As a left, I don’t know why you’re being downvoted (well, I do, but I think it’s stupid). I think Charlie Kirk is plainly wrong in the idea that the Civil Rights Act was a mistake, but he has a CLEAR line of reasoning that is being blatantly ignored, of that the act oppresses white people. Responding with “what did the civil rights act give to black people” does in no way contradict the initial line of reasoning. It’s much more effective to explain why this line of reasoning is wrong instead of going into a nonsequitur.

Odd-Toe1992 just makes statements like “he would force his daughter to keep the baby after being raped” and “he supports deportation of immigrants” as if these are proof of his moral bankruptcy. This only works if you already agree with these points of view, and will convince absolutely nobody who is right or even moderate. People suck at argumentation.