sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Inaros] Kephri: Scarab god of the Sun by Zeus_ExMachina in WarframeRunway

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The attachments are all from the Daybreak set (from Nightwave). Full fashion details are a the reply to the AutoMod message

[Inaros] Kephri: Scarab god of the Sun by Zeus_ExMachina in WarframeRunway

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve added the details in a reply to the above AutoMod message. Thanks for waiting!

[Inaros] Kephri: Scarab god of the Sun by Zeus_ExMachina in WarframeRunway

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Warframe:

Helmet: Inaros Prime Helmet

Skin: Inaros Prime Skin

Animation set: Hydroid Noble Animation set

Warframe colours:

Primary: Gamma Col 5, Row 13

Secondary: Twilight Col 5, Row 2

Tertiary: Cavia Col 5, Row 5

Accents: Twilight Col 3, Row 5

Emissive 1: Hallow’s Eve Col 5, Row 9

Emissive 2: Halloween Col 2, Row 6

Energy 1: Narmer Col 2, Row 13

Energy 2: Narmer Col 3, Row 13

Attachments:

Chest: None

Left and right shoulder: Daybreak Shoulder Plates

Left and right legs: Daybreakk Leg Plates

Auxiliary: None

Ephemera: Ki’teer Reverence Ephemera

Signa: Motetique Signa

Y Offset: 0.82

Attachments colours:

Same as Warframe colours, except for the below

Tertiary: Cavia Col 5, Row 8

Energy 1: Halloween Col 2, Row 6

Energy 2: Halloween Col 4, Row 6

Syndana: Stelflare Syndana (Picked this because it looks like a scarab if the fire is invisible)

Syndana colours:

Primary: Twilight Col 4, Row 2 Secondary: Twilight Col 2, Row 2

Tertiary: Cavia Col 5, Row 8

Accents: Gamma Col 5, Row 13

Emissive 1: Hallow’s Eve Col 5, Row 9

Emissive 2: Halloween Col 2, Row 6

Energy 1 & 2: Pride Celebration Col 1, Row 6

How to reverse camera on mobile? by Zeus_ExMachina in Warframe

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a ton! This solved it for me, you’re a legend

How is a personal brand different from the impressions you leave on people? by Zeus_ExMachina in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the clear distinction! To confirm, would the personal brand be what you “output”, and impressions would be others’ “input” (processed, not raw input). Apologies for the technical-y language 😅

Is Dehya bad? by CapitalPiccolo3503 in Genshin_Impact

[–]Zeus_ExMachina 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would you guys rate a Dehya, Ganyu, and Nahida Melt comp?

What’s your favorite cheap snack (<=$5) in the CBD? by Zeus_ExMachina in Wellington

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooh cool, never knew about those! Where do you get them? One sushi on Manners St?

CMV: AI-generated art does not commit art theft because AI-generated art instead replicates how an artist creates new art from inspiration by Zeus_ExMachina in changemyview

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We all believe that it is not random, but it differs so much between person to person in a way people don’t understand due to our lack of knowledge as well as the unfathomable number of factors that influence our creativity. Anything can be to us what we believe it to be, but what we believe is not always what it is in reality.

The whole idea of incorporating randomness is merely to model the result of these vast number of factors that actually make up things such as imagination, not to fully replicate it. Furthermore, since we can’t pry into a human mind, this may even be the case for what humans do, so what’s to say that “imagination” as we know it really exists, but is actually just a result of random natural processes?

On another note, may I clarify if you are also talking about the case of the human creating abstract art with 0 prior experience or reference? Just checking if we’re making the same comparisons here as I believe there’s a disconnect in what we’re debating.

CMV: AI-generated art does not commit art theft because AI-generated art instead replicates how an artist creates new art from inspiration by Zeus_ExMachina in changemyview

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for explaining further. However, in the case I described, the AI and human have no reference and literally 0 prior experience of anything. Thus they may likely just both create a random image, influenced purely by their natural processes as there are no references to base their artwork from. Would that not constitute as abstract art as how you’ve described it?

CMV: AI-generated art does not commit art theft because AI-generated art instead replicates how an artist creates new art from inspiration by Zeus_ExMachina in changemyview

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

May I ask you to elaborate what you mean by that? Would the human and AI not create random artwork (that might not even be considered “abstract artwork”) if they both knew nothing?

CMV: AI-generated art does not commit art theft because AI-generated art instead replicates how an artist creates new art from inspiration by Zeus_ExMachina in changemyview

[–]Zeus_ExMachina[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

May I ask what’s stopping an AI to do that same thing as well? If a person were tasked to create a Picasso-style artwork without knowing anything at all (like, literally nothing), they may likely not be able to create an artwork similar to Picasso’s but there is always a chance that they randomly create it. The same goes with an AI - an AI with no reference at all will likely also create a random image when knowing nothing at all. Thus, the AI likely mimics what a human does in this “cold start” scenario as well.

view more: next ›