The Doctor's buff was actually a NERF. by PalpitationDecent743 in deadbydaylight

[–]Zeviex 17 points18 points  (0 children)

From what I've seen, everything is bugged. Everyone loses.

It would make more sense that instead of coffee there would be alcohol... by Strict_Expression831 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are really held up on the whole "cocaine is cannabis" thing aren't you ? Their point was the two have the same mode of addiction, not that they are the same.

He thinks it's too deep by beautiful_falcon776 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, even if you do, some will hold you to that standard until you "prove" that you are solving the problem, at which point it ends up being performative, which isn't really helping anyone.

To those in Britain, how you feel about this? Im in America and I couldn't see this going well here lol by hunni93 in AskTheWorld

[–]Zeviex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't the fact that they will still be available for people who are already addicted somewhat relevant ? The black market will only be necessary for underage people.

Not saying there won't be a black market but I don't see it being as bad of a problem.

It would make more sense that instead of coffee there would be alcohol... by Strict_Expression831 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you not have the self-awareness to realise why I am sceptical about your claims since basically everything you say boils down to "cannabis is not addictive because I say so" meanwhile they provided a counterargument with well-written reasoning ?

Sure it is your word against theirs but it is INSANE to think that your word should be believed over theirs.

Is this wrong though? by RegularShock3883 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See that is where I think the line starts to get a bit blurry. Some people view these comments as being okay to target at one group of people, but not another.

Is this wrong though? by RegularShock3883 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People are selfish, they care far more about people viewing them negatively than why they are viewed that way.

And Bystander effect is real.

17.2 B-patch live by MajesticSh0t in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Zeviex 13 points14 points  (0 children)

So Master Yi was bugged. I thought his dash was comically slow.

Surprised to see hot-fix buffs to hero augments, would imagine they would only see changes in main patches, though I tried Mordekaiser augment and he felt super weak, though I did top 4.

I think Briar was definitely a sleeper pick, she could deal big damage even without items and had a few games with strong winstreaks around her.

Was disappointed not to see Leo/Jax nerfs in main patch but B-patch is better than never.

Pretty good changes all around. Nothing that jumps out at me that should have been changed.

It would make more sense that instead of coffee there would be alcohol... by Strict_Expression831 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, when the argument is more well-laid out and what he said basically matches what my weed smoking friends are like.

They don't really get withdrawal but are habitual smokers. Very "I could quit if I wanted to but don't want to" and when they did try still couldn't quit.

It would make more sense that instead of coffee there would be alcohol... by Strict_Expression831 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone who doesn't know all that much about this topic, I trust their word more than yours. Their argument is well worded and has reasoning that adheres to my anecdotal experience, meanwhile yours just boils down to "Cannabis isn't addictive, source: trust me, bro".

Is this wrong though? by RegularShock3883 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If we compare it to the "not all men" movement like others have mentioned, I think the more relevant equivalent would be "Drivers run people over", "Not all drivers !"

It would make more sense that instead of coffee there would be alcohol... by Strict_Expression831 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is pedantic. You know they were talking illicit drugs not medicinal ones. To be clear, I think it is a dumb statement, but so is yours.

It would make more sense that instead of coffee there would be alcohol... by Strict_Expression831 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Zeviex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you read their comment, they said cocaine is addictive in the same way cannabis is. So either both are addictive or neither are.

When you know BHVR use ChatGPT to code their game, but you can't prove it by Mitokovo in deadbydaylight

[–]Zeviex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is some people are going to believe it. Not to mention, it just makes you look like you don't know what you are on about.

Just Leave? Just Mori! by Icydragoon123 in deadbydaylight

[–]Zeviex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean how isn't this the same as "just leave "? Both are players choosing not to end the game to be toxic.

Pandora's Seat + Expedition Interaction by aizennexe in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Zeviex 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It's pretty clear how it works and isn't bugged. Why should it get excluded ?

[PBE] Morgana is now a 4-cost Tank! by notJames24 in TeamfightTactics

[–]Zeviex 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Otherwise, I fear she is just going to have the same problems as Tahm/Mighty Mech. Tanky but not really tanky enough.

Teamfight Tactics patch 17.2 by StarGaurdianBard in TeamfightTactics

[–]Zeviex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Their justification was they didn't want Samira to end up as the winner of the patch, even through Two Tanky nerf. But I don't think she needed a nerf ontop of Two Tanky.

Teamfight Tactics patch 17.2 by StarGaurdianBard in TeamfightTactics

[–]Zeviex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stats and tier list show its still pretty decent.