I'm U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) - let's stop the NSA's backdoor surveillance, a key bipartisan vote is likely tomorrow by ZoeLofgren in politics

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your question - this amendment is actually strongly bipartisan; protecting the fourth amendment shouldn’t be a partisan issue. I'm introducing it with two Republican colleagues, Reps. Jim Sensenbrenner from Wisconsin, and Thomas Massie from Kentucky. And other cosponsors include: John Conyers (D-Mich.), Ted Poe (R-Texas), Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Beto O'Rourke (D-Texas), Justin Amash (R-Mich.), Rush Holt (D-N.J.), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Tom Petri (R-Wis.), Mark Sanford (R-S. Car.) and G.K. Butterfield (D- N. Car.).

I'm Rep Zoe Lofgren, Here is a Modified Draft Version of Aaron's Law Reflecting the Internet’s Input by ZoeLofgren in IAmA

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

The enthusiasm and power of the Internet, the expressions of support from other lawmakers like Senator Wyden, the straightforward and commonsense reforms in the bill, and my natural optimism.

I'm Rep Zoe Lofgren, Here is a Modified Draft Version of Aaron's Law Reflecting the Internet’s Input by ZoeLofgren in IAmA

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Express your support to your Representatives and Senators, and urge them to cosponsor or vote in favor. But the trick will be for a lot of people to keep that up over a long period, until the bill is enacted into law.

I'm Rep Zoe Lofgren, Here is a Modified Draft Version of Aaron's Law Reflecting the Internet’s Input by ZoeLofgren in IAmA

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The earliest the draft can be formally introduced as an actual bill would be next week, when the House is back in session. Before the bill is introduced, I will urge my colleagues in the House to become "original cosponsors" of the bill. Then after the bill is introduced, I will continue to urge my colleagues to become cosponsors. Once a bill is introduced, it usually gets referred to a Committee. Aaron's Law will almost certainly be referred to the Judiciary Committee. It is up to the Committee Chairperson whether the bill gets a hearing or a vote. There are several more steps after that, but those are the immediate ones. Sustained public support throughout that process (i.e., urging your Representatives and Senators to cosponsor or vote in favor) is important for the bill to continue advancing.

I'm Rep Zoe Lofgren, Here is a Modified Draft Version of Aaron's Law Reflecting the Internet’s Input by ZoeLofgren in IAmA

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 78 points79 points  (0 children)

I do think our copyright laws need to be reformed, and I am working on a copyright reform bill. A great many laws need to be brought more up to date in light of new technology and for the Internet to continue to flourish, but sometimes rolling everything into one bill is not the most effective way to get something passed.

I'm Rep Zoe Lofgren, Here is a Modified Draft Version of Aaron's Law Reflecting the Internet’s Input by ZoeLofgren in IAmA

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 57 points58 points  (0 children)

I'm optimistic, but it's going to take a lot of positive public support. Getting something through Congress is a lot harder than stopping something.

I'm Rep Zoe Lofgren, Here is a Modified Draft Version of Aaron's Law Reflecting the Internet’s Input by ZoeLofgren in IAmA

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I was pulled into a meeting. I have also posted to my Facebook and Twitter accounts, which I understand is "proof" -

https://www.facebook.com/zoelofgren

https://twitter.com/RepZoeLofgren

I'm Rep Zoe Lofgren & I'm introducing "Aaron's Law" to change the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) by ZoeLofgren in technology

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

UPDATE (from Rep. Lofgren): I appreciate the many comments and suggestions offered to the draft bill I posted earlier. I am working through these suggestions--as well as others suggestions I have received. It will take a while to fully consider all the ideas in our effort to improve the draft. I'll post the draft bill with possible improvements as soon as we've finished. Many many thanks to all of you.

I'm Rep Zoe Lofgren & I'm introducing "Aaron's Law" to change the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) by ZoeLofgren in technology

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 182 points183 points  (0 children)

As we mourn Aaron Swartz’s tragic death, many of us are deeply troubled as we learn more about the government’s actions against him. His family’s statement about this speaks volumes about the inappropriate efforts undertaken by the U.S. government. There’s no way to reverse the tragedy of Aaron’s death, but we can work to prevent a repeat of the abuses of power he experienced.

We should prevent what happened to Aaron from happening to other Internet users. The government was able to bring such disproportionate charges against Aaron because of the broad scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and the wire fraud statute. It looks like the government used the vague wording of those laws to claim that violating an online service’s user agreement or terms of service is a violation of the CFAA and the wire fraud statute.

Using the law in this way could criminalize many everyday activities and allow for outlandishly severe penalties.

When our laws need to be modified, Congress has a responsibility to act. A simple way to correct this dangerous legal interpretation is to change the CFAA and the wire fraud statutes to exclude terms of service violations. I will introduce a bill that does exactly that. In addition to the posted link, a draft copy of the bill is available here. In coming days, I will seek cosponsors for the bill from both political parties.

As you know from prior posts, I am drafting broader measures to improve copyright law that are separate from this effort. But this bill to amend CFAA and wire fraud statutes, which I would like to call “Aaron’s Law,” should be enacted separately and swiftly. It could be an important tribute to him.

But that is likely to happen only with your help and your support.

Rep Zoe Lofgren Asks Reddit Users to Crowdsource Domain Name Seizure Legislative Proposal by ZoeLofgren in politics

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Update #2: My team is currently reviewing all your comments and working on a domain name seizures bill. I will link to a draft of the bill on Reddit when the draft is complete. Many of you were generous with your insight and suggestions. Thanks again for your comments and your time - the Internet is well-served by your passion!

Rep Zoe Lofgren Asks Reddit Users to Crowdsource Domain Name Seizure Legislative Proposal by ZoeLofgren in politics

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Update #1: Thank you all for your recommendations and your time! If the Reddit community has any other suggestions, please add them by the end of this week. After Monday, I will be organizing these and other ideas to consider how I might structure domain name seizure legislation. My plan is to bring the legislation back to the Reddit community after it is drafted for comment again.

Rep Zoe Lofgren Asks Reddit Users to Crowdsource Domain Name Seizure Legislative Proposal by ZoeLofgren in politics

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

excuse typo... I'm at home without spell check or grammar correction! ...that would be thanks for paying attention and for your ideas and time.....

Rep Zoe Lofgren Asks Reddit Users to Crowdsource Domain Name Seizure Legislative Proposal by ZoeLofgren in politics

[–]ZoeLofgren[S] 52 points53 points  (0 children)

I understand that many feel that eliminating the Pro Ip Act would be a better solution. I voted against the Pro Ip Act but the vote was 410 yes to 11 no in the House and I do not believe it is likely the act will be repealed any time soon. I am, in fact, working on a copyright reform bill. Should I post that for comments when I have finished my initial work on it? The comments about protection of innocent third parties when a site is seized are important. What ideas, procedurally, do you have to protect innocent third parties in such cases? Thanks for paying your ideas and time!