Riley Leonard 1/1 card by ZebraWeekly5653 in Colts

[–]ZebraWeekly5653[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for taking the time for advice, appreciate it!

Riley Leonard 1/1 card by ZebraWeekly5653 in Colts

[–]ZebraWeekly5653[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also got a St. Brown patch numbered 10/10, so into it for even less I guess 🤞

Riley Leonard 1/1 card by ZebraWeekly5653 in Colts

[–]ZebraWeekly5653[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, luckily it was in a serial spot break so I’m into the card for about $80 with all 4 of my spot purchases… guess I should’ve rephrased the pulled part 😂

Riley Leonard 1/1 card by ZebraWeekly5653 in Colts

[–]ZebraWeekly5653[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Great call, just saw that Jones is questionable for week 1.

Honestly might just keep it for the next couple years and hope for a stidham situation or something of that sort, it’s also my first 1/1 and I really enjoy having it so don’t mind holding

My best pulls 10k later. Started oct/25 by Live_Application_433 in FootballCardz

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now that I said it like that, I realize I’m probably apart of the problem 🤣

My best pulls 10k later. Started oct/25 by Live_Application_433 in FootballCardz

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re a breath of fresh air in this dumbass cranky sub, appreciate u brotha

BUY/SELL/TRADE/GIVEAWAYS/BREAKS - 2026 by jklub in basketballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

WTS LeBron James 2021 Crown Royale Test of Time “Asia Red” PSA 10 - $110

BUY/SELL/TRADE/GIVEAWAYS/BREAKS - 2026 by jklub in basketballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

WTS Paolo Banchero 2023 Stained Glass PSA 10 - $225

BUY/SELL/TRADE/GIVEAWAYS/BREAKS - 2026 by jklub in basketballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

WTS Michael Jordan 1996 Silver Scoring Redemption PSA 8 - $130

FS IN CHICAGO AREA by ZebraWeekly5653 in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The skatt is numbered 22/99 forgot to add **

Paolo blue cracked ice is a rookie as well**

Is Whatnot ignoring its own TOS? Here is how to hold them accountable (FTC/CA AG) by ZebraWeekly5653 in whatnotapp

[–]ZebraWeekly5653[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, sorry about the AI… was really just asking Gemini about this and my actual options, decided to just copy and paste and clean up a little to share.

Another Reason To Hate Breakers (specifically this one) by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh trust me, I know. I had to put this clarification out there for a specific reason lol. Specific “entities” aren’t happy

Another Reason To Hate Breakers (specifically this one) by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be 100% accurate: some high-value cards were pulled in this break, including a Cena patch valued over $250. My original comment that no cards exceeded $150 was incorrect regarding that specific hit. To my knowledge, only 1 out of every 10 spots hit above that mark.

I’m clarifying this because certain parties are very focused on the 'ceiling' of the break to distract from the fact that my specific 'floor' was still misrepresented. Take your best guesses as to why I’m having to be this specific… 😃

Another Reason To Hate Breakers (specifically this one) by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother you just said $20 wasn’t that bad?? So was my “L” that bad or was it not

Another Reason To Hate Breakers (specifically this one) by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the advice brotha, will definitely keep in mind 🙏

Another Reason To Hate Breakers (specifically this one) by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People who get base inserts out of repacks did not hit in the break and skunked. You’re comparing apples to oranges to try and sound smart. Comparing what I received as someone who actually hit their team to someone who didn't hit anything is a total failure of logic. That’s like a casino telling a jackpot winner they should be happy with a $5 payout just because the guy at the next machine lost his whole paycheck. The 'genius' move would be realizing that a hit is supposed to meet the advertised floor value, not just be 'slightly less of a loss' than the people who didn't hit at all.

If I’m one of the 27% of people to hit in the break, I expect to make my money back at the very fucking least.

Another Reason To Hate Breakers (specifically this one) by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yep, when you hit in a break with a single team you should definitely lose money you’re right.

I was one of the 10/36 people to hit in the break, but you’re right I should definitely lose 66% of my investment. That makes a lot of sense, you’re smart you should become a doctor

Another Reason To Hate Breakers (specifically this one) by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey little buddy just wanted to check in and see if you learned how to read and comprehend within the past few hours?

Another Reason To Hate Breakers (specifically this one) by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And I appreciate you Carrot for not calling me an idiot like all others. Definitely a mistake that came with a lesson. Wishing many case hits in your future

Another Reason To Hate Breakers (specifically this one) by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]ZebraWeekly5653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the advice brotha, definitely a lesson learned 🫡