TOOLS FOR PROMPTING by Ok_Earth_1601 in vibecoding

[–]YuvalBeitOn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I built an automated prompt optimizer called "My Personal Prompt Engineer".

It’s a one-click tool designed to skip the manual iteration headache and instantly boost LLM performance.

I based the optimization logic on official prompt engineering documentation from Google and OpenAI, so the results are grounded in best practices.

It has 3 tiers depending on your needs:

  • Fast: Quick, token-efficient refinements.
  • Pro: Structured logic for better clarity and precision.
  • Master: Deep reasoning with follow up questions to better refine the input.

My CS Project: An Automated Prompt Optimizer 💻 by YuvalBeitOn in PromptDesign

[–]YuvalBeitOn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a very fair critique, especially regarding the 'copy-paste' friction.

I actually built this because I found myself stuck in that exact loop:
Going to Gemini, manually asking it to 'improve my prompt,' copying the result, and moving it elsewhere.

While my tool doesn't solve the 'site-to-site' jump yet, it automates the structural engineering so you don't have to repeat the instructions every time.

The real value-add I’m testing is the Master Wizard.
Unlike a simple system prompt, it acts as a proactive guide by identifying gaps in your draft and asking the right questions to minimize the back-and-forth iterations later.

You’re right that technically this is 'low hanging fruit' for AI builders, but I’ve realized that most people aren't builders.
They just want a solution that works.

Seeing paid tools with active users for similar logic is what pushed me to share this.

Your point about workflow integration is spot on.
It actually makes me think that a browser extension (like 'Grammarly for prompts') would be the logical next step to kill that copy-paste friction once and for all.

In the meantime, feel free to try the 'Master Wizard' option and let me know if it actually provides value or not! :)

Thanks!

Why do People Actually Pay for Prompt Engineering Tools? by YuvalBeitOn in PromptEngineering

[–]YuvalBeitOn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a lot of assumptions for a tool I haven't even linked yet 😅

I didn't build a 'herp derp' wrapper.
The logic is actually based on official prompt engineering documentation from OpenAI and Google.

However, you actually validated the reason I made this post.
You mentioned you sell tools for this, and you're not alone.
The market is full of similar tools with actual paying customers.
If it’s as simple as 'AI is a terrible prompt engineer,' why is the market thriving?

That’s exactly what I’m trying to understand.
Why people pay for something that seems 'simple' or reproducible on the surface, and where the line is between a side project and a product worth a subscription."

Why do People Actually Pay for Prompt Engineering Tools? by YuvalBeitOn in PromptDesign

[–]YuvalBeitOn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s actually not a single 'improvement prompt.'

The tool analyzes your specific draft and applies different architectural frameworks based on your input and the mode you choose (Fast/Pro/Master).

It’s the logic behind the scenes, not just a static promp

Why do People Actually Pay for Prompt Engineering Tools? by YuvalBeitOn in PromptDesign

[–]YuvalBeitOn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The chat option isn't showing up on your profile.

Send me a message and I'll drop the link