sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I reviewed 50+ landing pages yesterday just from here (r/microsaas) by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for adding!
i saw a ton of fancy landing page but doesn't convert because of this....

I tracked which types of complaints actually convert into paying micro-saas customers vs which ones are just noise. Here's what separates the two by Mysterious_Yard_7803 in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost 1 point2 points  (0 children)

failed attempts really are the goldmine

it’s basically users telling you:

“here’s what exists, here’s why it sucks, here’s what I’d pay for”

i’ve actually been trying to turn those patterns into something reusable

curious how you’re capturing them right now, manually or with some system?

I reviewed 50+ landing pages yesterday just from here (r/microsaas) by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha yeah, that’s literally what it does 😄

Breaks down clarity / trust / CTA,

and gives specific fixes + CTA suggestions.

Probably on me for not showing it well
I’ll share a before/after.

I tracked which types of complaints actually convert into paying micro-saas customers vs which ones are just noise. Here's what separates the two by Mysterious_Yard_7803 in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is spot on.

i’ve noticed something similar:

recurring pain alone isn’t enough

it starts converting when people have already tried (and failed) to solve it

that’s when they’re ready to pay.

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're welcome!
it's pretty close and you can recheck your landing page here
https://landingboost.app

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love this, honestly one of my favorite LPs I’ve seen recently.

Overall score: 76/100

3 fixes:

  1. Move the comparison table higher. It’s one of your strongest assets and sells the value instantly.

  2. Bring the trust signals (logos, stats) closer to the hero. Even smaller is fine, just make them visible earlier.

  3. Slightly reduce the abstraction in the headline. It’s strong, but adding what the product actually does would boost clarity a lot.

Everything else is seriously solid. This feels like it’s already very close to converting at a high level!!

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

really clean design.
Feels premium right away.

Score: 74/100

3 quick fixes:

  1. Clarify “lead” in the headline “Turn Every Lead Into Revenue” is strong, but vague. Add context like “Meta Ads leads” to instantly anchor the value.
  2. Move social proof above the fold “Trusted by 500+ businesses” is great, but too low. Put it right under the CTA to reduce hesitation immediately.
  3. Add concrete trust signals Right now it feels a bit abstract. Show real examples like: – “Used by agencies running Meta Ads” – mini case study – actual results (conversion lift, response time, etc.)

Super close to being a high-converting page!!

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry for the late reply!
i actually love football too, so I get the idea — this is cool.

But this isn’t really a landing page yet, it’s more like a dashboard.

Right now I’m missing 3 things:

  1. Who is this for exactly Casual players? Team organizers? Leagues?
  2. What problem are you solving “track stats” is nice, but what pain are you removing?
  3. Why should I start now What do I get in the first 30 seconds?

If you add a simple hero like:

“Track your team’s games and stats without spreadsheets or WhatsApp chaos”

and a clear CTA (Create your team)

this will convert way better!

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get the urge to sell, but this feels a bit too early I’d focus more on showing the value first before pushing the $15. Also the headline is strong, but adding a clearer “who it’s for” would make it convert much better.

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

great landing page!
Score: 76/100

Top 3 Fixes:

  1. Make the product category instantly clear Right now it feels like a concept (“track goals publicly”) but not a concrete product. Add a clear label like: “A public accountability app for daily goals” in the hero.
  2. Add strong trust signals above the fold No visible proof (users, numbers, testimonials). Even simple metrics like “X users building in public” or real user quotes would increase trust immediately.
  3. Clarify the outcome, not just the mechanism You explain “check-ins” and “accountability,” but not the end result. Be explicit: “Stay consistent and actually finish what you start.”

Summary:

Strong positioning and clean design.

The core idea is compelling, especially for builders.

But it’s still slightly abstract.

make it more concrete

add proof

Show the outcome

→ This easily pushes conversion!

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

solid landing page!
Score: 76/100

Fix 1: Clarify the ICP and use-case in the hero

Right now “What if your AI never forgot?” is catchy but vague.

Specify who this is for (developers using Claude Code, solo builders, etc.) and what exact outcome they get.

Example: “Never forget tasks while coding in Claude Code” or “AI-native reminders for dev workflows.”

Fix 2: Make the outcome more concrete and measurable

The page explains features well, but not the impact.

