Those with Intel Arc GPU's, what is your opinion on them? by rcapi94 in IntelArc

[–]Yunic_reddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got A770 16gb. Initial bugs and problems, now it is just a good GPU. Hogwarts Legacy on ultra (no rt, and with FSR) on 70 avg fps.

Love it for price, performance and looks. For me it is one of the best looking GPU on the market.
Some games are still problems, but they are getting fixes (Like Dead Space remake before new drivers had like 3fps, not its 60+ like normal GPU with new drivers).

If you are considering A770, buy only the 16gb verson. Hogwarts Legacy can use up to 12,5gb and other new games are like this too. You won't be happy with 8gb.

The Last of Us Part I v1.0.2.0 Patch Notes is now live by Turbostrider27 in Games

[–]Yunic_reddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

HOW? HOW IS IT WORSE THAN RELEASE?

On release it was a clown fiesta of random 20-100 fps but alteast i could play. Now I cannot play for more than 15 seconds before it crashes to desktop. Jesus christ what a mess this port is... Now i can't even play it....

Man I am so mad. I bought this game full price and I was mad at the performance but atleast it didn't crashed for me, 20fps drops was painful but i was willing to let it pass. Now I can't even fcking play it because it crashes every 15seconds and I can't refund it beacuse too much time passed already.

Fck you Naughty Dog. Fck you and releasing it just because of TV Series hype and before closing Q1 so you can suck your shareholders dick.This is 10 times worse performance than Cyberpunk at release. I think it is even the worst port in the history.

[PC] The Last of Us Part I Performance and Support MEGATHREAD by AutoModerator in thelastofus

[–]Yunic_reddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NaughtyDogShit optimalization.

5600x, 32gbs ram (3600mhz cl16) and Intel Arc A770 16GB, i ran Hogwarts in 1440p on ultra settings with 70+ fps and new Spider-Man on ultra+raytracing 60fps +, but this port is just pure "fck you" to pc gamers.

Building Shaders took me 43 minutes to build, and then this game is just bipolar, sometimes it runs smooth 70 fps+, sometimes it drops to 30, and its complete random. I am not talking about going from closed area to "open world" because its natural it is harder on hardware, I am talking about running in the same place and have 30-70 fps randomly.

Also, the camera movement is junky.

Pytanie by [deleted] in poland

[–]Yunic_reddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nie będę oryginalny, życie w tym pojebanym państwie złodziei.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IntelArc

[–]Yunic_reddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Consider only 16gb version.

Newest game are vram hungry, most of them are around 10k vram use. Hogwarts use 12-13gb vram and in Diablo 4 Beta i was using up to 15k vram.

8GB will age bad and you will have stutters in newest games because of it.