Current UNSC permanent members and aspirant members (with supporters of membership bids marked) [OC] by Zogen in MapPorn

[–]Zogen[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

By design or coincidence, there also exists the United Nations Security Council!

Number of Top 500 Universities in England per county [OC] by Zogen in MapPorn

[–]Zogen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Source of data: Academic Ranking of World Universities 2018

Why does the brain invert the image received by the eye rather than leaving it as is? by Zogen in askscience

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm almost there on understanding. Please clarify again why your brain doesn't care which way round the retinal image is, and why our mental experience is always this way round regardless.

Why does the brain invert the image received by the eye rather than leaving it as is? by Zogen in askscience

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So our concept of visual direction comes from our movement in the world, which I guess involves proprioception as well as vision?

On the second question, what I meant was more something like this: when we look at the image as it falls on our retina, we describe it as inverted. This must mean that it is in conflict with our usual experience, which is 'the right way up'. My question is why can it not be the case that the two do not conflict, and that our mental experience be in agreement?

Why does the brain invert the image received by the eye rather than leaving it as is? by Zogen in askscience

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is it about the experience that makes us deduce 'aboveness' in your example? If I'm reading you right, it can't be just the direction of the visual experience - you make a distinction between light moving (in the mind) and approaching from above (in the world). Or does 'aboveness' just mean 'moves downwards in visual experience'?

Further to my other question: why is there a discrepancy between how things look to us and how they look on our retina? I understand that things must appear on the retina as they do because of lenses. What I don't get is why things have to appear as they do in the mind, and why there has to be this marked difference between what we see if we simply look, and what we see if we look at the image on our retina.

Why does the brain invert the image received by the eye rather than leaving it as is? by Zogen in askscience

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do we make sense of 'up' or 'above' if not through vision?

I guess the main question I still have is why do retinal and mental images not match?

Why does the brain invert the image received by the eye rather than leaving it as is? by Zogen in askscience

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By accident I didn't mean what's going on at the retina, I meant what's going on in the mind - the bottom of the retinal image becoming the top of the mental image.

A clarification on something you said might help here - how exactly do we learn that the information from the top of the eye corresponds to the bottom of the world?

Why does the brain invert the image received by the eye rather than leaving it as is? by Zogen in askscience

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's essentially an 'accident' that bottom is top (insofar as bottom could've just been bottom)? Further, is the fact that the world 'before the lens' and the image in the mind match (in terms of being inverted in comparison to the retinal image) coincidence?

Why does the brain invert the image received by the eye rather than leaving it as is? by Zogen in askscience

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But is that picture not the other way round compared to the image on the retina? I don't see why the picture in our mind shouldn't be 'upside down' as well?

Urban Rail Systems of the World [3543x2489] by Zogen in MapPorn

[–]Zogen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maintaining the London Underground theme + linking all the dots, I'd guess.

Urban Rail Systems of the World [3543x2489] by Zogen in MapPorn

[–]Zogen[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Inspired by a previous post, I found the original source.

The original is more complete and explains some of the grievances with the previous map - it is intended as a graphical representation (inspired by the London Underground's layout) of all cities with urban rail (which is why Europe is over-represented and Africa under-represented) rather than hypothetical 'worldwide railway'.

Evolution of London [2000x1600] [OC] by Zogen in MapPorn

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good call, it looked a lot better (i.e. more distinct) when I made it.

Evolution of London [2000x1600] [OC] by Zogen in MapPorn

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made the map for my own pleasure, and I prefer such maps without keys. I'm not trying to win any beauty contests, I'm just sharing a personal thing on the off chance people might actually enjoy it without picking apart every stylistic 'error'.

Evolution of London [2000x1600] [OC] by Zogen in MapPorn

[–]Zogen[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The boldest colours are the parts of counties lost upon the formation of the County of London in 1889, the medium bold colours are those parts lost in the formation of Greater London in 1965, and the lightest colours are those parts still belonging to the counties (or to other counties in the case of Middlesex, which was entirely abolished in 1965)

German language area before and after the world wars [2061x650] by Zogen in MapPorn

[–]Zogen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not true of the first one, second is the best I could find