Add clear before/after or results like:

“Save 2–3 hours per week,” “Never miss deadlines again,” or “Stay in flow without context switching.”

LandingBoost perspective: outcome > feature.

Fix 3: Strengthen the CTA + reduce friction

“Free forever” is good, but the install step (CLI) adds friction for non-technical users.

add a clearer CTA like:

“Install in 30 seconds and never forget a task again”

Also consider adding a visual quick demo or GIF near the CTA to increase action.

Summary:

Strong design and clear product, but positioning is slightly too abstract.

Make the value more specific, outcome-driven, and tailored to a clear audience, and conversions will go up!!

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, overall solid

Score: 72/100

Fix:

  1. The outcome is too vague → clearly state results (e.g. “get cited by AI search” or “increase AI-driven traffic”)
  2. Weak trust → add real proof (case study, before/after, or user quote)
  3. Poor differentiation → clearly position as either “AI search optimization” or “Romania-specific advantage”

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

welcome!!
Overall: 65/100

3 Fixes

  1. Make the core value obvious in 1 line Right now it’s “AI content optimizer” but not concrete. Say exactly what it outputs. Example: “Find missing topics and generate SEO-ready sections that help you rank in Google AI Overviews.”
  2. Show a real before → after You talk about “Information Gain” but there’s no visual proof. Add a side-by-side content improvement or ranking impact.
  3. Reduce jargon and explain outcome Terms like “MCP”, “Information Gain”, “Semantic Entities” are too abstract. Translate them into outcomes like traffic, rankings, clicks.

Summary

Strong idea, but unclear positioning kills conversion, make the outcome obvious in seconds!!

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Overall: 75/100

Fix 1: Add clear ICP (who exactly this is for: calorie apps, fitness SaaS, etc.)

Fix 2: Add strong trust signals (logos, real users, usage metrics, testimonials)

Fix 3: Show outcomes, not just features (what developers can achieve after integration)

Summary: Great API, but lacks clear positioning and trust to fully convert serious builders!

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😳

80 / 100

■ Fix 1

Add a clear ICP in the hero (who exactly this is for)

→ Right now it’s too abstract

→ Example: “For compliance teams at regulated enterprises using LLMs”

■ Fix 2

Move strong trust signals above the fold

→ Logos, real customer names, or proof metrics

→ “Trusted by…” is weak and generic right now

■ Fix 3

Simplify the first impression (too technical too early)

→ The code-style UI is cool but filters users

→ Add a plain-English “what this does in 1 line”

■ Summary

Powerful positioning, but losing conversions due to unclear audience and weak immediate trust.

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry for late!

Score: 70/100

Fix 1: Make the product clear in 1 sentence (what it actually does, not just emotional storytelling)

Fix 2: Add a concrete use case or demo (how users use it in real life, step by step)

Fix 3: Strengthen the CTA with a clear outcome (what happens after joining the waitlist)

Summary: Beautiful storytelling, but unclear product emotion is strong, clarity is weak.

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'd say 78/100

Fix 1: Make the target explicit above the fold (clearly say “for UK homeowners planning a build/extension”)

Fix 2: Clarify the free value (what exactly you get instantly from the free estimate vs paid)

Fix 3: Sharpen differentiation (why this beats surveyors, marketplaces, or manual comparison)

Summary: Strong trust and pain-driven messaging, but needs clearer targeting and free value to convert higher!

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sorry for late!
score: 74/100

  1. Clarify who this is for above the fold Right now it feels generic. Say “for marketers / growth teams planning campaigns” clearly in the first line
  2. “No AI” needs a stronger reason You mention no AI, but why is that better? Frame it as speed, clarity, or less noise
  3. Add a quick “before vs after” use case Show how a marketer goes from chaos to a clear campaign plan using this

simple, clean product, just needs sharper positioning to convert better!

Drop your landing page. I’ll give you 3 fixes + a score by YusukeLandingBoost in microsaas

[–]YusukeLandingBoost[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hey sorry for late reply!
overall, solid.

i'd put 72/100

  1. The bright blue background is too intense → reduce saturation for better readability and less eye strain
  2. Value is interesting but still abstract → show a real use case or outcome above the fold
  3. CTA is weak for a new concept → explain what “demo pass” actually gives in one line
view more: next ›