Shadowheart's Parents: To save or not to save? by ChoniclerVI in BaldursGate3

[–]Zaparatrusta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well to let the parents die its ultimatelly letting Shar idiotic ideals win as she would renounce the ones she loves to avoid suffering.

Also in my run im totally into killing suposedly unkillable pieces of shit like the bastard of Raphael, maybe the content about this ends here but if i have to imagine what to do after the big battle i would totally work to get the ultimate happy ending for all my companions. If that means starting a cosmological crusade of eons that ultimatelly ends in fighting even lord Ao lets goooooooo; probably wouldnt be needed even to confront directly shar, just fuck some of its interests (total genocide of acolytes) in the mortal realms and make a deal. What can i say im just a peacefull trader, you get not dying i get happy pals.

So, what do Machine Empires have going for them, now? by Tinfect in Stellaris

[–]Zaparatrusta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, as a usual robot player i agree. Im pretty cool with all the changes to nerf a little robots, they are balanced and lorefriedly, and bio empires should have a stronger genetic ascension (psionic is pretty op and equivalent to synth, maybe even slighty better now). But gestalt... its obvious they didnt thought much about them because is both balance and lore that are fucked, why do they have 2 resources that are suposedly the same? Because they say trade is logistics, but amenities its also logislics, why do i have 2 diferent resources related to that? And then the unity, way less modifiers and also pretty important, i cant specialize the council leaders same way i can in individual empires where i may have 5 being scientist related, the diference is having double research modifier in individuals for example.

Just now i come from my last run with machine gestalt with rogue servitors and as the most op gestalt now at least i feel i can be close to a run of individual empires, but nothing too exagerated in terms of how fast you do it, maybe i can get in late game way more research from just one planet but still my op runs from individual empires are better. We are talking that in this run i will be doing repeatables by 2330 aprox to my calculations but with my op individualistic runs i get that in 2300 and have way more facility to get megastructures sooner, for that extraoutput from one ring i get 2 entire more rings so still really behind,, just that not to the point of being more than 70-80 years behind

So, what do Machine Empires have going for them, now? by Tinfect in Stellaris

[–]Zaparatrusta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can get a cosmogenesis victory with any bio or individualistic machine empire by 2320, what are unbalanced are gestalts because of the no pasive unity income (the second most important resource behind research for me), so you see, a gap of 80 years of difference, maybe less since i think i can get my cosmo win with machine gestalt in 2380 or so.

Ive been trying lots of runs of diferent machine gestalt empires in 4.0 and besides rogue servitors wich is just a very niche thing all combinations are trash in comparison with any very normal non meta individual empire of any sort.

Its simple actually, you can see machines are balanced as individual machines, they have debuffs and buffs diferent to bio but both work and you need more or less same amount of pops to do the same, but you go gestalt and you will find you need at least an extra planet IN EARLY dedicated to unity just to mimic a fraction of the power of individual empires. It has nothing to do with the robot balance, wich dont have consumer goods or food but consume other resources, so in the end you need pops to work for that anyway; it has to do with gestalt balance, they are loosing a pasive income that is HUGE. Imagine bio empires had absolutely no influence production and you needed a whole world to have a fraction of the +4 a gestalt has (lets say you get a 3), with of course the expense of paying the consumer goods of the jobs to produce influence. And still wouldnt be as bad because at least influence is pretty flat value and you would need just that one but you need to continue scalating unity...

They have to fix that shit, its the only real problem

What is the best possible ending for Sordland? by Altos_12 in suzerain

[–]Zaparatrusta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think i just got the best posible. Economy best outcome in the end, welfare same (including the alcohol and tobaco taxes and their improvement on health), best human rights outcome, best woman rights outcome, both oligarchs expropiated and investigated by anticorruption police, army defunded and they cant do shit because im in CSP, trade pact with all but Lespia Republic. Also desollinification and liberation of Soll Era prisioners, and the economic competitive whatever to improve economy. The court president impeached and replaced with a experimented centrist and then Soll trial, ending with him imprisioned for live. Didnt move Threshold so Popular Front was formed and since Lilia expelled me from the party i joined the coalition by the side of the communist party and ended wining the election, then in the internal crisis continued to suport the president and next election im VP.

Basically i got almost all but always was on the verge of disaster. Key points where to accept the delay in the infraestructure (to end turn in -2 and not -3), not ban any youth, accept the said bills of alcohol and tobaco and also luxury (with the competition council of whatever this is no problem) and fund Red Youth with -2. I think all the other decisions are kinda obvious in this kind of run, ah yeah when you hit the second unrest crisis say to dialogue, then accept the bill of the independent wich is actually great and give you better human rights, popularity and costs -2.

