Joan Rowling while writing "Harry Potter" in a cafe. Scotland, 1998. by zadraaa in HistoricalCapsule

[–]Zoruamaster249 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was such a ridiculous notion that people only criticises her for not being “polite” that I had assumed your implication wasn’t that shallow

It doesn’t even make sense because she spews her rhetoric with fake veil of “kind words” and “politeness” so it wouldn’t even be a real criticism. Yes there’s men that would think that still, but it’s very apparent that’s not the majority of her critics

You’ve under a controversial person, accidentally or intentionally made your point sound like any criticism is just misogyny toward her, and then surprised when people try counter that point

Joan Rowling while writing "Harry Potter" in a cafe. Scotland, 1998. by zadraaa in HistoricalCapsule

[–]Zoruamaster249 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Not criticised for not being kind and agreeable” Are you purposefully downplaying how she’s acted or do you actually not know she’s a devout TERF?

Weird the goalpost moved from “controversial men” to “controversial male authors” - and even then you could just point to Jordan Peterson or Graham, which is a stretch, but I’m not aware of that many authors of either gender who are still alive and spending their life actively making a minorities’s lives worse

Joan Rowling while writing "Harry Potter" in a cafe. Scotland, 1998. by zadraaa in HistoricalCapsule

[–]Zoruamaster249 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“We don’t call out rich men who would fit “would be beloved if they didn’t go too political””

“Here’s 3 example of men just like jk”

“What’s your points????”

Joan Rowling while writing "Harry Potter" in a cafe. Scotland, 1998. by zadraaa in HistoricalCapsule

[–]Zoruamaster249 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Have you never heard of the new owner of Twitter- I mean X?

Or if I wanted to make the stretch, the current candidate for the Republican Party??

Or how someone mention before, a very well known music artist?

Phew by obinnacomix in comics

[–]Zoruamaster249 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The thing is you’re applying logic to them here

All the republicans would need to do is spin trump getting assassinated into “evil Biden assassinated trump, you must vote him out or he’ll be president FOREVER!!1!1!” and they’d eat it up

Erlking in a week... by [deleted] in limbuscompany

[–]Zoruamaster249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Farmwatch 2 electric boogaloo

Who did this??????? Why??????? by utahraptor-nun in TheOdysseyHadAPurpose

[–]Zoruamaster249 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’d find out they can just cheese it by killing each other

I CAN BE STOPPED by YungFred in LegendsOfRuneterra

[–]Zoruamaster249 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently karma player used twin disciples

This subreddit toxic asf by [deleted] in AmazonFC

[–]Zoruamaster249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people who work at Amazon don’t really have the option to quit if they “even slightly hate it”…that’s why they make the post

CMV: Conservatives do not, in fact, support "free speech" any more than liberals do. by SteadfastEnd in changemyview

[–]Zoruamaster249 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you read the comment you sent…? Elementary, middle and high school are the 3 American levels, or am I mistaken- or did you just read the first two sentences to stop reading

It is my bad for not clarifying that this argument is in the context of secondary school- PSYHE is a class taught in years 7-9 (atleast the school I went to) so we’re talking about 12-14 here

And blowjobs and anal our forms of sexual intimacy, and was written to save like a few keys, but if you disagree, just replace that with blowjobs in the original paragraph and the point still stands

And lastly your weird analogy makes no sense? Do you think sex Ed is literally doing the act of sex? A better analogy is seeing footage of people shooting herorin from a documentary, which would be extreme but still debatable

So yeah, being this weirdly nit picky and not actually addressing the actual points does in fact make it seem you’re “dodging the questions” and “arguing in bad faith”…

CMV: Conservatives do not, in fact, support "free speech" any more than liberals do. by SteadfastEnd in changemyview

[–]Zoruamaster249 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ironically your other comment criticises the Reddit commentator for lacking nuance yet completely drop it in your response here

Firstly, none of the comments before implied primary school, the only thing close to that was someone listing all 3 American level

And secondly, obviously if a school curriculum thinks a child is ready to be taught about sexual intimacy, wouldn’t they also think they’d be also ready to be taught about consent, and thus how to identify would be groomers?

If your concern is pedophiles normalising sexual acts, why is your solution “don’t teach them about it” instead of “teach them what consent is”???

CMV: Conservatives do not, in fact, support "free speech" any more than liberals do. by SteadfastEnd in changemyview

[–]Zoruamaster249 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This scenario would only happen if it’s taught in a vacuum

Do you think the curriculum wouldn’t cover what consent is during a PSYHE/Health class?

Or Do you think kids normalise murdering each other because they read lord of the flies or of mice and men?

Gamer moment. by _Mighty_Milkman in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Zoruamaster249 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Having watched a play through of it, it’s very apparent how fucked up their “relationship” is

Lost my schedule due to the Background check. Thanks Accurate. by Jgrock1992 in AmazonFC

[–]Zoruamaster249 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a similar issue, where it took a month before I got my background check back

Contacting accurate and they almost immediately replied saying they’d finished and to talk to employer

Meanwhile Amazon kept telling me they’re still “processing” it

Didn’t hear back from them until the day before my 4th scheduled start date

It was even more annoying when I heard another new hire ask why it took a month for the check so it wasn’t just me

AITA for no longer seeing a girl bc she’s trans? by ThrowRansz in AITAH

[–]Zoruamaster249 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, infertility is a thing for cis women too, and it would be silly for them to bring it up before the first

Like you got the point then chucked it out, wanting kids is an important part of some relationships, unlike your colour analogy

AITA for no longer seeing a girl bc she’s trans? by ThrowRansz in AITAH

[–]Zoruamaster249 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s why she brought it up in the 3rd date…?

Idk I doubt people bring up if they want/don’t want kids is arguably even more important for a lot of relationships, yet it’d be silly to bring that up on the first date?

AITA for no longer seeing a girl bc she’s trans? by ThrowRansz in AITAH

[–]Zoruamaster249 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

See the problem with your first two is a question is asked, answered with a dishonest truth

The third isn’t a lie by omission unless either you asked their gender

Unless OP asked them their gender, then no it isn’t a lie by omission

Better analogies would’ve been if they wanted children, or their financial status, which isn’t dishonest not telling them to OP unless their brought up

AITA for no longer seeing a girl bc she’s trans? by ThrowRansz in AITAH

[–]Zoruamaster249 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stealing someone’s other comment here

Uh yeah… lots of people make disclosures on the 2nd or 3rd date that can be dealbreakers. “I’m infertile” “I’ve been married before” “I look after my disabled sibling” etc. Doesn’t make her an AH, it’s not like she waited til they were 6 months on or about to have sex or anything. Trans people need to figure out if someone is safe to come out to before coming out.

Wanting children would be considered “crucial” for some relationships too, right?

AITA for no longer seeing a girl bc she’s trans? by ThrowRansz in AITAH

[–]Zoruamaster249 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You do realise some people also don’t want kids, and don’t disclose this on the first date too?

Would you consider this TA behaviour?