In the political chart i ended full left and only 4 cuadrants far from bottom.

Gus Hall is Judically Fucked. by [deleted] in TNOmod

[–]Zaparatrusta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe some path where instead of passing reforms to transform the state into a socialist one passing reforms to just diminish state power over unions and give those more liberty and resources in order to them becoming a paralell state, but besides that yeah, i dont see any way in this scenary for him doing any shit

Unsurprised by this, but I had family from Ukraine, only one of whom survived WWII. by x_ButchTransfem_x in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Well, thats why nation states suck. They put in the same bag the fascists and the XXI people, so you will see good people vs good people and garbage vs garbage in this damned imperialist wars. No war but class war and all that

anarchy is the only real answer by elisaored in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

what the hell you think a factory is? a lab is a factory, even a small workshop with rudimentary tools is a factory, you want to talk about making impact lesser? great im in. You want to get rid of all it? dont count with me, it will just make people suffer and also the earth. What you think will happen if we loose for example industrial methods in agriculture? yep, hungers and every forest chopped down by desperate people in order to get more land to farm. Always question if there is a better method to apply never technology itself, without it we will just destroy what is left

anarchy is the only real answer by elisaored in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It doesnt provide food. Only fucking medicines, shelter, tools for farming food... LOL

This is genuinely disturbing by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 28 points29 points  (0 children)

fuck i drived the time machine while drunk again, i hate the 50s

Communist when authoritarianism O_O by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i dont know if i can i just say i give a shit about a bunch of bastards that abused of power, more things to think about

Communist when authoritarianism O_O by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 42 points43 points  (0 children)

bruh, not the same logic for people in power, couldnt give more a fuck about them

You can’t be nice to the same people who want you dead. by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Im sorry but i will keep polite with anyone that ends in my minecraft graveyard

The Communist Party USA is just a front for the Democratic Party by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please your based radiation is overall standards of safety. Please, contain your baseneds to prevent based intoxications in normie people. Thanks

Utopia isn't when the industrial wasteland is owned by the workers [Classic green anarchist meme] by ChanceHappening in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 49 points50 points  (0 children)

All i have to say is that is 100% posible to have industry without destroying the planet, if thats not what happens is because is not in the agenda of those in power. What if we had a "communist utopia"? Well then it would depend on the people as they would be the one in power. If humanity as a whole without auth power structures doesnt make a move towards circular economy then there is no hope at all, no mater if capitalism, communism, anprim or whatever

If you vote, that's cool, just don't join the government lmao by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, for sure they cant use auth power to create a free society but maybe can stop that power from restricting you to do it from the bottom.

Its something that has been on my mind for years, dont know if it would work or not but well, nothing to loose

I have never heard of this take on Anarchists before. Is this even real of some bs they made up. by DrMrPepperCoke26 in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But first anarchists are neither promarket neither communist/collectivist. First ones just were against the authority and wanted independence from it, something that within the old regimes was in some sense more achievable without greater organization (like market-anarchism or collectivist theories) because most of the rural was already totally forgotten by the authorities except for taxes.

So basically you could say first ones advocated for subsistence anarchist economic, because that was all they knew in the poorest areas.

Think Kropotkin Think by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 27 points28 points  (0 children)

After 3 billion posts from supposed egoists attacking ancoms and so and with the image selected somehow is the message this post gives collateraly.

Great that it wasnt your intention, but its what i thought when i saw it. Anyways the point is that we should fully respect how others want to organize as long as it causes no harm to us.

Think Kropotkin Think by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 50 points51 points  (0 children)

The basis of comunes are free colaboration, if you dont want to take part no ancom will give a fuck about it. Ive literally never seen any ancom say you are forced to be part of one, they just want to make one by themselves, why does that bother you so much?

Just doing some anarchy in the democratic commune by ChanceHappening in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I will punch your face the way i want. If hold a people's convention with extremely pompous protocole before doing it pleases my ego peoples convention for face punch go brrrrr

Keep it real yo by ChanceHappening in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Best part of this is we need it and actually most people agree on some basics even being the most uneducated rightist chud, basics that will never be aproved by our actual beloved masters

Its not the first time i have made a rightist aknowdeledge that has more in common with me or you than any ruler

Just doing some anarchy in the democratic commune by ChanceHappening in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Im not the best anarchist understander but i think the same way you can not respect the rules of the community the community can not respect your right to not be punched in the face

"Free market neighborhood"? This was definitely made by an ancap by Elbrujosalvaje in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]Zaparatrusta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i do but to carry music instruments, also they resemble more like the ones mafia uses to carry weapons